Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 22, 2026.

Between a bug and a hard place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical outcomes of Chagas disease

Louisa A Messenger, Michael A Miles, Caryn Bern

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · 2015 · Review

doi:10.1586/14787210.2015.1056158

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, concomitant with successful transnational disease control programs across Latin America, Chagas disease has expanded from a neglected, endemic parasitic infection of the rural poor to an urbanized chronic disease, and now a potentially emergent global health problem. Trypanosoma cruzi infection has a highly variable clinical course, ranging from complete absence of symptoms to severe and often fatal cardiovascular and/or gastrointestinal manifestations. To date, few correlates of clinical disease progression have been identified. Elucidating a putative role for T. cruzi strain diversity in Chagas disease pathogenesis is complicated by the scarcity of parasites in clinical specimens and the limitations of our contemporary genotyping techniques. This article systematically reviews the historical literature, given our current understanding of parasite genetic diversity, to evaluate the evidence for any association between T. cruzi genotype and chronic clinical outcome, risk of congenital transmission or reactivation and orally transmitted outbreaks.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 22, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Background

Chagas disease is the most important parasitic infection in Latin America, affecting an estimated 5–6 million individuals, with a further 70 million at risk. The geographical range of the etiological agent, Trypanosoma cruzi (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), extends from the southern USA to Argentinean Patagonia, where it is transmitted by more than 100 species of hematophagous triatomine bugs (Hemiptera: Reduviidae: Triatominae) to at least eight orders of domestic, synanthropic and sylvatic mammalian hosts. Human disease occurs when infected triatomine feces enter through intact mucosa or abraded skin. Oral transmission is an important secondary infection route, responsible for regional microepidemics of acute Chagas disease in areas often devoid of domestic triatomine species, for example, the Amazon Basin. In recent years, a significant proportion of the infected population has emigrated from rural areas, leading to the urbanization of Chagas disease in endemic countries as well as internationally. Chagas disease is now considered an emergent global public health problem associated with congenital transmission, blood transfusions and organ transplantations.

Following T. cruzi exposure, human infection begins with an acute phase, lasting up to 3 months, during which circulating trypomastigotes can be visualized in peripheral blood films or buffy coat smears. Most individuals are asymptomatic or present with a non-specific, self-limiting febrile illness. Mortality during the acute phase is rare (<1% of cases) and may result from severe myocarditis, pericardial effusion and/or meningoencephalitis. Acute mortality occurs more frequently in infants and immunocompromised patients than other infected persons. Even in the absence of treatment, the acute phase spontaneously resolves in most individuals.

Chronic infection is initially asymptomatic and the majority of patients will remain clinically indeterminate for life. However, over a period of 10–30 years, approximately 20–30% of infected individuals will develop irreversible, potentially fatal cardiac syndromes (chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy [CCM]) and/or dilatation of the GI tract (megacolon or megaesophagus). Early CCM is typically characterized by conduction system abnormalities, particularly right bundle branch block and/or left anterior fascicular block, and premature ventricular contractions. More advanced manifestations include ventricular tachycardia, high-degree atrioventricular block and progressive dilated cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure. Sudden death accounts for 30–65% of CCM-related mortality and can affect patients with end-stage heart disease as well as those who were previously asymptomatic. Gastrointestinal (GI) megasyndromes are rarer than cardiac sequelae, resulting from denervation, decreased motility, sphincter dysfunction and eventual luminal dilatation of the esophagus and/or colon. However, the prevalence of different clinical forms, especially digestive disease, varies considerably between geographical regions.

Clinical staging of CCM

Multiple expert committees have published guidelines for the standard evaluation of patients with chronic T. cruzi infection. All recommend thorough history and physical examination, and at a minimum, a 12-lead ECG. Some committees also recommend echocardiograms and/or barium studies of the esophagus and colon. If all of these are normal, the patient is considered to have the indeterminate form of Chagas disease (IND). The expert committee convened by the US CDC advised that barium studies only be performed if the patient reported GI symptoms, based on the low prevalence of the digestive form of Chagas disease in Mexico and Central America, the source of most infected individuals in the USA. This committee also recommended against performing echocardiograms on patients with no cardiac symptoms or ECG abnormalities, because significant abnormal findings on echocardiogram are rare in the absence of other indications of Chagas cardiomyopathy.

