No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.
Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set
Emily Chen, Kristina Lerman, Emilio Ferrara
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2020
Abstract
Background. At the time of this writing, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak has already put tremendous strain on many countries' citizens, resources, and economies around the world. Social distancing measures, travel bans, self-quarantines, and business closures are changing the very fabric of societies worldwide. With people forced out of public spaces, much of the conversation about these phenomena now occurs online on social media platforms like Twitter.
Objective. In this paper, we describe a multilingual COVID-19 Twitter data set that we are making available to the research community via our COVID-19-TweetIDs GitHub repository.
Methods. We started this ongoing data collection on January 28, 2020, leveraging Twitter’s streaming application programming interface (API) and Tweepy to follow certain keywords and accounts that were trending at the time data collection began. We used Twitter’s search API to query for past tweets, resulting in the earliest tweets in our collection dating back to January 21, 2020.
Results. Since the inception of our collection, we have actively maintained and updated our GitHub repository on a weekly basis. We have published over 123 million tweets, with over 60% of the tweets in English. This paper also presents basic statistics that show that Twitter activity responds and reacts to COVID-19-related events.
Conclusions. It is our hope that our contribution will enable the study of online conversation dynamics in the context of a planetary-scale epidemic outbreak of unprecedented proportions and implications. This data set could also help track COVID-19-related misinformation and unverified rumors or enable the understanding of fear and panic—and undoubtedly more.
Full text
Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:
Read at PubMed CentralReferences 37
- 1.
Taylor D. NY Times. 2020.
Not in our library
- 2.
World Health Organization. 2020.
Not in our library
- 3.
Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533-534.
Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1
- 4.
Wu J, Smith S, Khurana M, Siemaszko C, DeJesus-Banos B. NBC News. 2020.
Not in our library
- 5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020.
Not in our library
- 6.
Hadden J, Casado L. Business Insider.
Not in our library
- 7.
Chavez N, Moshtaghian A. CNN. 2020.
Not in our library
- 8.
Hadden J, Casado L, Sonnemaker T. Business Insider. 2020.
Not in our library
- 9.
Abbas A, Eliyana A, Ekowati D, Saud M, Raza A, Wardani R. Data set on coping strategies in the digital age: The role of psychological well-being and social capital among university students in Java Timor, Surabaya, Indonesia. Data Brief. 2020;30:105583.
Not in our library10.1016/j.dib.2020.105583
- 10.
Fischer S. AXIOS. 2020.
Not in our library
- 11.
Lerman K, Ghosh R. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. 2010.
Not in our library
- 12.
Romero D, Meeder B, Kleinberg J. Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, Complex Contagion on Twitter. 2011;695.
Not in our library10.1145/1963405.1963503
- 13.
Castillo C, Mendoza M, Poblete B. Information Credibility on Twitter. 2011;675-684.
Not in our library10.1145/1963405.1963500
- 14.
Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A. The rise of social bots. Commun ACM. 2016;59(7):96-104.
Not in our library10.1145/2818717
- 15.
Liang H, Fung IC, Tse ZTH, Yin J, Chan C, Pechta LE, Smith BJ, Marquez-Lameda RD, Meltzer MI, Lubell KM, Fu K. How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):438.
Not in our library10.1186/s12889-019-6747-8
- 16.
- 17.
Ferrara E. #COVID-19 on Twitter: Bots, Conspiracies, and Social Media Activism (arXiv.09531). arXiv.org. 2020.
Not in our library
- 18.
Park HW, Park S, Chong M. Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e18897.
Not in our library10.2196/18897
- 19.
- 20.
Twitter.
Not in our library
- 21.
Tweepy.
Not in our library
- 22.
Twitter.
Not in our library
- 23.
Twitter. 2020.
Not in our library
- 24.
Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E. GitHub. 2020.
Not in our library
- 25.
DocNow. GitHub. 2020.
Not in our library
- 26.
DocNow. GitHub. 2020.
Not in our library
- 27.
Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E. COVID-19 TweetIDs. Harvard Dataverse. 2020.
Not in our library10.7910/dvn/dkovla
- 28.
Twitter. 2020.
Not in our library
- 29.
Secon H, Woodward A, Mosher D. Business Insider. 2020.
Not in our library
- 30.
Muccari R, Chow D. NBC News. 2020.
Not in our library
- 31.
CNN Editorial Research. CNN. 2020.
Not in our library
- 32.
Helsel P, Yamamoto A. NBC News.
Not in our library
- 33.
McCann A, Popovich N, Wu J. NY Times. 2020.
Not in our library
- 34.
Yeung J, George S, Kottasová I. CNN. 2020.
Not in our library
- 35.
Allen N, Heinrich M. Reuters. 2020.
Not in our library
- 36.
Twitter. 2020.
Not in our library
- 37.
Morstatter F, Pfeffer J, Liu H, Carley K. Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose. arXiv.org. 2013.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 4
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy on Social Media: Building a Public Twitter Data Set of Antivaccine Content, Vaccine Misinformation, and Conspiracies · 2021No notice
- COVID-19–Related Internet Search Patterns Among People in the United States: Exploratory Analysis · 2020Not checked
- Public Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study · 2020No notice
- Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach · 2020No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.