Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Is Artificial Intelligence Better Than Human Clinicians in Predicting Patient Outcomes?

Lee, Joon

Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2020

doi:10.2196/19918 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In contrast with medical imaging diagnostics powered by artificial intelligence (AI), in which deep learning has led to breakthroughs in recent years, patient outcome prediction poses an inherently challenging problem because it focuses on events that have not yet occurred. Interestingly, the performance of machine learning–based patient outcome prediction models has rarely been compared with that of human clinicians in the literature. Human intuition and insight may be sources of underused predictive information that AI will not be able to identify in electronic data. Both human and AI predictions should be investigated together with the aim of achieving a human-AI symbiosis that synergistically and complementarily combines AI with the predictive abilities of clinicians.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References45

  1. 13.
  2. 22.
  3. 24.
  4. 37.
  5. 38.

35 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 45 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.