Several systems have been used to characterize the severity of CCM for clinical staging and epidemiological studies. The most commonly cited schemes are the modified Kuschnir classification, the Los Andes classification and the more recent system that incorporates the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association criteria for congestive heart failure staging. All use similar general criteria, including specific ECG abnormalities plus chest radiography or echocardiogram to provide measures of left ventricular size and/or ejection fraction (see comparative table in ). However, many investigators add other modifications based on their own clinical experience, to provide finer scale classification or increase the specificity of staging. Many ECG findings that are listed in these schemes to define early CCM, such as low voltage and right bundle branch block, occur in other cardiac diseases and are fairly common in older age groups, independent of T. cruzi infection status. Others, such as moderate bradycardia and incomplete right bundle branch block, are normal variants in healthy young people. While the most severe stage in any of the common classification schemes (equivalent to advanced congestive heart failure) is highly predictive of mortality, there is no obvious method to verify the clinical or epidemiological validity of criteria for the earlier stages. The use of heterogeneous classification schemes directly impedes comparisons of epidemiological studies of CCM severity and prevalence, and meta-analyses of the relationship between Chagas disease pathogenesis and T. cruzi strain diversity.

A brief history of T. cruzi taxonomy

T. cruzi is an ancient parasite, estimated to have diverged from its most recent common ancestor 3–4 million years ago, and as such, displays considerable genetic diversity. Current international consensus recognizes a minimum of six stable genetic lineages: TcI–TcVI. A potential seventh bat-restricted genotype (TcBat), with genetic affiliations to TcI, has recently been reported in Central and northern South America. Historically, the taxonomy of T. cruzi has been hindered by a lack of standardized molecular typing methods and the use of various alternative nomenclatures (Table 1).

The earliest attempts to characterize T. cruzi strain variation, based on multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE), classified isolates into three major groups or ‘zymodemes I, II and III’, which were later subdivided into 43 ‘clonets’. Subsequent genotyping of additional strains using MLEE, random amplification of polymorphic DNA and nuclear loci grouped isolates into two major lineages, designated T. cruzi I and T. cruzi II. More recently, supported by MLEE and multilocus sequence typing, TcII was separated into TcIIa–e, which were latterly renamed as TcII–TcVI to remove any presumptive sublineage designations. Each of the six former T. cruzi genetic lineages is now considered a discrete typing unit (DTU), defined as ‘a collection of strains that are genetically more closely related to each other than to any other strain and that share one or several specific characters’. However, the criteria for division, number of subgroups, and their precise biological and evolutionary relevance are still a popular subject of debate.

The principal reproductive mode of T. cruzi, in particular the relative contributions of clonality and sexuality to parasite population structures and the evolution of discrete DTUs, is also contentious. DTUs TcI–TcIV form monophyletic clades and TcV and TcVI are known to be recent inter-lineage hybrids. As such, TcI–TcIV are characterized by substantial allelic homozygosity, likely resulting from recurrent, dispersed, genome-wide gene conversion, while TcV and TcVI display natural heterozygosity and minimal distinction, sharing intact alleles from their parental progenitors (TcII and TcIII).

Molecular epidemiology of T. cruzi

Molecular epidemiology studies have made substantial progress defining the phylogeographical and ecological niche of each T. cruzi lineage (Table 2). Sylvatic DTU distribution data are still largely aggregated due to differences in ease of capture between reservoir species, paucity of supporting ecological information and our inability to genotype subpatent zoonotic infections.

In general, TcI, TcII, TcV and TcVI are most frequently isolated from domestic cycles and responsible for the majority of human infections. TcI has the widest distribution; it is the principal cause of Chagas disease in Colombia and Venezuela and ubiquitous in the sylvatic environment, primarily circulating in arboreal ecotopes between Didelphis species and the triatomine tribe Rhodniini, with secondary terrestrial transmission among rodents and sylvatic Triatoma species in the inter-Andean valleys of Argentina, Bolivia, Peru and Chile. Multiple molecular markers consistently identify high levels of genetic diversity within sylvatic TcI populations, and divergent, but genetically homogeneous, strains associated with domestic vectors and human infections.

