Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

COMPARATION OF WAREHOUSE RECEIPT, PAWN AND FIDUCIARY IN THE SECURITY LAW PERSPECTIVE

Iswi Hariyani

Yustisia · 2017

doi:10.20961/yustisia.v6i3.7232 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) has been used in Indonesia as an instruments of trade and finance to agribusiness commodities since the enactment of Law UU 9/2006 and PBI 9/2007. Bank Indonesia Regulation No 9 of 2007, Article 46 letter f, allows the use of Warehouse Receipt as a credit collateral. Implementation of Warehouse Receipt System is expected to help farmers, planters, fishermen who have often had difficulty costs at harvest time. As securities, Warehouse Receipt can also be used as an investment instrument in the commodity market. This research aims to find answers of three main problem. First, to examine legal position of Warehouse Receipt in Security Law perspective. Second, to examine differences and similarities of Warehouse Receipt collateral to the Pawn guarantees. Third, to examine differences and similarities between Warehouse Receipt collateral with Fiduciary guarantees. Key word: security law, warehouse receipt, pawn, fiduciary

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.