Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 24, 2026.

PI3K/AKT/mTOR and sonic hedgehog pathways cooperate together to inhibit human pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics and tumor growth

Narinder Sharma, Rajesh Nanta, Jay Sharma and 4 more

Oncotarget · 2015

doi:10.18632/oncotarget.5055

Abstract

// Narinder Sharma 1 , Rajesh Nanta 1 , Jay Sharma 2 , Sumedha Gunewardena 3 , Karan P. Singh 4 , Sharmila Shankar 5, 6 , Rakesh K. Srivastava 1, 5 1 Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, and Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA 2 Celprogen Inc. Torrance, CA 90503, USA 3 Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA 4 Division of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA 5 Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, 66128, USA 6 Department of Pathology, University of Missouri-School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA Correspondence to: Rakesh K. Srivastava, e-mail: rakesh.srivastava@va.gov ; rsrivastava.lab@gmail.com Keywords: pancreatic cancer, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, sonic hedgehog, cancer stem cell, Gli Received: July 06, 2015 Accepted: September 22, 2015 Published: October 05, 2015 ABSTRACT Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play major roles in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis. It is evident from growing reports that PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathways are aberrantly reactivated in pancreatic CSCs. Here, we examined the efficacy of combining NVP-LDE-225 (PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) and NVP-BEZ-235 (Smoothened inhibitor) on pancreatic CSCs characteristics, microRNA regulatory network, and tumor growth. NVP-LDE-225 co-operated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting pancreatic CSC's characteristics and tumor growth in mice by acting at the level of Gli. Combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited self-renewal capacity of CSCs by suppressing the expression of pluripotency maintaining factors Nanog, Oct-4, Sox-2 and c-Myc, and transcription of Gli. NVP-LDE-225 co-operated with NVP-BEZ-235 to inhibit Lin28/Let7a/Kras axis in pancreatic CSCs. Furthermore, a superior interaction of these drugs was observed on spheroid formation by pancreatic CSCs isolated from Pan kras/p53 mice. The combination of these drugs also showed superior effects on the expression of proteins involved in cell proliferation, survival and apoptosis. In addition, NVP-LDE-225 co-operated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting EMT through modulation of cadherin, vimentin and transcription factors Snail, Slug and Zeb1. In conclusion, these data suggest that the combined inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Shh pathways may be beneficial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 24, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer has very poor prognosis due to its late diagnosis, silent nature, low surgical resectability rates, and resistance to standard chemotherapy and radiation. Pancreatic cancer is a lethal malignancy with a 5-year survival rate less than 6% and is ranked as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Currently, there are very limited treatment options for pancreatic cancer, therefore there is an urgent need to develop novel and more efficient drugs. Currently, there are very limited therapeutic options for pancreatic cancer, therefore new drugs and novel treatment approaches are urgently needed.

Despite the initial effectiveness of conventional therapies against cancer, metastases recurrence and emergence are major causes of therapeutic failure in cancer patients. These therapies mainly target the differentiated and proliferative cells that comprise the bulk of the tumor. The relapse of cancer is attributed to a small population of cancer stem cells (CSC) residing within the tumor. In addition to resistance to typical therapies, CSCs are reported to have inherently high tumor-initiating potential, which is implicated in tumor relapse, driving primary tumor growth as well as establishment of metastases by CSCs.

Hedgehog (Hh) is an intercellular signaling molecule (polypeptide) that was discovered in drosophila. Hh signaling pathway plays a crucial role in embryonic development from invertebrates to mammals. Sonic hedgehog (Shh) is one of the members of the Hh family, and studies have demonstrated that abnormal activation of the Shh pathway due to genomic alterations leads to an increase in cell survival and metastasis in cancer cells. In fact, higher Hh levels along with enhanced expression of Hh pathway target genes has been identified in different cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, upper gastrointestinal cancer, and prostate cancer. Shh ligands bind to its receptor Patched (Patch) and causes internalization Patch, which in its active form inhibits Smoothened (Smo). Smo positively regulates the activation of Glioma-associated (Gli) family of zinc finger transcription factors, which ultimately translocate to nucleus to induce gene transcription. Expression levels of Gli have been interrelated with the expression levels of the Shh pathway all together, suggesting Gli transcriptional activity is a direct indicator of Shh pathway activity. Oncogenic activating mutations in the components of the Hh signaling pathway have been reported in several cancer. In contrast, inactivating mutations have been found in Patch1 associated with Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome. Gorlin-Goltz Syndrome patients develop basal cell carcinomas and have higher risk of developing rhabdomyosarcoma and medulloblastoma. In agreement with the role of Hh signaling in tumor development, a variety of drugs have been developed in the recent years to block this signaling pathway in cancer cells including Hh antagonist SANTs1–4, Gli inhibitor GANT-61, and smoothened inhibitor NVP-LDE-225.

The Phosphoinositide 3-kinase-AKT-mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-AKT-mTOR) pathway plays an important role in various cellular processes, including growth regulation, and apoptosis. This pathway is a commonly hyper activated in cancer and promotes cell survival, proliferation and cancer progression. mTOR is an important target of Akt and exist in two distinct functional complexes, mTOR complex I and mTOR complex II. mTOR-Complex I regulates the expression of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-binding-protein-1 (4E-BP1),which in turn regulate the expression of Bad, cyclin D1, and Bcl-2. Inhibition of mTOR alone results in cancer relapse due to up-regulation of PI3K activity. Therefore dual inhibitors of PI3K and mTOR may be beneficial for a long-term treatment to inhibit cell growth. NVP-BEZ-235 is a dual inhibitor of PI3K as well as mTOR complex I and complex II and it has shown anti-proliferative effects in various cancers. NVP-BEZ-235 has been shown to radiosensitize prostate cancer cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. It is currently being tested in phase I/II clinical trials in cancer patients.

miRNAs are small noncoding RNAs and have been shown to regulate gene expression. It has been shown that let-7 family of miRNAs plays an important role in cell differentiation, development and tumor suppression. Lin28 is a developmentally regulated RNA binding protein which regulates the biogenesis of let-7 micro-RNA family. Lin28 acts as an oncogene and promotes carcinogenesis. The Lin28/Let-7 pathway affects many cellular processes including the regulation of CSCs, differentiation and glycolytic metabolism. Furthermore, Lin28/let7 axis may be exploited to overcome the radioresistance of human cancers having activated K-Ras signaling. Overexpression of LIN28 correlates with poor outcome, therefore drugs that impact the Lin28/Let-7 pathway could be beneficial in treating cancer patients.

The CSCs demonstrate the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program that has well-established roles in promoting an invasive and metastatic cancer. In the process of EMT, cancerous cells lose contact with surrounding cells, undergo major changes in their cytoskeleton, and acquire a mesenchymal-like structure which assist them with increased invasive and migratory abilities. The process of EMT occurs through downregulation of the epithelial adhesion protein E-cadherin (CDH1), which is repressed by the transcriptional regulators Zeb1, Zeb2, Twist1, Snail and Slug, which also regulate various other epithelial-related genes. Many signaling pathways regulate the process of EMT including the Shh pathway.