By comparison, TcII, TcV and TcVI are less genetically diverse overall and appear largely confined to domestic transmission cycles in southern parts of South America. The sylvatic reservoirs of these three DTUs are not fully defined, although TcII has been increasingly isolated from primates in Brazil; peridomestic dogs are emerging as potential reservoirs of TcV and TcVI in the Gran Chaco region. The geographical range of TcV and VI appears to be more extensive than previously suggested, with isolated reports of these hybrid DTUs as far north as Ecuador and Colombia. TcIII has a dispersed terrestrial distribution that extends from northeastern Venezuela to Argentina, where it is transmitted by Panstrongylus geniculatus to Dasypus novemcinctus and other fossorial mammals. TcIV is poorly understood, principally because several genotyping methods fail to distinguish this lineage from others, especially from TcIII. However, TcIV is known to circulate sympatrically with TcI in wild primates, Monodelphis and Dasypus spp. in the Amazon and raccoons and dogs in North America. TcIV is also increasingly detected in human disease, as a secondary agent of Chagas disease in Venezuela, and in recent oral outbreaks in the Brazilian Amazon. As of now, TcIII and TcIV have only been sporadically detected in domestic transmission cycles, but this may be attributable to undersampling and the limited sensitivity of some genotyping methods. Finally, TcBat, a new, genetically divergent and potentially human-infective lineage, has been isolated from Chiroptera species across Panama, Brazil and Colombia.

T. cruzi clinical genotyping: perils & pitfalls

Establishing an association between T. cruzi genotype and clinical outcome is complicated by inherent biological features relating to parasite infection dynamics, as well as the limitations of our current repertoire of genotyping techniques. In humans, triatomine bugs and mammalian reservoir hosts, mixed infections of distinct parasite clones are not exceptional but, in many cases, inevitable. In highly endemic areas, long-term inhabitants are repeatedly infected by multiple contacts with different triatomines, which in turn may have fed on various infected humans and/or mammals, depending on the local disease ecology.

Levels of intra-patient parasite multiclonality might be expected to increase proportionally with vector exposure. However, this assumes a constant force of infection, incomplete cross-genotypic immunity, and lack of genotype interaction (e.g., genotype displacement, reciprocal inhibition, potentiation or recombination), transmission population bottlenecks (as observed in related trypanosomes ) or any additional mechanisms that might alter the establishment of secondary infections. The complexity of natural multiclonal parasite populations is largely unknown and our ability to detect them is restricted by genetic marker resolution. The study of this phenomenon conventionally necessitates deriving biological clones from live parasite populations (by micromanipulation, limiting dilution, plating on semi-solid media or FACS ), prior to genetic typing, which introduces a range of potential adaptation biases, discussed below.

Genotyping of T. cruzi can be performed either directly from clinical samples (blood or tissue biopsies) or following parasite isolation by hemoculture or xenodiagnosis. Due to the scarcity of parasites in peripheral blood, especially in chronically infected patients, the former method has limited sensitivity. The primary drawback associated with parasite isolation is selection bias for particular subpopulations, initially by preferential outgrowth due to faster dividing rates and/or culture media and subsequently by loss of clonal diversity from serial maintenance in axenic culture or animals. Hemoculturing is laborious; recovery rates are usually less than 30% among chronic patients and almost entirely determined by parasite load and distribution within the starting sample. Xenodiagnosis, which can facilitate greater parasite recovery, has also been shown to vary depending on vector permissibility to local strains. Furthermore, due to differential strain tropisms, circulating clones isolated by hemoculture or xenodiagnosis are often genetically distinct from those sequestered in tissues and can vary even between sequential blood samples. Together, these observations strongly suggest that intra-host parasite diversity is routinely underestimated.

A plethora of molecular genotyping techniques have been developed to characterize T. cruzi genetic diversity, with varying degrees of resolution, experimental ease, reproducibility, subjectivity and transferability (Table 3). Typing of genetic polymorphisms in conserved housekeeping genes can define major genetic lineages, while analysis of hypervariable loci such as microsatellites, or kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) minicircles potentially allows identification of profiles specific to individual strains. Choice of typing methodology is principally determined by sample source, research objective and laboratory resources.

Direct clinical genotyping is currently based on size polymorphisms in multi-copy genetic markers, including the nuclear spliced-leader intergenic region, 24α rDNA, 18S rDNA, A10 and kinetoplast hypervariable minicircle sequences (for more detailed descriptions of historical genotyping techniques, see ). One major confounder associated with the use of any multi-copy gene is the level of intra-clone copy number and position homology to ensure comparability between strains. Genome size, karyotype and chromosomal arrangements of tandem repeat regions are known to differ widely between natural T. cruzi strains and even biological clones derived from the same population. Similar caveats affect minicircle-based genotyping, which vary in copy number and complement between major DTUs, are susceptible to contamination and whose profiles are highly sensitive to minor changes in reaction conditions, raising issues of reproducibility. With many of these methods, strain DTU assignment is dependent on absence of PCR products/restriction fragment bands, which can also result from novel variation in as yet untested strains; a typing methodology is only as ‘good’ as the panel of reference strains used to validate it.

