Noninvasive stiffness assessment of the human lens nucleus in patients with anisometropia using an ultrasound elastography system
Hai-Yan Zhou, Hong Yan, Wei-Jia Yan and 2 more
International Journal of Ophthalmology · 2020
doi:10.18240/ijo.2020.03.05 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
"AIM: To investigate the significance of ultrasound elastography for evaluating stiffness of the human lens nucleus in patients with anisometropia. METHODS: A total of 14 patients (28 eyes) with anisometropia were enrolled. The difference in refractive status between two eyes ≥-4.0 diopters (D) and the difference in axial length (AL) of the eyes was ≥3 mm. There were 5 males and 9 females with an average age of 62±3.3y. The test data of the long AL eye of each patient was included in group A (14 eyes), and test data of the eye with relative short AL was included in group B. Lens nuclear stiffness was measured with free-hand qualitative elastography by independent operators. Strain gray scale and color-coded elastography maps were recorded. In each case, three consecutive measurements were performed and strain ratio was used for statistical analysis. Photograph and sectional view of the lens were analyzed and archived by anterior segment image. RESULTS: In the long AL group, the strain rate in the nucleus of the lens was 0.16%±0.08%; in the short AL group, the strain rate in the nucleus of the lens was 0.54%±0.16%. Independent sample t-test analyses showed that the long AL group lens had a significantly smaller nuclear strain rate than the relatively short AL group, P<0.05. CONCLUSION: The relationship between human lens stiffness and different AL is demonstrated by ultrasound elastography. The long AL is associated with lower strain ratio and less resilience of the lens."
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References22
22 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.