The precautionary principle: Making managerial decisions on GMOs is difficult
Fredrika W. Jansen van Rijssen, Jacobus N. Eloff, E. Jane Morris
South African Journal of Science · 2015
doi:10.17159/sajs.2015/20130255 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
The precautionary approach of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, if incorporated into legislation of countries as a precautionary principle (PP), could cause great difficulty in decision‑making on genetically modified organisms. No consensus seems to be possible on the interpretation of the PP, as responsibility often is passed on to political decision‑making and, eventually, to court rulings. A case study on the assessment of possible unintended effects of endogenous allergens illustrates the complexity decision‑makers may experience. We review the descriptions of the PP and the debate on the interpretation and conclusions that a number of authors have come to, as a step closer to a solution in decision‑making. South Africa may have to consider the PP in the broader context of its food security needs, which would require improved communication as an additional step in the process of risk analysis.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References73
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 73 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.