Il ‘lato oscuro’ della Riforma: dalla ‘Riforma radicale’ al Castellio contro Calvino di Stefan Zweig [The dark side of Reformation: From radical Reformation to "Castellio gegen Calvin" by Stefan Zweig"
Flavia Monceri
Open Journal of Humanities · 2019
doi:10.17605/osf.io/sdq8p (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
In this article, I try to show that although the religious and intellectual movements now known as “Reformation” introduced potentially “revolutionary” ideas, even in the realm of political thinking and action, no revolution did actually take place, not least because of the victory of a “normalization impulse”, so to speak. After considering (only) two amongst the most innovative of those ideas, I briefly address the socalled “Radical Reformation”, moving thereafter to a discussion of Stefan Zweig’s Castellio gegen Calvin (1936), in which the Author tries to show the ambivalent character of the Reformation and its ideas – what I have called the “dark side” of the Reformation –, especially when it comes to the issue of the exercise of power, dangerously shifting from (at least potential) revolution to authoritarianism and even tyranny.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.