Responsabilidad derivada tras la extinción del contrato de puesta a disposición
Pablo Puente Martínez
REDUR. Revista Electrónica de Derecho Universidad de La Rioja · 2014
doi:10.18172/redur.4142 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
After a brief review of employment historic evolution by means of Temporary Work Agencies and the regulatory framework on which this kind of labour relationships stand, we perform an analysis of contractual, financial and/or administrative responsibility underlying the termination of contract with the user undertaking. Jurisprudence has evolved on the basis of pronouncements on specific situations and has allowed clarifying the circumstances to determine fraudulent procurement. This is important since the nature of the liability which the client company has to bear is directly linked to that assessment. Responsibility for declaring solidarity character upon the occurrence pursuant to articles 43 ET and 16.3 LETT.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.