The purpose of this study was to examine the interactive effects of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 on characteristics of pancreatic CSCs in culture and inhibition of tumor growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mice. Data obtained from this study demonstrate that the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in inhibiting the self-renewal of pancreatic CSCs by suppressing the expression of pluripotency-maintaining factors (Nanog, Oct-4, Sox-2 and c-Myc) and transcription of Gli. These drugs also co-operated in inhibiting EMT by suppressing transcription factors Snail, Slug and Zeb1. The combination of these drugs was also superior in inhibiting the pancreatic CSC tumor growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mice than single agent alone. These data clearly suggest that the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 is a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting CSCs.

NVP-BEZ-235 inhibits the PI3/mTOR/Akt pathway, and NVP-LDE-225 inhibits the components of the Shh pathway in pancreatic CSCs

PI3/mTOR/Akt pathway plays a significant role in pancreatic carcinogenesis. We therefore examined the effects of NVP-BEZ-235 on cell viability in spheroids formed by CD44+CD24+ESA+ CSCs (Fig. 1A). Primary spheroids were grown in suspension for one week, whereas for secondary spheroids, CSCs from primary spheroids were reseeded, treated and grown for another week. NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited cell viability in primary and secondary spheroids in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited colony formation of pancreatic CSCs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B).

We first examined the effect of NVP-BEZ-235 on the components of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 1C). Pancreatic CSCs treated with different concentrations of NVP-BEZ-235 showed decrease in the levels of phospho-PI3K, phospho-Akt, phospho-p70S6K, phospho-GSK3Kβ, and phospho-4EBP1; whereas the expression of total p70S6K was not altered in drug treated samples as compare to untreated control of pancreatic CSCs. Surprisingly, we have seen a slight decline in the expression of total Akt, total GSK3Kβ, and total 4EBP1 levels at higher doses of treatment with NVP-BEZ-235, which may be due to degradation of proteins during apoptosis.

Shh pathway is constitutively active in pancreatic cancer and plays a significant role in CSC's survival. We therefore examined the effects of NVP-LDE-225 on cell viability in spheroids formed by pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 1D). NVP-LDE-225 inhibited cell viability in primary and secondary spheroids in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, NVP-LDE-225 inhibited colony formation of pancreatic CSCs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1E).

We next examined the effects of NVP-LDE-225 on Gli reporter activity by luciferase assay, and Gl1 and Gl2 expression by q-RT-PCR (Fig. 1F and 1G). NVP-LDE-225 inhibited Gli reporter activity. Gli is a transcriptional target of its own, because Gli1 and 2 contain Gli binding sites. NVP-LDE-225 inhibited the expression of Gli1 and Gli2 as measured by q-RT-PCR. We next examined the effect of NVP-LDE-225 on the components of Shh pathway by measuring the expression of Gli1, Gli2, patched 1, patched 2, Smo and Sufu by Western blot analysis. Pancreatic CSCs were treated with NVP-LDE-225 (0–2 μM) for 48 hrs. As shown in Fig. 1H, the expression of Gli1, Gli2, pathched1, pathched2 and smoothened (SMO) was decreased and the expression of SuFu was increased by treating with different concentrations of NVP-LDE-225. These protein profiles clearly show that NVP-BEZ-235 inhibits PI3/mTOR/Akt pathway, and NVP-LDE-225 inhibits Shh pathway in pancreatic CSCs.

NVP-LDE-225 cooperates with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting cell viability and colony and spheroid formation, and in inducing apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs

We first examined the interactive effects of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 on viability of pancreatic CSCs by XTT assay. As shown in Fig. 2A, NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited cell viability in a dose-dependent manner. The NVP-LDE-225 cooperated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting viability of pancreatic CSCs. The combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone.

In order to check the synergetic effect of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 on the induction of apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs, we treated the cells with these drugs alone and with their combination for 48 h, and analyzed apoptosis by PI staining assay (Sub G0 cells) using flow cytometry. NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone induced apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, NVP-LDE-225 cooperated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inducing apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs. Quantitative analysis of apoptotic cells clearly demonstrates that the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in inducing apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 2C). Further, the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in inducing cleavage of caspase3 into its active form (Fig. 2D). Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) is a substrate of caspase 3 therefore; we next analyzed the cleavage of PARP by Western blot analysis. These drugs showed co-operative effects on cleavage of PARP as well. We next examined the interactive effects of NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 on colony formation of pancreatic CSCs. NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 alone inhibited colony formation of pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 2E and 2F), but when used in combination these drugs inhibited colony formation to a higher extent. These data demonstrate the synergetic anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 on pancreatic CSCs.

Spheroid formation in suspension is one of the characteristics of CSCs. We therefore examined the interactive effects of NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 on spheroid formation of pancreatic CSCs. NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 alone inhibited spheroid formation of pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 2G). Furthermore, the combination of NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 was more effective in inhibiting spheroid formation than single agent alone. These data suggest that NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ235 cooperates together to inhibit cell viability, and colony and spheroid formation, and to induce apoptosis.

Regulation of cell survival-, cell cycle- and apoptosis-related genes by NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 in pancreatic cancer stem cells

Based upon results obtained from apoptosis and cell viability, we next examined the expression of key regulatory proteins behind this process. We examined the effects of NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 on the expression of Bcl-2, XIAP, BMI1 and CCND1 by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2H). NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited the expression of Bcl-2, XIAP, BMI1 and CCND1 in pancreatic CSCs. Furthermore, NVP-LDE-225 cooperated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting the expression of these genes.

We further explored the combination effects of these drugs on the expression of proteins that regulate cell survival, cell proliferation, apoptosis and cell cycle by the Western blot analysis (Fig. 2I). NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited the expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, cIAP1, cIAP2, and cyclin D1 in pancreatic CSCs. NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 upregulated the expression of Bim in pancreatic CSCs. Furthermore, the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in inhibiting the expression of Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, cIAP1, cIAP2 and cyclin D1. These data suggest that inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Shh pathways together may be clinically beneficial for modulation of genes which regulate cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis and cell cycle in pancreatic CSCs.

The combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in suppressing Shh pathway

Aberrant activation of PI3K/mTOR and Shh signaling pathways play important roles in tumorigenesis and progression of tumors. The expression of Gli can be regulated by both canonical (Shh) and non-canonical (PI3K/Akt) pathways. Inhibition of PI3K/AKT pathway can inhibit Gli transcription activity through non-canonical pathway. We first examined the interactive effects of BEZ235 and LDE225 on Gli reporter activity in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 2J). The combination of BEZ235 and LDE225 was superior than single agent alone in inhibiting Gli reporter activity. The expressions of Gli, Patched 1 and Patched 2 are transcriptionally regulated by Gli. We therefore examined the effects of NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 on the expression of Gli1, Gli2, Patched1 and Patched2 in pancreatic CSCs. NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited the expression of Gli1, Gli2, Patched1 and Patched2 as measured by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2K). Furthermore, the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 had superior inhibitory effects on the expression of Gli1, Gli2, Patched1 and Patched2. These data suggest that BEZ235 and LDE225 can inhibit self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs by targeting Shh pathway.

NVP-LDE-225, NVP-BEZ-235 and their combination inhibit cell viability in spheroids formed by pancreatic CSCs isolated from humans, and KrasG12D; Trp53LSL-R172H/+PDAC (Pankras/p53) mice

Spheroid formation in suspension is one of the characteristics of CSCs. KrasG12D/p53 mice mimic pancreatic cancer development in humans. We have recently reported that pancreatic CSCs isolated from KrasG12D mice are phenotypically similar and also respond to anticancer drugs as pancreatic CSCs isolated from humans. Since CSCs play a major role in cancer initiation, progression, metastasis and drug resistance, they can be used to assess the response of anticancer drugs. We next examined the effects of NVP-LDE-225, NVP-BEZ-235 and their combination on growth of human pancreatic CSCs by measuring cell viability in spheroids (Fig. 3A). NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited cell viability of primary, secondary and tertiary spheroids formed by human pancreatic CSCs. Furthermore, NVP-LDE-225 cooperated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting cell viability of primary, secondary and tertiary spheroids. These data suggest that the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 may be beneficial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting CSCs.

