Progress in Chemistry Studies for Students of Industrial Pharmacy Speciality with Different Learning Styles

<p class="orbitalabstract">The paper goal was to analyse the actual learning preferences of students in the speciality "Industrial Pharmacy" and find correlations between the learning styles and academic success in the study of chemistry. The Indices of Learning Styles by Felder-Soloman’s model were investigated for 1st to 5th-year students. The preferred learning styles do not change in the course of 4-years undergraduate studies and are described by the propensity to active (65-79% out of all students), sensitive (82-92%), visual (75-81%) and sequential (64-73%) manners of study. Master students are more susceptible to the reflective (43% of graduates vs 29% of undergraduates), intuitive (29% vs 12%) and verbal styles (43% vs 23%). No significant changes take place in the sequential-global dimension. The change in the general profile of a group of master students occurs at a stage of additional selection of graduates when they enter their master’s course. Progress in studies of eight chemistry and chemical technology disciplines was compared for students with typical and non-typical profiles. The higher the number of typical styles in learning preferences, the more definite distinction is observed in the academic performance. Students with typical learning profiles usually demonstrate better academic performance in studying chemical disciplines, but the difference becomes statistically significant with increasing the number of typical styles in learning preferences.</p><p class="orbitalabstract"> </p><p class="orbitalabstract">DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v11i3.1395">http://dx.doi.org/10.17807/orbital.v11i3.1395</a></p>

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.