Additional genotyping options are available for axenic parasite cultures, including karyotyping, DNA fingerprinting and microsatellite analyses. To date, no single, widely validated genetic marker affords complete, unequivocal DTU resolution, and reliance on only one target is inadvisable given the potential confounding influence of genetic exchange. The availability of reference whole genome sequences has reinvigorated interest in exploring the relevance of T. cruzi genetic diversity to clinical outcomes of Chagas disease. However, comparative genomics of representative T. cruzi field isolates is not yet a reality, as is the case with other more experimentally tractable trypanosomatid species.

Methods for the systematic literature review

To date, few correlates of chronic disease progression and clinical manifestations have been identified, although both host and parasite genetics are presumed to be involved. Herein, the authors systematically review the literature, given our current understanding of T. cruzi genetic diversity, to re-evaluate the evidence for any association between parasite genotype and clinical outcome, risk of congenital transmission or reactivation, and orally transmitted outbreaks.

Independent queries of the literature were performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science v5.15, EMBASE and Scopus, with no restrictions to language or calendar date. To retrieve chronic patient studies, the following search terms were used: ‘chronic’ or ‘patients’ AND ‘Chagas disease’ or ‘cruzi’ AND ‘DTU’ or ‘DTUs’ or ‘lineage’ or ‘lineages’ or ‘genotype’ or ‘genotypes’ or ‘genotyping’. To retrieve congenital studies, the following search terms were used: ‘congenital’ or ‘maternal’ or ‘neonate’ AND ‘Chagas disease’ or ‘cruzi’ AND ‘DTU’ or ‘DTUs’ or ‘lineage’ or ‘lineages’ or ‘genotype’ or ‘genotypes’ or ‘genotyping’. To retrieve reactivation studies, the following search terms were used: ‘HIV’ or ‘transplant’ or ‘reactivation’ AND ‘Chagas disease’ or ‘cruzi’ AND ‘DTU’ or ‘DTUs’ or ‘lineage’ or ‘lineages’ or ‘genotype’ or ‘genotypes’ or ‘genotyping’. To retrieve oral transmission studies, the following search terms were used: ‘oral’ or ‘acute’ AND ‘Chagas disease’ or ‘cruzi’ AND ‘DTU’ or ‘DTUs’ or ‘lineage’ or ‘lineages’ or ‘genotype’ or ‘genotypes’ or ‘genotyping’. In addition, reference lists from retrieved articles were manually checked to identify further relevant studies.

For cohorts of chronic chagasic patients, original research studies that met all of the following criteria were included: at a minimum, patients were classified as ‘acute’, ‘indeterminate’ (i.e., asymptomatic) or ‘chronic’ (i.e., symptomatic) following clinical examination; T. cruzi genotyping was performed on a subset of infected patients, at least to DTU level; and results were reported with reference to a recognizable T. cruzi nomenclature scheme, as detailed in Table 1.

For reactivation patients, original research studies that met all of the following criteria were included: patients were clinically classified as immunocompromised by confirmation of HIV co-infection or following organ transplantation; T. cruzi genotyping was performed on a subset of infected patients, at least to DTU level; and results were reported with reference to a recognizable T. cruzi nomenclature scheme (Table 1).

For congenital patients, original research studies that met all of the following criteria were included: neonatal T. cruzi infection was established at birth, or shortly thereafter, but prior to early childhood to be considered ‘congenitally infected’; T. cruzi genotyping was performed on a subset of infected neonates and/or mothers, at least to DTU level; and results were reported with reference to a recognizable T. cruzi nomenclature scheme (Table 1). An additional criterion (T. cruzi genotyping performed on matched mother–infant samples) was dropped when the initial literature search indicated that it would have excluded all but three articles with a total of 23 mother–infant pairs.

For oral outbreaks, original research studies that met all of the following criteria were included: oral transmission was confirmed on the basis of epidemiological indicators (e.g., familial clustering), incrimination of the contaminated food source, clinical presentation (severe acute morbidity and/or mortality) or exclusion of local vector-borne transmission; T. cruzi genotyping was performed on a subset of infected patients, at least to DTU level; and results were reported with reference to a recognizable T. cruzi nomenclature scheme (Table 1).