We next examined whether the pancreas of Pankras/p53 mouse harbor CSCs, and whether they are capable of self-renewing and respond to BEZ235 and LDE225 in vitro (Fig. 3B). BEZ235 and LDE225 inhibited the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs isolated from Pankras/p53 mice in a cooperative manner, as measured by formation of primary, secondary and tertiary spheroids in suspension, and cell viability in those spheroids. These data suggest that combined inhibition of PI3K/mTOR and Shh pathways is superior than single pathway inhibition in suppressing the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs isolated from Pankras/p53 mice.

NVP-LDE-225, and NVP-BEZ-235 cooperate together to regulate the expression of pluripotency maintaining factors in pancreatic CSCs

Sox-2, Nanog, c-Myc, and Oct-4 are the transcription factors which regulate the self-renewal capacity of CSCs. Inhibition of these genes retards cell proliferation and inhibits tumor growth. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of these transcription factors in pancreatic CSCs treated with NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone and in combination. Pancreatic CSCs were exposed to NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone and with their combination for 36 h and then expression of Nanog, Oct-4, c-Myc and Sox-2 was measured by qRT-PCR. NVP-LDE-225 or NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited the expression of Nanog, Oct-4, c-Myc and Sox-2 at transcriptional level in pancreatic CSCs; further, even higher inhibition was observed in the expression of these factors in samples treated with combination of these drugs (Fig. 3C).

We further validated the data obtained from qRT-PCR by the Western blot analysis, where NVP-LDE-225 co-operated with NVP-BEZ-235 in inhibiting the expression of Nanog, Oct-4, c-Myc and Sox-2 in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 3D). In addition, we studied the interactive effects of these drugs on the expression of Nanog, Oct-4, c-Myc and Sox-2 in pancreatic CSC spheroids by immunocytochemistry (Fig. 3E and 3F), where these drugs inhibited the expression of Nanog, Oct-4, c-Myc and Sox-2 in pancreatic CSC spheroids. These data suggest that inhibition of the Shh pathway and PI3/Akt/mTOR pathways can suppress the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs by inhibiting the factors required for maintaining pluripotency of pancreatic CSCs.

NVP-LDE-225, NVP-BEZ-235 and their combination inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic CSCs

As CSCs appear to have a significant role in early metastasis, we pursued to examine the effects of NVP-LDE-225, NVP-BEZ-235 and their combination on EMT of pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 4). These drugs inhibited cell motility and migration of pancreatic CSCs, and their combination showed superior effects in suppressing CSC's motility and migration (Fig. 4A and 4B). We also analyzed the expression of transcription factors involved in the process of EMT (Fig. 4C–4E). NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited the expression of Snail, Slug and Zeb1 as analyzed by qRT-PCR. Furthermore, the combined inhibitory effects of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 on Snail, Slug and Zeb1 expression was significantly higher than single agent alone. These findings suggest that combination of NVP-LDE-25 and NVP-BEZ-235 can inhibit events behind early metastasis with pancreatic CSCs.

Regulation of microRNA network by NVP-BEZ-235 and/or NVP-LDE-225 in human pancreatic cancer stem cells

Recent studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in regulation of stem cell self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation, and their aberrances cause the formation of CSCs which promote cancer initiation, progression and metastasis. We therefore examined the effects of NVP-BEZ-235 and/or NVP-LDE-225 on the expression of miRNA in pancreatic CSCs, and also performed bio-functional analysis and identified regulatory network based on global expression of miRNAs. NVP-BEZ-235 (NVP-BEZ-235 vs control) induced the expression of 18 miRNAs and inhibited the expression of 9 miRNAs in pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 5A). Based on bio-function analysis, NVP-BEZ-235 regulated those miRNAs which control hereditary disorder, cancer gastrointestinal disorder, developmental disorder, metabolic disorder, cellular growth and proliferation, cellular development, cell death and survival, inflammatory disease, tumor morphology, cell cycle, connective tissue disorders, cellular movement, tissue development, and inflammatory response (Fig. 5B). Network analysis has identified the regulation of mainly TP53, CASP6, ARID3A, HK2, PERP, ZNF385A, SMO, E2F3, CDC25A, LIN28A, EIF2C2, CDK6, PTEN, BMP1, LOXL2, SFRP1, EMILN2, KRT19, JARID2, and ABTB4 (Fig. 5C).

NVP-LDE-225 (NVP-LDE-225 vs control) induced the expression of 5 miRNAs and inhibited the expression of 16 miRNAs in Pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 5D). Based on bio-function analysis, NVP-LDE-225 regulated those miRNAs which control cancer, gastrointestinal disease, hepatic system disease, hereditary disorder, developmental disorder, cell cycle, connective tissue disorders, inflammatory disease, inflammatory response, cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, connective tissue development and function, tissue development, cell death and survival, metabolic disease, cellular movement and tumor morphology (Fig. 5E). Network analysis has identified the regulation of mainly EIF2C2, EIF2C1, EIF2C8, TNRC6B, TNRC6C, LIN28A, ILF3, TCF4, DICER1, 25-hydroxy vitamin D3, TCL1A and SSB (Fig. 5F).

The combination of NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 (NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 vs control) induced the expression of 50 miRNAs and inhibited the expression of 4 miRNAs in Pancreatic CSCs (Fig. 5G). Heat map demonstrated the differential expression of miRNA expression in NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235-treated pancreatic CSCs. Based on bio-function analysis, NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 together modulated those miRNAs which regulate cancer, gastrointestinal disease, inflammatory disease, inflammatory response, metabolic disease, connective tissue disorders, hereditary disorder, hepatic system disease, cell death and survival, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, tissue development, tumor morphology, cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, tissue morphology, cell cycle, cell morphology and developmental disorders (Fig. 5H). We have identified two main regulatory network in cells treated with the combination of NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 (Fig. 5I). Analysis of network 1 has identified the regulation of YBX1, PCB2, JARID2, MYC, RB1, CDK6, E2F3, LIN28A, TCF4, EIF2C2, NCL, MECOM and TMEM8B. Furthermore analysis of network 2 has identified Smad2/3, MADD, TNF, insulin, CFLAR, RABL2B, SERP1, IL-10, CTSC, SERP1, and SLC225A22. Taking together, our findings define that NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 might play a critical role in inhibiting the stem cell survival, self-renewal, and metastasis through regulation of miRNAs.

