Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set

Emily Chen, Kristina Lerman, Emilio Ferrara

JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · 2020

doi:10.2196/19273

Abstract

Background. At the time of this writing, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak has already put tremendous strain on many countries' citizens, resources, and economies around the world. Social distancing measures, travel bans, self-quarantines, and business closures are changing the very fabric of societies worldwide. With people forced out of public spaces, much of the conversation about these phenomena now occurs online on social media platforms like Twitter.

Objective. In this paper, we describe a multilingual COVID-19 Twitter data set that we are making available to the research community via our COVID-19-TweetIDs GitHub repository.

Methods. We started this ongoing data collection on January 28, 2020, leveraging Twitter’s streaming application programming interface (API) and Tweepy to follow certain keywords and accounts that were trending at the time data collection began. We used Twitter’s search API to query for past tweets, resulting in the earliest tweets in our collection dating back to January 21, 2020.

Results. Since the inception of our collection, we have actively maintained and updated our GitHub repository on a weekly basis. We have published over 123 million tweets, with over 60% of the tweets in English. This paper also presents basic statistics that show that Twitter activity responds and reacts to COVID-19-related events.

Conclusions. It is our hope that our contribution will enable the study of online conversation dynamics in the context of a planetary-scale epidemic outbreak of unprecedented proportions and implications. This data set could also help track COVID-19-related misinformation and unverified rumors or enable the understanding of fear and panic—and undoubtedly more.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 37

  1. 1.

    Taylor D. NY Times. 2020.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. 2020.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533-534.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30120-1

  4. 4.

    Wu J, Smith S, Khurana M, Siemaszko C, DeJesus-Banos B. NBC News. 2020.

    Not in our library

  5. 5.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020.

    Not in our library

  6. 6.

    Hadden J, Casado L. Business Insider.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Chavez N, Moshtaghian A. CNN. 2020.

    Not in our library

  8. 8.

    Hadden J, Casado L, Sonnemaker T. Business Insider. 2020.

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Abbas A, Eliyana A, Ekowati D, Saud M, Raza A, Wardani R. Data set on coping strategies in the digital age: The role of psychological well-being and social capital among university students in Java Timor, Surabaya, Indonesia. Data Brief. 2020;30:105583.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.dib.2020.105583

  10. 10.

    Fischer S. AXIOS. 2020.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Lerman K, Ghosh R. Information contagion: An empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks. 2010.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Romero D, Meeder B, Kleinberg J. Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, Complex Contagion on Twitter. 2011;695.

    Not in our library10.1145/1963405.1963503

  13. 13.

    Castillo C, Mendoza M, Poblete B. Information Credibility on Twitter. 2011;675-684.

    Not in our library10.1145/1963405.1963500

  14. 14.

    Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A. The rise of social bots. Commun ACM. 2016;59(7):96-104.

    Not in our library10.1145/2818717

  15. 15.

    Liang H, Fung IC, Tse ZTH, Yin J, Chan C, Pechta LE, Smith BJ, Marquez-Lameda RD, Meltzer MI, Lubell KM, Fu K. How did Ebola information spread on twitter: broadcasting or viral spreading? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):438.

    Not in our library10.1186/s12889-019-6747-8

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Ferrara E. #COVID-19 on Twitter: Bots, Conspiracies, and Social Media Activism (arXiv.09531). arXiv.org. 2020.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Park HW, Park S, Chong M. Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5):e18897.

    Not in our library10.2196/18897

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Twitter.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Tweepy.

    Not in our library

  22. 22.

    Twitter.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Twitter. 2020.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E. GitHub. 2020.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    DocNow. GitHub. 2020.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    DocNow. GitHub. 2020.

    Not in our library

  27. 27.

    Chen E, Lerman K, Ferrara E. COVID-19 TweetIDs. Harvard Dataverse. 2020.

    Not in our library10.7910/dvn/dkovla

  28. 28.

    Twitter. 2020.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Secon H, Woodward A, Mosher D. Business Insider. 2020.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Muccari R, Chow D. NBC News. 2020.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    CNN Editorial Research. CNN. 2020.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Helsel P, Yamamoto A. NBC News.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    McCann A, Popovich N, Wu J. NY Times. 2020.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Yeung J, George S, Kottasová I. CNN. 2020.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Allen N, Heinrich M. Reuters. 2020.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Twitter. 2020.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Morstatter F, Pfeffer J, Liu H, Carley K. Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose. arXiv.org. 2013.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.