Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Worldand Paradigmin Heidegger and Kuhn

Mateo Belgrano

Franciscanum · 2021

doi:10.21500/01201468.4716 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to compare Heidegger's philosophy of science with that of Thomas Kuhn. This comparison has two objectives: 1) to use Kuhn's conceptual arsenal to make Heidegger's position clearer; and 2) to show that Heidegger's and Kuhn's positions are not as different as might be expected. Consequently, I may suggest that these philosophies can be compatible. I will show that while there are differences, also there are many continuities. I will address three issues: 1) the differences and similarities between Kuhn's notion of the paradigm and Heidegger's notion of the world; 2) the analogous concepts of «normal science» and «calculating thought»; and 3) the sourceof intelligibility in both authors. The main difference between the two thinkers, I believe, lies therein

Abstract licence: CC BY-SA

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.