Efficacy and Safety of Sorafenib Versus Supportive Care in Egyptian Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Noha Salah El Baghdady, Lamia Elwakeel, Mahmoud Ellithy and 3 more
Archives of Pharmaceutical Sciences Ain Shams University · 2020
doi:10.21608/aps.2020.45180.1043 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Objectives: Sorafenib is the standard first-line treatment for HCC. No sufficient data exists regarding its efficacy in the Egyptian population being a costly medication that is not endorsed by insurance and hence is not used in most institutions. This study aimed to evaluate the overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and quality of life [QOL] of Egyptian HCC patients receiving sorafenib versus supportive care. Design: A Prospective cohort observational study. Setting: Electricity Hospital, Medical Oncology Department-Ain Shams University, and Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Egypt Subjects: Fifty-five patients with HCC were eligible for enrolment in the trial. Eligible HCC patients were stratified into one of two groups based on institutions’ protocols for HCC treatment. Group (1) received supportive care [n= 20] and Group (2) received sorafenib [n=35]; the patients follow up were continued for one year after diagnosis. Main outcome measures: Patients’ survival, PFS, and QOL. Results: The one-year survival rates were 0.0% and 75.5% [p= 0.008] for group (1) versus group (2), respectively. The median PFS was 5 months and 12 months for group (1) versus group (2), respectively [p= 0.008]. The QOL of the sorafenib group was better than the supportive care group [p = 0.047]. The most common side effects with sorafenib were diarrhoea [42.8%] and hand-foot syndrome [34.2%]. In the sorafenib group, 48.57 % of the patients were requiring dose reduction. Conclusion: Sorafenib was an effective first-line therapy in Egyptian HCC patients with a superior QOL, OS and PFS than those receiving supportive care.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References30
- 25.
29 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.