The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has emerged worldwide as an indispensable resource to improve the surveillance of patients, curb the spread of disease, facilitate timely identification and management of ill people, but, most importantly, guarantee the continuity of care of frail patients with multiple chronic diseases. Although during COVID-19 telemedicine has thrived, and its adoption has moved forward in many countries, important gaps still remain. Major issues to be addressed to enable large scale implementation of telemedicine include: (1) establishing adequate policies to legislate telemedicine, license healthcare operators, protect patients’ privacy, and implement reimbursement plans; (2) creating and disseminating practical guidelines for the routine clinical use of telemedicine in different contexts; (3) increasing in the level of integration of telemedicine with traditional healthcare services; (4) improving healthcare professionals’ and patients’ awareness of and willingness to use telemedicine; and (5) overcoming inequalities among countries and population subgroups due to technological, infrastructural, and economic barriers. If all these requirements are met in the near future, remote management of patients will become an indispensable resource for the healthcare systems worldwide and will ultimately improve the management of patients and the quality of care.

References 140

1. 1.

   Arshad Ali S, Bin Arif T, Maab H, et al. Global interest in telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of Google Trends™. Cureus. 2020;12:e10487.

   Not in our library10.7759/cureus.10487

2. 2.

   Keesara S, Jonas A, Schulman K. Covid-19 and Health Care’s digital revolution. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:e82.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmp2005835

3. 3.

   Latifi R, Doarn CR. Perspective on COVID-19: finally, telemedicine at center stage. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26:1106-9.

   Not in our library10.1089/tmj.2020.0132

4. 4.

   Watson AR, Wah R, Thamman R. The value of remote monitoring for the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26:1110-2.

   Not in our library10.1089/tmj.2020.0134

5. 5.

   Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Shaw S, Morrison C. Video consultations for covid-19. BMJ. 2020;368:m998.

   Not in our library10.1136/bmj.m998

6. 6.
   Adoption of Digital Technologies in Health Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review of Early Scientific Literature · 2020

   No notice
7. 7.
   Applications of digital health for public health responses to COVID-19: a systematic scoping review of artificial intelligence, telehealth and related technologies · 2021

   No notice
8. 8.
   Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review · 2020

   No notice
9. 9.

   Bitar H, Alismail S. The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review. Digit Health. 2021;7:20552076211009396.

   Not in our library10.1177/20552076211009396

10. 10.
    The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence · 2020

    No notice
11. 11.

    Implications of telehealth and digital care solutions during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative literature review. Inform Health Soc Care. 2021;46:68-83.

    Not in our library10.1080/17538157.2020.1839467

12. 12.

    Abd-Alrazaq A, Hassan A, Abuelezz I, et al. Overview of technologies implemented during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e29136.

    Not in our library10.2196/29136

13. 13.

    Grekousis G, Liu Y. Digital contact tracing, community uptake, and proximity awareness technology to fight COVID-19: a systematic review. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;71:102995.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.scs.2021.102995

14. 14.

    Akinbi A, Forshaw M, Blinkhorn V. Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2021;9:18.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13755-021-00147-7

15. 15.

    Davalbhakta S, Advani S, Kumar S, et al. A systematic review of smartphone applications available for Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID19) and the assessment of their quality using the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS). J Med Syst. 2020;44:164.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10916-020-01633-3

16. 16.

    Adams J, MacKenzie MJ, Amegah AK, et al. The conundrum of low COVID-19 mortality burden in sub-Saharan Africa: myth or reality? Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021;9:433-43.

    Not in our library10.9745/ghsp-d-21-00172

17. 17.

    The world health report 2006: working together for health. 2006.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    World Health Statistics. 2021.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Mars M. Telemedicine and advances in urban and rural healthcare delivery in Africa. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;56:326-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pcad.2013.10.006

20. 20.

    Townsend BA, Scott RE, Mars M. The development of ethical guidelines for telemedicine in South Africa. S Afr J BL. 2019;12:19.

    Not in our library10.7196/sajbl.2019.v12i1.662

21. 21.

    General ethical guidelines for good practice in telemedicine. 2014.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    The nurse can see you now: reflections from the South African telemedicine market in light of Covid-19. 2021.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Notice to amend Telemedicine Guidelines during COVID-19 - dated 3 April 2020. 2020.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Townsend BA, Mars M, Scott RE. The HPCSA’s telemedicine guidance during COVID-19: A review. S Afr J Bioethics Law. 2020;13:97-102.

    Not in our library10.7196/sajbl.2020.v13i2.00725

25. 25.

    David NJ, Brey Z, Ismail M. Telemedicine in the Western Cape Department of Health during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic: leveraging data to save lives by activating a telemedicine response. Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2021;13:e1-4.

    Not in our library10.4102/phcfm.v13i1.2954

26. 26.

    Virtual care in Canada. 2019.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    2015 Canadian Telehealth Report. 2015.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Padwal R, Wood PW. Digital health approaches for the assessment and optimisation of hypertension care provision. Can J Cardiol. 2021;37:711-21.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cjca.2020.12.009

29. 29.

    Padwal RS, So H, Wood PW, et al. Cost-effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring and case management in the secondary prevention of cerebrovascular disease in Canada. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:159-68.

    Not in our library10.1111/jch.13459

30. 30.

    House AM, Roberts JM. Telemedicine in Canada. Can Med Assoc J. 1977;117:386-8.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    The Daily - Canadian Internet Use Survey. 2020.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Bhatia RS, Chu C, Pang A, Tadrous M, Stamenova V, Cram P. Virtual care use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a repeated cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2021;9:E107-14.

    Not in our library10.9778/cmajo.20200311

33. 33.

    Dawes M, Beerman S, Gelfer M, et al. The challenges of measuring blood pressure during COVID-19: how to integrate and support home blood pressure measurements. Can Fam Physician. 2021;67:112-3.

    Not in our library10.46747/cfp.6702112

34. 34.

    2021 National Survey of Canadian Physicians. 2021.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    COVID-19 vaccination in Canada. 2020.

    Not in our library

36. 36.
    A rapid synthesis of the evidence on interventions supporting self-management for people with long-term conditions: PRISMS – Practical systematic RevIew of Self-Management Support for long-term conditions · 2014

    Not checked
37. 37.

    What Canadians think about virtual health care. 2020.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    Canada’s Internet Equity Gap: rural residents suffer with inferior service during pandemic.

    Not in our library

39. 39.
    Internet non-use among Canadian indigenous older adults: Aboriginal Peoples Survey (APS) · 2020

    Not checked
40. 40.

    Report of the Virtual Care Task Force. 2020.

    Not in our library

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.