Global reporting of waterpipe tobacco policy in online news articles in 2015: a cross-sectional analysis
Lama El Kadi, Mohammed Jawad, Rima Nakkash
Tobacco Induced Diseases · 2018
doi:10.18332/tid/84421 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Background Policy discussions are often articulated through the news media. The aim of this study is to understand how waterpipe tobacco policy is narrated and developed over time in online news media. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of online news articles published in the year 2015. We used the online news content retriever service 'Google Alerts' to receive weekly emails on any news article that contained 'waterpipe' or its synonyms in the title or body of English news articles. We coded text into one of the following themes: taxation, smoke-free law, regulation of content and emissions, health warning labels, bans on advertising, promotion and sponsorship, cessation programs, restriction of sale to minors, zoning or licensing, prohibition, and other waterpipe-specific policy. Results We included 567 news articles from 33 countries. We elicited 14 themes, which we counted 1309 times (mean 2.3 themes per article). The five most common themes were licensing or zoning (24.7%), Smoke-free law (20.9%), prohibition (13.4%), waterpipe-specific policy (9.4%), and sales to minors (7.0%). We report on the dominant policy narratives in six countries: Canada, India, Pakistan, the UAE, UK, and the US. Conclusions Geographical variation in policy narratives can be a useful tool for future policy dialogue around waterpipe tobacco control and prevention.
Abstract licence: CC BY-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.