Exclusion criteria included articles in languages other than English or Spanish, unpublished reports (including dissertations or conference abstracts), papers presenting solely animal data, book chapters, prospective study protocols and review articles. Patient case studies with sample size <5 were excluded from the analysis of chronic chagasic patients. Because the literature for congenital, reactivation and oral transmission is sparse by comparison, we included all publications in these categories that provided genotyping data from human-derived specimens within a recognizable T. cruzi nomenclature scheme.

Chronic Chagas disease

The earliest evidence that chronic Chagas disease manifestations may differ according to parasite strain came from reports of geographical variation, in which the rarity of megasyndromes in Venezuela compared to central and eastern Brazil was circumstantially linked to radical genetic differences between T. cruzi zymodemes (Table 4). Based on the electrophoretic mobilities of 6 to 18 isoenzymes, ZI (TcI) was the principal zymodeme identified in chronic patients (19/19) and domestic (13/13) and sylvatic vectors and mammals (18/20) in Venezuela. By comparison, in central and eastern Brazil, ZII (TcII) was the most prevalent zymodeme in acute and chronic patients (98/99) and domestic transmission cycles (9/9), but not sylvatic reservoirs (ZI [TcI]: 23/25; ZIII [TcIV]: 2/25). This dichotomy between principal parasite types was reinforced by parallel observations from other regions of Brazil. In Belém, north Brazil, ZI (TcI) and ZIII (TcIV) were incriminated in oral outbreaks and both were found circulating among acute cases (3/7 and 4/7, respectively) and the sylvatic environment (ZI [TcI]: 106/118; ZIII [TcIV]: 6/118; ZIII ASAT [TcIII]: 6/118), while to the south-east, ZII (TcII) was associated with chronic human Chagas disease in São Felipe, Bahia. In neighboring parts of Goiás, Bahia and Minas Gerais, comparable proportions of ZI (TcI) and ZII (TcII) were isolated from acute cases, with similar clinical courses, but only ZII was identified in chronic patients presenting a range of cardiac and digestive symptoms.

Further south, most clinical reports supported the principal involvement of Bolivian ZII (TcV) in chronic Chagas disease. In northern Chile, the majority of patients, regardless of symptom status, were infected with Bolivian ZII (TcV) (64/85 and 101/116 CCM and IND patients, respectively). However, one study in Bolivia detected TcI (clonet 7, 19 or 20) and TcV (clonet 39) in almost equal proportions (17/27 and 10/27, respectively) from both IND and symptomatic chronic individuals. The latter study was one of the first to describe a number of mixed infections (as either a mixed isoenzyme profile or different isoenzyme profiles from sequential parasite samples from an individual patient), including three patients with TcI/TcV (clonets 7, 19 or 20 and 39) co-infections presenting both cardiac and digestive abnormalities. Finally, in Argentina, stronger evidence of a link between parasite genetics and progression to symptomatic disease was reported, with TcV prevailing in the IND form (30/35 [86%]) and CCM significantly more associated with TcI (10/14 [71%]) than TcV (7/37 [19%]).

To date, these remain some of the largest cross-sectional studies in which infecting T. cruzi genotype was directly examined in conjunction with patient clinical data (Table 4). Investigators noted that digestive Chagas disease was frequent in the Southern Cone, coinciding with the absence of TcI and preponderance of TcII/V, and drew a contrast with the rarity of digestive disease and predominance of TcI further north. However, in these studies, very little genotypic data were obtained for digestive patients (n = 16; 5 TcI, 8 TcII and 3 TcV) compared to those with CCM (n = 159; 38 TcI, 43 TcII and 78 TcV) or without symptomatic disease (n = 217; 25 TcI, 30 TcII, 1 TcIV and 161 TcV) (Table 4). Furthermore, some of the aforementioned experimental design and biological limitations must be acknowledged alongside these observations. In all of these early reports, MLEE was performed using lysate prepared from parasites isolated through a combination of hemoculture, xendiagnosis and/or inoculation into animals and in each study, positive hemocultures were obtained for less than one-third of patients (107/391 in Chile and 14/111 in Brazil ). Mixed infections were identified by a handful of investigators who undertook biological cloning of strains or sequential sampling, but were not routinely investigated. At the time, research groups were using separate MLEE protocols (although latterly determined to be comparable ), different and varying standards of clinical classification (some omitting any GI examination altogether), and finally confusing and conflicting T. cruzi strain nomenclatures, hindering any prospective meta-analysis across endemic regions.