BEZ235 and LDE225 regulate Lin28/Let7a/Kras axis in pancreatic CSCs

Lin28/Let-7 pathway regulates several biological processes, such as differentiation of stem cell, invasion and metastasis, aerobic glycolysis, and tumorigenesis. We therefore examined whether treatment of CSCs with NVP-BEZ-235 and/or NVP-LDE-225 regulate the expression of Lin28, let7 and Kras. NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 alone inhibited the expression of Lin28a and Kras, and induced the expression of Let7a (Fig. 6A–6C). The combination of NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 was more effective in inhibiting the expression of Lin28a and Kras, and inducing the expression of Let7a. These data suggest that targeting of Lin28/Let7/Kras axis by NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 may be a useful strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

The combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 was superior than single agent alone in inhibiting pancreatic CSC tumor growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mice

Since NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited cell viability, spheroid and colony formation, and induced apoptosis in pancreatic CSCs, we next sought to examine their effects on pancreatic CSC xenografted tumor growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mouse model. Pancreatic CSCs were injected subcutaneously into NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mice. After tumor formation, mice were treated with saline, NVP-LDE-225 (40 mg/kg), NVP-BEZ-235 (20 mg/kg) or combination of both drugs intraperitoneally 5 days/week for 4 weeks. NVP-LDE-225, and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited tumor growth (as judged by tumor weight), and their combination had superior effects on tumor growth inhibition (Fig. 7A). Mice weight were also checked during the course of the study, which remained normal and therefore these drugs alone or in combination had no adverse effect on the health of the mice (data not shown).

Since NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited pancreatic CSC's tumor growth in mice, we next sought to examine the molecular mechanisms of action of these drugs. We first measured the expression of proteins involved in maintaining pluripotency of pancreatic CSCs by the Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 7B, NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 alone inhibited the expression of c-Myc, Sox-2, Nanog and Oct-4 in tumor samples. However, the combination of these drugs was more effective in inhibiting the expression of these proteins than single agent alone.

Further, we also analyzed the expression of Bcl-2 protein family in tumor samples by Western blot analysis (Fig. 7C). The expression of Bcl-2 was reduced whereas the expression of Bad, Bax, and Bak was found to be higher in tumor samples treated with these drugs. The amount of cleaved caspase 3, and cleaved caspase9 were also found to increase in tumor samples treated with NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 (Fig. 7D). These data suggest that NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited CSC's tumor growth by modulating Bcl-2 family members and activating caspases.

The process of metastasis initiation requires invasion, which is enabled by EMT. Carcinoma cells in primary tumor lose cell-cell adhesion mediated by E-cadherin repression and break through the basement membrane, and enter in bloodstream through intravasation. Therefore, we examined the expression of EMT-related proteins by measuring the expression of E-cadherin, Vimentin, Slug and Snail. The expression of E-cadherin was higher in tumor samples derived from NVP-LDE-225 or NVP-BEZ-235 treated mice. Furthermore, the E-cadherin expression was even higher in tumor samples derived from mice treated with the combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 (Fig. 7E). Conversely, the expression of Vimentin was found to be lower in tumor samples derived from NVP-LDE-225 or NVP-BEZ-235 treated mice, and even lesser in tumors where combination of these drugs was used. Since NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 were effective in regulating the expression of E-cadherin and Vimentin. We also measured the expression of EMT-related transcription factors Snail, and Slug. As analyzed by the Western blot analysis, the expression of both of these transcription factors was decreased in the tumor tissue derived from NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 treated mice. These data from mice tumor tissue indicate that both NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 can lower the potential of early metastasis events, and combination of both drugs can lower this process to even higher extant.

DISCUSSION

Tumors arise from a small population of cancer cells (usually less than 5% of cells of a tumor) that have properties of adult stem cells, particularly the ability to self-renew and multilineage differentiation. These properties bring CSCs at the apex of tumor biology architecture. The CSCs are quite resistant to standard chemotherapy and ionizing radiation therapy, and play a major role in relapse of cancer. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new chemotherapeutic drugs or develop unique combination of existing drugs to achieve the inhibition on characteristics of CSCs. In the present study, we have demonstrated for the first time that combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 inhibits pancreatic CSCs characteristics and xenografted tumor growth in NOD/SCID mice. Combination of these drugs has synergetic effect in the induction of apoptosis through caspase-3 activation, and cleavage of PARP. Inhibition of Shh and PI3K/AKT pathways together may be a novel strategy for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

The PI3K/Akt pathway contributes to regulating a variety of extracellular signals and plays an important role in tumor survival and cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis. Akt is shown to be active in human pancreatic cancer tissues and Akt inhibitors such as ZSTK474 inhibited pancreatic cancer cell growth. NVP-BEZ-235 has been shown to inhibit both PI3K/Akt and mTOR signaling and inhibits tumor growth in various cancers and is undergoing in phase I/II clinical trials for use in solid tumors. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is involved in providing stimulation for cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis and it is has been assessed that this pathway is dysregulated in at least 50% of all cancer types. Our data from this study clearly show that NVP-BEZ-235 specifically inhibits the components of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway by reducing the expression of phospho-Akt, phospho-mTOR, and phospho-p70S6 kinase.

The Shh pathway has many roles in developmental processes; regulates tissue homeostasis, and maintains stem cell populations. But in addition to its role in normal developmental processes, the Shh pathway dysregulation has been shown to cause and sustain cancer growth. Excessive amount of Shh ligand has been detected in many tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract and Shh has been shown to be a critical mediator in the initiation of pancreatic cancer, its progression, and metastasis. Recently, we have revealed that various components of Shh pathway are highly expressed in human pancreatic cancer cell lines and pancreatic CSCs and anticancer agents inhibited pancreatic CSC characteristics and xenografted tumor growth in mice. In this study, we verified that pancreatic CSCs consistently express various components of the Shh signaling pathway, including Gli1, Gli2, Patched-1 and Patched-2, suggesting that the Shh pathway is one of the ‘core’ signaling pathways in pancreatic CSCs.

In the present study, our data shows that NVP-LDE-225/NVP-BEZ-235 alone or in combination inhibited pro-survival proteins, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL, and pro-apoptotic proteins, Bak and Bax, in pancreatic CSCs. Bcl-2 family proteins, which have either pro- or anti-apoptotic activities, and regulate apoptosis, tumorigenesis and cellular responses to anti-cancer therapy. XIAPs inhibit apoptosis that is induced by overproduction of caspases, and XIAP binds to caspase 3, 7 and 9 and inhibits their activity. Combination of NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited the expression of XIAP, survivin, cIAP1 and cIAP2.

Panras/p53 mice have concomitant endogenous expression of transgenic mutant KrasG12D and p53R172 in the pancreas. These mice (about 100%) develop pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas with metastasis in the liver, lung, and adrenals. Pankras/p53 mice mimic pancreatic cancer development in humans with similar genetic and morphological alterations. NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235, alone or in combination, inhibited spheroid formation by pancreatic CSCs isolated from Pankras/p53 mice, suggesting the inhibition of these PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Shh pathways can be exploited in pancreatic cancer harboring mutations in Kras and p53.

Let-7 and Lin28 regulate several biological processes, such as differentiation of stem cell, invasion and metastasis, aerobic glycolysis, and tumorigenesis. The tumor-suppressor let-7 miRNA family has been shown to be universally down-regulated in CSCs, because of abundant expression of the regulatory gene Lin28. Low let-7 levels resulted in up-regulation of oncogenes including MYCN, AURKB and Lin28 itself, the latter through a direct feedback mechanism. Let-7 is required for normal gene expression in the context of embryonic development and oncogenesis. Lin28B/Let7 regulates key CSC properties by modulating the expression of Oct-4 / Sox-2 and determines the efficiency by which normal human oral keratinocytes could be reprogrammed to iPSC. The overexpression of let-7a or inhibition of Lin28 suppressed expression of K-Ras, and radiosensitized cancer cells. We have demonstrated that the Lin28/Let-7/Kras axis is regulated by NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 in pancreatic CSCs. Let-7 may inhibit Kras, whereas Lin28 protein could control the PI3k/AKT pathway. Lin28 has been implicated in the repression of Let-7 and mediates both glucose metabolism and embryonic stem cell differentiation. A recent study has reported the existence of a feedback loop involving NF-κB, Lin28/Let-7 and TNF-α in transformed cells. These studies suggest that Lin28/Let-7/Kras pathway may be exploited to control pancreatic CSC characteristics and tumor growth.

