Errata ao artigo “Parto por Cesariana em Grávida com COVID-19: O Primeiro Caso Descrito em Portugal”, publicado em Acta Med Port 2020 Jun;33(6):429-431

Artigo publicado com erros: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/13883 Na página xxx, secção “Discussão”, linha 6, onde se lê: (...) given the conflicting data about pre and postnatal transmission,6,7 a multi-disciplinary team consensus comprising obstetricians, neonatologists and infectious diseases specialists at our institution decided on mother-neonate separation immediately after birth until both were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.4 Deverá ler-se: (...) given the conflicting data about pre and postnatal transmission,6,7 after thoughtful discussion between a multidisciplinary team and the mother, and respecting her expressed will, a shared decision was made of mother infant separation immediately after birth until both were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.4 Article published with errors: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/13883 On page xxx, section “Discussion”, line 5, where it reads: (...) given the conflicting data about pre and postnatal transmission,6,7 a multi-disciplinary team consensus comprising obstetricians, neonatologists and infectious diseases specialists at our institution decided on mother-neonate separation immediately after birth until both were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.4 It should read: (...) given the conflicting data about pre and postnatal transmission,6,7 after thoughtful discussion between a multidisciplinary team and the mother, and respecting her expressed will, a shared decision was made of mother infant separation immediately after birth until both were tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.4

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.