With improved molecular techniques and the advent of direct genotyping from clinical specimens, current evidence suggests that parasite strains detected in peripheral blood from patients with or without morbidity reflect the principal lineage circulating in the local domestic cycle (Table 5). However, it should also be noted that due to differential strain tropisms, bloodstream parasites are not necessarily the same genotype responsible for pathology. In studies from northern Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico and Panama, TcI predominates in both IND and CCM groups; a minority of infections in Colombia were attributable to TcII (5/26 IND and 6/41 CCM). The two largest recent endeavors to compare T. cruzi genotypes in symptomatic versus asymptomatic Chagas disease patients were conducted in Argentina (n = 172) and Bolivia (n = 132) and support the association of chronic infection, independent of symptom status, with TcII/V/VI (149/149 IND, 98/98 CCM, 5/5 CCM-megacolon (MC) and 40/44 MC). Despite the use of more sensitive molecular genotyping techniques, results for approximately 30–50% of specimens were missing due to low parasite load in peripheral blood. Additional smaller studies also corroborate these observations with domestic genotypes detected in both patients’ blood and cardiac, esophagus and colon tissue specimens.

One recent method, developed to circumvent some of these technical limitations, is to adopt an indirect approach, exploiting serological detection of antibodies produced in response to DTU-specific T. cruzi antigens, with the advantage of potentially revealing both historical and contemporary infecting parasite lineages. Consistent with genotypic data from the same area, serosurveys in southern endemic regions using recombinant peptides directed at trypomastigote small surface antigen indicate pervasive infection with TcII/V/VI and even a putative association of ECG abnormalities with seroreactivity to this particular protein.

Lastly, on a more cautionary note, three publications from Chile report conflicting genotypic data from patients in longitudinal follow-up after a clinical trial of allopurinol and itraconazole (Table 5). In the first publication, using kDNA Southern blots, more than 75% of the results in both groups were described as ‘TcI + TcII + hybrid’, perhaps reflecting cross-reactivity between minicircle hybridization probes. Subsequent papers presenting nuclear microsatellite genotyping from patients from the same clinical trial, with unspecified degrees of overlap, demonstrated a predominance of TcI (79% of 33 IND and 57% of 28 CCM in; 86% of 28 IND and 71% of 24 CCM in ).

Chagas disease reactivation

Reactivation of Chagas disease may occur in infected individuals who become immunocompromised through immunosuppressive treatment (e.g., transplant recipients) or co-infection with HIV. Reactivation is characterized by increased parasite multiplication, a return to microscopically detectable parasitemia levels and symptoms more typical of acute T. cruzi infection, including meningoencephalitis, acute myocarditis and skin chagomas. High parasite loads lead to more frequent strain identification in immunocompromised than immunocompetent patients. In addition, the loss of immunological control may allow parasites previously sequestered in deep tissues to replicate and return to the circulation. Thus, patients with reactivation arguably provide the best in vivo indicator of the complexity of natural infections in humans.

Compared to results from immunocompetent individuals, the detection of patent mixed infections is striking in some immunocompromised patients, with multiple genotypes in a single specimen or different genotypes in tissue compared to blood (Table 6). TcI, hypothesized to have cardiac muscle tropism, demonstrated contrasting distributions in tissue versus blood in immunocompetent patients (38% in cardiac tissue vs 0% in blood), but was detected at equal frequencies in tissue and blood from cardiac transplant patients with reactivation (31% in tissue vs 33% in blood) (Table 6). This result may reflect unmasking of mixed infections that were below the level of detection prior to reactivation.

Current data are insufficient to evaluate any association between strain and clinical symptoms or risk of reactivation. Analyses need to be designed to account for known risk factors for reactivation (severity of immunocompromise and specific immunosuppressive regimens). The most powerful design is a longitudinal approach, for example, in end-stage CCM patients evaluated for heart transplantation, combined with parasitological monitoring following surgery. However, pre- and post-immunosuppression comparisons are difficult, given that genotyping from blood of immunocompetent patients is limited by low peripheral parasitemia.

Congenital Chagas disease transmission

With improved vector control, congenital transmission has become proportionately more important among chronically infected populations, estimated to account for 22% of new T. cruzi cases in 2015. Even if vector-borne transmission were interrupted today, infected girls and women will continue to transmit the infection to their children, sustaining the cycle across generations in the absence of the vector.