Metastatic growth requires the dissemination of cancerous cells from the primary tumor, followed by their reestablishment in a secondary site. The EMT is critical for development of many tissues and organs in the developing embryo, and numerous embryonic events, carcinogenesis and metastasis. Signals within tumor microenvironment trigger cancer cells to acquire an invasive phenotype through EMT. Similar to cells that undergo EMT during normal development, carcinoma cells switch from a sessile, epithelial phenotype to a motile by losing cell-cell contacts, changes in the cytoskeleton, and acquire a mesenchymal-like phenotype endowing them with increased invasive and migratory abilities. Increasing evidence suggests that EMT plays an important role during malignant tumor progression. Various key molecules present in the tumor microenvironment serve as cytosolic bridges between receptors on the cell surface and nuclear transcription factors to induce EMT. Moreover, many of these molecules have also been found to be aberrantly activated and/or overexpressed in human cancers. Snai1 (Snail), Snai2 (Slug), Zeb1 are EMT regulators which act by repressing the Cdh1 gene encoding E-cadherin. In the present study, NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 cooperated together to inhibit EMT by pancreatic CSCs.

Our results in xenografted tumor demonstrated that NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225 acted in a co-operative manner to inhibit tumor growth and induce cleavage of caspase-3 and caspase-9. Cleavage of caspase-3 and caspase-9 by these drugs would indicate the induction of apoptosis in tumor tissues. NVP-LDE-225 and NVP-BEZ-235 inhibited the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs isolated from human and Pankras/p53 mice in vitro, and CSC's tumor growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rϒ null mice, and synergetic effect was observed when both drugs were used in combination. EMT inhibition was associated with suppression of transcription factors Zeb1, Snail and Slug, and mesenchymal marker vimentin, and upregulation of epithelial marker E-cadherin in pancreatic CSCs. In summary, our findings suggest that combined inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR and Shh pathways will be beneficial for the treatment of pancreatic cancer by targeting CSCs, and further study of these pathway inhibition in the clinical setting is warranted.

Reagents and cell culture

NVP-LDE225 and NVP-BEZ-235 were obtained from Chemie Tek (Indianapolis, IN). Antibodies used against Gli1, Gli2, phospho-Akt, Akt, caspase-3, PARP, E-Cadherin, N-Cadherin, Vimentin, Sox-2, Oct-4, Nanog, c-Myc, phospho-Akt, phospho-PI3K, phospho-p70S6K, phospho-GSK3Kβ, phospho-4EBP1, Akt, p70S6K, GSK3Kβ, 4EBP1, Slug, snail, Snail, patched 1, patched2, Smo, Sufu Bcl-XL, Bax, Bak, Bcl2, and β-actin were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA). Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blot detection reagents were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Corporation (Waltham, MA).

Isolation and characterization of CD44+CD24+ESA+ pancreatic CSCs have been described elsewhere. Pancreatic CSCs were grown in well-defined stem cell culture medium.

Cell viability and apoptosis assays

Cell viability was determined by the XTT assay as described elsewhere. Briefly, pancreatic CSCs (5 × 104) were incubated with 1 μM of NVP-BEZ-235, 5 μM of NVP-LDE-225, and combination of NVP-LDE-225 (5 μM) and NVP-BEZ-235 (1 μM) in 250 μl of culture medium in 96-well plate for 48 h. 50 μl of freshly prepared XTT-PMS labeling mixture was added to the cell culture. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm with correction at 650 nm. The cell viability was expressed as OD (OD450–OD650).

The apoptosis of pancreatic CSCs was determined by FACS analysis of propidium iodide (PI)-stained cells. Briefly, pancreatic CSCs were grown in 6 well plate and NVP-LDE-225, NVP-BEZ-235 and their combination were added in the media. After 48 h of incubation, cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, resuspended in 200 μl PBS with 10 μl RNAase (10 mg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. At the end of incubation, 50 μl PI solution was added and cells were analyzed for apoptosis using a flow cytometry (Accuri C6 flow cytometer, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Motility assay

Cell motility assay was performed as described elsewhere. In brief, pancreatic CSCs were grown in monolayer and then a scratch was made with a pipette tip. After washing twice with PBS, CSCs were treated with or without NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235. Pancreatic CSCs migrate into the scratch area as single cells from the confluent sides. The width of the scratch gap was viewed under the microscope in four separate areas. Three replicate wells from a six-well plate were used for each experimental condition.

Transwell migration assay

Cell migration assay was performed as described elsewhere.

Tumor spheroid assay and Immunocytochemistry

Tumor spheroid assay was performed as described elsewhere. In brief, pancreatic CSCs were grown in six-well ultralow attachment plates (Corning Inc.) at a density of 1000 cells/ml in well-defined pancreatic CSC medium at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. NVP-LDE-225 (5 μM), NVP-BEZ-235 (1 μM) or their combination was added to each well. Similarly, for secondary spheroids, CSCs from spheroids were reseeded and treated with drugs for another 7 days. For tertiary spheroids, CSCs from spheroids were reseeded and treated with drugs for another 7 days. Immunocytochemistry of pancreatic CSCs was performed as we described elsewhere.

RNA isolation and mRNA expression analysis by qRT-PCR

RNA isolation and qRT-PCR analysis were performed as described elsewhere.

MicroRNA array analysis

The expression levels of expressed miRNAs were measured using Affymetrix GeneChip miRNA 3.0 arrays. Only probe sets of human small-RNAs in the array were used for the analysis. They constituted 1,733 human mature miRNAs, 2,216 human snoRNAs and scaRNAs and 1,658 human pre-miRNAs. These probe sets were background corrected, normalized and summarized using the Robust Multichip Average (RMA) procedure. The resulting log (base 2) transformed signal intensities were used for ascertaining differentially expressed miRNAs. The significance of the difference in expression between the different treatment groups was ascertained by fitting the data to the one-way ANOVA model, Yij = μ + Treatmenti + Ɛij, Where Yij represents the jth observation on the ith treatment group, μ is the common effect for the whole experiment and εij represents the random error present in the jth observation on the ith category. The Fisher's Least Significant Difference (FSD) test was used to compare the group means of NVP-BEZ-235, NVP-LDE-225 and the combined NVP-BEZ-235 and NVP-LDE-225, to the Control group. All samples were analyzed in biological duplicates.

Functional analysis

Biological functional and network analysis of the miRNAs was carried out using the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis software (IPA, Ingenuity Systems, version 7.6 (http://www.ingenuity.com)).

Generation of KrasG12D; Trp53LSL-R172H/+ PDAC mice

Pdx1-Cre mice (generated by Dr. Lowy, University of Cincinnati) were purchased from the Jackson laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). LSL-Trp53R172H and LSL-KrasG12D/+ mice were obtained from MMHCC, NCI/NIH. All of these genetically engineered mice were bred and genotyped for the presence of Kras, p53, and Cre. Six-week-old breeding pairs of genetically engineered mice, including transgenic Pdx1-Cre, LSLTrp53 R172H, and LSL-KrasG12D mice were used for breeding. To produce compound transgenic Pankras/p53 mice, the double transgenic LSLKrasG12D/+-LSL-Trp53R172/+ mice were first generated, and then further mated with heterozygous Pdx1-Cre transgenic mice. Pancreatic CSCs were isolated from the Pankras/p53 mice as we described elsewhere.

Antitumor activity of NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235 on pancreatic CSC's tumor xenograft in NOD/SCID/IL2Rγ null mice

NOD/SCID/IL2Rϒ null mice were used in this study because these mice are better predictor for the biological response to therapy. Human pancreatic CSCs (1 × 106 cells mixed with Matrigel, Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA, in 75 μl total volume, 50:50 ratio) were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of 4–6 weeks old NOD/SCID IL2Rγ null mice. After tumor formation, mice were treated with NVP-LDE-225 (40 mg/kg body weight), and/or NVP-BEZ-235 (20 mg/kg body weight), by intraperitoneal injections, 5 times per week for 4 weeks. At the end of the experiment, mice were euthanized, tumors were isolated, measurements were taken and tissues were processed for biochemical analysis.

Western blot analysis

Pancreatic CSCs treated with NVP-LDE-225 and/or NVP-BEZ-235, and homogenized tumor samples were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail. Crude protein was resolved on SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). After protein transfer, the membrane was blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk, 0.2% Tween 20 in 1x TBS (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was incubated with the primary antibody (1:1000) at 4°C overnight with gentle shaking and washed 3 times with TBST for 15 minutes each. The membrane was incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and then washed 3 times for 15 minutes. The blot was developed with by the addition of ECL substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL).

Statistical analysis

The mean and SD were calculated for each experimental group. Differences between groups were analyzed by ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis test, with Dunn's multiple group comparison test. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Supplemental information

Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures.

References 82

  1. 1.

    Iovanna J, Neira JL. Pancreatic cancer: molecular, biochemical, chemopreventive, and therapeutic aspects. The Scientific World Journal. 2010;10:1967-1970.

    Not in our library10.1100/tsw.2010.184

  2. 2.

    Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2014;64:9-29.

    Not in our library10.3322/caac.21208

  3. 3.

    Adhikari AS, Agarwal N, Iwakuma T. Metastatic potential of tumor-initiating cells in solid tumors. Front Biosci. 2011;16:1927-1938.

    Not in our library10.2741/3831

  4. 4.

    Wang Z, Li Y, Ahmad A, Banerjee S, Azmi AS, Kong D, Sarkar FH. Pancreatic cancer: understanding and overcoming chemoresistance. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2011;8:27-33.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrgastro.2010.188

  5. 5.

    Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980;287:795-801.

    Not in our library10.1038/287795a0

  6. 6.

    Stolow MA, Shi YB. Xenopus sonic hedgehog as a potential morphogen during embryogenesis and thyroid hormone-dependent metamorphosis. Nucleic acids research. 1995;23:2555-2562.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/23.13.2555

  7. 7.

    Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM, Tabin CJ. Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science. 1996;273:613-622.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.273.5275.613

  8. 8.

    Machold R, Hayashi S, Rutlin M, Muzumdar MD, Nery S, Corbin JG, Gritli-Linde A, Dellovade T, Porter JA, Rubin LL, Dudek H, McMahon AP, Fishell G. Sonic hedgehog is required for progenitor cell maintenance in telencephalic stem cell niches. Neuron. 2003;39:937-950.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00561-0

  9. 9.

    Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N. Neural mechanisms of attention and control: losing our inhibitions? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1631-1633.

    Not in our library10.1038/nn1205-1631

  10. 10.

    Evangelista M, Tian H, de Sauvage FJ. The hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5924-5928.

    Not in our library10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1736

  11. 11.

    Taipale J, Cooper MK, Maiti T, Beachy PA. Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature. 2002;418:892-897.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature00989

  12. 12.

    Denef N, Neubuser D, Perez L, Cohen SM. Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell. 2000;102:521-531.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00056-8

  13. 13.

    Haldipur P, Bharti U, Govindan S, Sarkar C, Iyengar S, Gressens P, Mani S. Expression of Sonic hedgehog during cell proliferation in the human cerebellum. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:1059-1068.

    Not in our library10.1089/scd.2011.0206

  14. 14.

    Raffel C, Jenkins RB, Frederick L, Hebrink D, Alderete B, Fults DW, James CD. Sporadic medulloblastomas contain PTCH mutations. Cancer Res. 1997;57:842-845.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Taylor FR, Wen D, Garber EA, Carmillo AN, Baker DP, Arduini RM, Williams KP, Weinreb PH, Rayhorn P, Hronowski X, Whitty A, Day ES, Boriack-Sjodin A, Shapiro RI, Galdes A, Pepinsky RB. Enhanced potency of human Sonic hedgehog by hydrophobic modification. Biochemistry. 2001;40:4359-4371.

    Not in our library10.1021/bi002487u

  16. 16.

    Taylor MD, Liu L, Raffel C, Hui CC, Mainprize TG, Zhang X, Agatep R, Chiappa S, Gao L, Lowrance A, Hao A, Goldstein AM, Stavrou T, Scherer SW, Dura WT, Wainwright B, et al. Mutations in SUFU predispose to medulloblastoma. Nat Genet. 2002;31:306-310.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng916

  17. 17.

    Johnson RL, Rothman AL, Xie J, Goodrich LV, Bare JW, Bonifas JM, Quinn AG, Myers RM, Cox DR, Epstein EH, Scott MP. Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome. Science. 1996;272:1668-1671.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.272.5268.1668

  18. 18.

    Frank-Kamenetsky M, Zhang XM, Bottega S, Guicherit O, Wichterle H, Dudek H, Bumcrot D, Wang FY, Jones S, Shulok J, Rubin LL, Porter JA. Small-molecule modulators of Hedgehog signaling: identification and characterization of Smoothened agonists and antagonists. Journal of biology. 2002;1:10.

    Not in our library10.1186/1475-4924-1-10

  19. 19.

    Nanta R, Kumar D, Meeker D, Rodova M, Van Veldhuizen PJ, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. NVP-LDE-225 (Erismodegib) inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and human prostate cancer stem cell growth in NOD/SCID IL2Rgamma null mice by regulating Bmi-1 and microRNA-128. Oncogenesis. 2013;2:e42.

    Not in our library10.1038/oncsis.2013.5

  20. 20.

    O'Reilly KE, de Miera EV, Segura MF, Friedman E, Poliseno L, Han SW, Zhong J, Zavadil J, Pavlick A, Hernando E, Osman I. Hedgehog pathway blockade inhibits melanoma cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Pharmaceuticals. 2013;6:1429-1450.

    Not in our library10.3390/ph6111429

  21. 21.

    Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:550-562.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc2664

  22. 22.

    Kennedy AL, Adams PD, Morton JP. Ras, PI3K/Akt and senescence: Paradoxes provide clues for pancreatic cancer therapy. Small GTPases. 2011;2:264-267.

    Not in our library10.4161/sgtp.2.5.17367

  23. 23.

    Hara K, Maruki Y, Long X, Yoshino K, Oshiro N, Hidayat S, Tokunaga C, Avruch J, Yonezawa K. Raptor, a binding partner of target of rapamycin (TOR), mediates TOR action. Cell. 2002;110:177-189.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00833-4

  24. 24.

    Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, Kim DH, Guertin DA, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sabatini DM. Rictor, a novel binding partner of mTOR, defines a rapamycin-insensitive and raptor-independent pathway that regulates the cytoskeleton. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1296-1302.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.054

  25. 25.

    Kim KW, Myers CJ, Jung DK, Lu B. NVP-BEZ-235 enhances radiosensitization via blockade of the PI3K/mTOR pathway in cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung carcinoma. Genes & cancer. 2014;5:293-302.

    Not in our library10.18632/genesandcancer.27

  26. 26.

    Li JR, Cheng CL, Yang CR, Ou YC, Wu MJ, Ko JL. Dual inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3- kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin NVP-BEZ235 effectively inhibits cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer cell growth through autophagic flux. Toxicology letters. 2013;220:267-276.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.04.021

  27. 27.

    Potiron VA, Abderrahmani R, Giang E, Chiavassa S, Di Tomaso E, Maira SM, Paris F, Supiot S. Radiosensitization of prostate cancer cells by the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Radiotherapy and oncology: journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. 2013;106:138-146.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.radonc.2012.11.014

  28. 28.

    Maira SM, Stauffer F, Brueggen J, Furet P, Schnell C, Fritsch C, Brachmann S, Chene P, De Pover A, Schoemaker K, Fabbro D, Gabriel D, Simonen M, Murphy L, Finan P, Sellers W, et al. Identification and characterization of NVP-BEZ235, a new orally available dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with potent in vivo antitumor activity. 2008;7:1851-1863.

    Not in our library10.1158/1535-7163.mct-08-0017

  29. 29.

    Ceppi P, Peter ME. MicroRNAs regulate both epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells. Oncogene. 2014;33:269-278.

    Not in our library10.1038/onc.2013.55

  30. 30.

    Lin S, Gregory RI. MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:321-333.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3932

  31. 31.

    Bussing I, Slack FJ, Grosshans H. let-7 microRNAs in development, stem cells and cancer. Trends in molecular medicine. 2008;14:400-409.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molmed.2008.07.001

  32. 32.

    Murray MJ, Saini HK, Siegler CA, Hanning JE, Barker EM, van Dongen S, Ward DM, Raby KL, Groves IJ, Scarpini CG, Pett MR, Thornton CM, Enright AJ, Nicholson JC, Coleman N, Cclg. LIN28 Expression in malignant germ cell tumors downregulates let-7 and increases oncogene levels. Cancer Res. 2013;73:4872-4884.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-2085

  33. 33.

    Shyh-Chang N, Zhu H, Yvanka de Soysa T, Shinoda G, Seligson MT, Tsanov KM, Nguyen L, Asara JM, Cantley LC, Daley GQ. Lin28 enhances tissue repair by reprogramming cellular metabolism. Cell. 2013;155:778-792.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.059

  34. 34.

    Alajez NM, Shi W, Wong D, Lenarduzzi M, Waldron J, Weinreb I, Liu FF. Lin28b promotes head and neck cancer progression via modulation of the insulin-like growth factor survival pathway. Oncotarget. 2012;3:1641-1652.

    Not in our library10.18632/oncotarget.785

  35. 35.

    Faria AM, Sbiera S, Ribeiro TC, Soares IC, Mariani BM, Freire DS, de Sousa GR, Lerario AM, Ronchi CL, Deutschbein T, Wakamatsu A, Alves VA, Zerbini MC, Mendonca BB, Fragoso MC, Latronico AC, et al. Expression of LIN28 and its regulatory microRNAs in adult adrenocortical cancer. Clinical endocrinology. 2015;82:481-488.

    Not in our library10.1111/cen.12607

  36. 36.

    Feng C, Neumeister V, Ma W, Xu J, Lu L, Bordeaux J, Maihle NJ, Rimm DL, Huang Y. Lin28 regulates HER2 and promotes malignancy through multiple mechanisms. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2486-2494.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.20893

  37. 37.

    King CE, Cuatrecasas M, Castells A, Sepulveda AR, Lee JS, Rustgi AK. LIN28B promotes colon cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:4260-4268.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-4637

  38. 38.

    Chien CS, Wang ML, Chu PY, Chang YL, Liu WH, Yu CC, Lan YT, Huang PI, Lee YY, Chen YW, Lo WL, Chiou SH. Lin28B/Let-7 Regulates Expression of Oct4 and Sox2 and Reprograms Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells to a Stem-like State. Cancer Res. 2015.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-2215

  39. 39.

    Perez LM, Bernal A, San Martin N, Lorenzo M, Fernandez-Veledo S, Galvez BG. Metabolic rescue of obese adipose-derived stem cells by Lin28/Let7 pathway. Diabetes. 2013;62:2368-2379.

    Not in our library10.2337/db12-1220

  40. 40.

    Ma X, Li C, Sun L, Huang D, Li T, He X, Wu G, Yang Z, Zhong X, Song L, Gao P, Zhang H. Lin28/let-7 axis regulates aerobic glycolysis and cancer progression via PDK1. Nature communications. 2014;5:5212.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms6212

  41. 41.

    Zhu H, Shyh-Chang N, Segre AV, Shinoda G, Shah SP, Einhorn WS, Takeuchi A, Engreitz JM, Hagan JP, Kharas MG, Urbach A, Thornton JE, Triboulet R, Gregory RI, Consortium D, Investigators M, et al. The Lin28/let-7 axis regulates glucose metabolism. Cell. 2011;147:81-94.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.033

  42. 42.

    Oh JS, Kim JJ, Byun JY, Kim IA. Lin28-let7 modulates radiosensitivity of human cancer cells with activation of K-Ras. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2010;76:5-8.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.08.028

  43. 43.
  44. 44.

    Zhang Y, Zhu L, Wang R, Miao L, Jiang H, Yuan H, Ma H, Chen N. Genetic variants in let-7/Lin28 modulate the risk of oral cavity cancer in a Chinese Han population. Scientific reports. 2014;4:7434.

    Not in our library10.1038/srep07434

  45. 45.

    Sosa MS, Bragado P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Mechanisms of disseminated cancer cell dormancy: an awakening field. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:611-622.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3793

  46. 46.

    Alderton GK. Metastasis: shedding is no easy task. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:383.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc3755

  47. 47.

    Savagner P, Boyer B, Valles AM, Jouanneau J, Thiery JP. Modulations of the epithelial phenotype during embryogenesis and cancer progression. Cancer treatment and research. 1994;71:229-249.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4615-2592-9_12

  48. 48.

    Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and pathologies. Current opinion in cell biology. 2003;15:740-746.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2003.10.006

  49. 49.

    Kang Y, Massague J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions: twist in development and metastasis. Cell. 2004;118:277-279.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2004.07.011

  50. 50.

    Yang J, Mani SA, Donaher JL, Ramaswamy S, Itzykson RA, Come C, Savagner P, Gitelman I, Richardson A, Weinberg RA. Twist, a master regulator of morphogenesis, plays an essential role in tumor metastasis. Cell. 2004;117:927-939.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.006

  51. 51.

    Blanco MJ, Moreno-Bueno G, Sarrio D, Locascio A, Cano A, Palacios J, Nieto MA. Correlation of Snail expression with histological grade and lymph node status in breast carcinomas. Oncogene. 2002;21:3241-3246.

    Not in our library10.1038/sj.onc.1205416

  52. 52.

    Huber MA, Kraut N, Beug H. Molecular requirements for epithelial-mesenchymal transition during tumor progression. Current opinion in cell biology. 2005;17:548-558.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ceb.2005.08.001

  53. 53.

    Yoo YA, Kang MH, Lee HJ, Kim BH, Park JK, Kim HK, Kim JS, Oh SC. Sonic hedgehog pathway promotes metastasis and lymphangiogenesis via activation of Akt, EMT, and MMP-9 pathway in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 2011;71:7061-7070.

    Not in our library10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-1338

  54. 54.
  55. 55.

    Fu J, Rodova M, Roy SK, Sharma J, Singh KP, Srivastava RK, Shankar S. GANT-61 inhibits pancreatic cancer stem cell growth in vitro and in NOD/SCID/IL2R gamma null mice xenograft. Cancer Lett. 2013;330:22-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2012.11.018

  56. 56.
  57. 57.

    Huang M, Tang SN, Upadhyay G, Marsh JL, Jackman CP, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. Embelin suppresses growth of human pancreatic cancer xenografts, and pancreatic cancer cells isolated from KrasG12D mice by inhibiting Akt and Sonic hedgehog pathways. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92161.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0092161

  58. 58.
  59. 59.

    Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4:249-264.

    Not in our library10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249

  60. 60.

    Hingorani SR, Petricoin EF, Maitra A, Rajapakse V, King C, Jacobetz MA, Ross S, Conrads TP, Veenstra TD, Hitt BA, Kawaguchi Y, Johann D, Liotta LA, Crawford HC, Putt ME, Jacks T, et al. Preinvasive and invasive ductal pancreatic cancer and its early detection in the mouse. Cancer Cell. 2003;4:437-450.

    Not in our library10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00309-x

  61. 61.

    Hingorani SR, Wang L, Multani AS, Combs C, Deramaudt TB, Hruban RH, Rustgi AK, Chang S, Tuveson DA. Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:469-483.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.023

  62. 62.

    Zhang Y, Zhang J, Xu K, Xiao Z, Sun J, Xu J, Wang J, Tang Q. PTEN/PI3K/mTOR/B7-H1 signaling pathway regulates cell progression and immuno-resistance in pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2013;60:1766-1772.

    Not in our library

  63. 63.

    Briest F, Grabowski P. PI3K-AKT-mTOR-signaling and beyond: the complex network in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Theranostics. 2014;4:336-365.

    Not in our library10.7150/thno.7851

  64. 64.

    Heinemann V, Reni M, Ychou M, Richel DJ, Macarulla T, Ducreux M. Tumour-stroma interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: rationale and current evidence for new therapeutic strategies. Cancer treatment reviews. 2014;40:118-128.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.04.004

  65. 65.

    Thayer SP, di Magliano MP, Heiser PW, Nielsen CM, Roberts DJ, Lauwers GY, Qi YP, Gysin S, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Yajnik V, Antoniu B, McMahon M, Warshaw AL, Hebrok M. Hedgehog is an early and late mediator of pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis. Nature. 2003;425:851-856.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02009

  66. 66.

    Varjosalo M TJ. Hedgehog: functions and mechanisms. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2454-2472.

    Not in our library10.1101/gad.1693608

  67. 67.

    Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, Reddy JC, Yauch RL, Tibes R, Weiss GJ, Borad MJ, Hann CL, Brahmer JR, Mackey HM, Lum BL, Darbonne WC, Marsters JC, de Sauvage FJ, Low JA. Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1164-1172.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0905360

  68. 68.

    Riobo NA, Lu K, Emerson CP. Hedgehog signal transduction: signal integration and cross talk in development and cancer. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:1612-1615.

    Not in our library10.4161/cc.5.15.3130

  69. 69.

    Srivastava RK, Tang SN, Zhu W, Meeker D, Shankar S. Sulforaphane synergizes with quercetin to inhibit self-renewal capacity of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Frontiers in bioscience. 2011;3:515-528.

    Not in our library10.2741/e266

  70. 70.

    Huang M, Tang SN, Upadhyay G, Marsh JL, Jackman CP, Srivastava RK, Shankar S. Rottlerin suppresses growth of human pancreatic tumors in nude mice, and pancreatic cancer cells isolated from Kras(G12D) mice. Cancer Lett. 2014;353:32-40.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2014.06.021

  71. 71.

    Li SH, Fu J, Watkins DN, Srivastava RK, Shankar S. Sulforaphane regulates self-renewal of pancreatic cancer stem cells through the modulation of Sonic hedgehog-GLI pathway. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2013;373:217-227.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11010-012-1493-6

  72. 72.

    Zhao M, Tang SN, Marsh JL, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. Ellagic acid inhibits human pancreatic cancer growth in Balb c nude mice. Cancer Lett. 2013;337:210-217.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.canlet.2013.05.009

  73. 73.

    Van Dort ME, Galban S, Wang H, Sebolt-Leopold J, Whitehead C, Hong H, Rehemtulla A, Ross BD. Dual inhibition of allosteric mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) oncogenic targets with a bifunctional inhibitor. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2015;23:1386-1394.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bmc.2015.02.053

  74. 74.

    Duong HQ, Kim HJ, Kang HJ, Seong YS, Bae I. ZSTK474, a PI3K inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and sensitizes human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells to gemcitabine. Oncol Rep. 2012;27:182-188.

    Not in our library10.3892/or.2011.1503

  75. 75.

    Choudhry Z, Rikani AA, Choudhry AM, Tariq S, Zakaria F, Asghar MW, Sarfraz MK, Haider K, Shafiq AA, Mobassarah NJ. Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway: a complex network. Annals of neurosciences. 2014;21:28-31.

    Not in our library10.5214/ans.0972.7531.210109

  76. 76.

    Berman DM, Karhadkar SS, Maitra A, Montes De Oca R, Gerstenblith MR, Briggs K, Parker AR, Shimada Y, Eshleman JR, Watkins DN, Beachy PA. Widespread requirement for Hedgehog ligand stimulation in growth of digestive tract tumours. Nature. 2003;425:846-851.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature01972

  77. 77.

    Deveraux QL, Stennicke HR, Salvesen GS, Reed JC. Endogenous inhibitors of caspases. Journal of clinical immunology. 1999;19:388-398.

    Not in our library10.1023/a:1020502800208

  78. 78.

    Martinez NJ, Gregory RI. MicroRNA gene regulatory pathways in the establishment and maintenance of ESC identity. Cell stem cell. 2010;7:31-35.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.stem.2010.06.011

  79. 79.

    Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell. 2009;139:693-706.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.014

  80. 80.

    Piskounova E, Polytarchou C, Thornton JE, LaPierre RJ, Pothoulakis C, Hagan JP, Iliopoulos D, Gregory RI. Lin28A and Lin28B inhibit let-7 microRNA biogenesis by distinct mechanisms. Cell. 2011;147:1066-1079.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.039

  81. 81.

    Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871-890.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007

  82. 82.

    Tang SN, Fu J, Nall D, Rodova M, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. Inhibition of sonic hedgehog pathway and pluripotency maintaining factors regulate human pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2012;131:30-40.

    Not in our library10.1002/ijc.26323

Cited by papers we hold 5

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.