Congenital T. cruzi infection is most often clinically silent, but can cause a spectrum of presentations, including low birth weight, prematurity and low Apgar scores to meningoencephalitis, hepatosplenomegaly, anemia, thrombocytopenia and respiratory distress syndrome. Higher morbidity and mortality rates were described in the 1980s and 1990s compared to more recent cohort data. Clinically severe congenital infection is reported to be associated with higher levels of neonatal parasitemia than less-severe or asymptomatic disease. Congenital Chagas disease is also assumed to carry the same risk of chronic cardiac and/or GI manifestations as vector-borne infections.

Since the earliest descriptions of congenital T. cruzi infection, researchers have struggled to explain why vertical transmission is restricted to only a small proportion of infected mothers. Congenital transmission rates are highly variable both within and between endemic areas, ranging from 4.4 to 11.3% in Argentina, from 3.4 to 17.1% in Bolivia, from 0.2 to 5.2% in Brazil, from 2.5 to 11.1% in Chile and from 5.6 to 10% in Paraguay. Factors now known to be associated with higher risk of congenital transmission include younger maternal age (presumed to reflect more recent infection), maternal and neonatal immunological responses, higher maternal parasitemia, and HIV and other immunodeficiencies; the evidence for any influence of T. cruzi genetic diversity is more equivocal (Table 7). The majority of congenital genotyping studies have been performed in southern endemic areas, particularly Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, and in general, mirror the distribution of TcII/V/VI lineages observed among local chronic adult populations; additional studies are needed from regions of domestic TcI transmission in northern South and Central America.

A number of limitations prevent the accurate assessment of the interaction between T. cruzi genotype and risk of congenital transmission. Studies which examine congenital cohorts frequently perform genotyping only on maternal or neonatal specimens, and those that incorporate both often present results from unmatched mothers and infants. Even fewer studies compare parasite genotypes between mothers who transmitted to their infants and those who did not. Due to the small volume of neonatal blood, most congenital genotyping is reliant on DTU-specific minicircle probes (Table 7) and some studies do not test for all lineages, but only those predicted to be found circulating locally (conventionally TcI, TcII, TcV and TcVI). Cross-reactivity between minicircle probes for closely related DTUs (TcII and TcVI) has been reported, which casts some doubt on studies detecting co-infections with these lineages. Furthermore, most congenital genotyping studies are constrained by small sample sizes and suboptimal sensitivity of current conventional diagnostic methods. Microscopic examination in a single specimen fails to identify over half of infected neonates, and subsequent loss to follow-up is high, thereby routinely underestimating the rates of congenital transmission and providing only a fraction of potential parasite strains for genotyping.

Differential diagnostic sensitivities and rates of follow-up render it difficult to draw conclusions about geographical variation in congenital transmission. Multiple factors, including maternal immune response and parasite load, likely modify risk. Nevertheless, several observations support a contributory role for parasite genotype in congenital Chagas transmission risk. In Argentina, women with one congenitally infected child were significantly more likely to transmit to that child’s siblings than mothers who had not previously transmitted. Considering the extent of T. cruzi genetic diversity at the intra-DTU level, it is unlikely that all representatives of a lineage would be equally permissible to vertical transmission, but it is conceivable that particular parasite clones may be better adapted for transplacental infection. Animal data also support the possibility that some T. cruzi strains are more predisposed to vertical transmission than others.

To date, only one study has directly examined infected human placental tissue, detecting additional minicircle signatures not observed in matched maternal blood samples and tentatively supporting the existence of T. cruzi subpopulations with placental tropism. Others have described parallel discordant minicircle profiles between paired maternal–neonate blood specimens, implying either the generation of novel mutations by rapid parasite multiplication during acute neonatal infection or selective transmission of parasite subpopulations. In the only study to address neonatal morbidity, no significant association was found between DTU and clinical severity of congenital infection, but nearly all genotyped specimens in this study were classified as TcV.

In one of the aforementioned Argentinean studies, women from areas with high triatomine infestation had the lowest risk of congenital transmission compared to those with vector control (intermediate risk) or from urban areas that had never been infested (highest risk). These findings have been confirmed in the Bolivian Chaco region, where pregnant women who had resided longer in an infested house had significantly lower parasitemia and were less likely to transmit to their child, compared to those living in areas without vector infestation. Sustained vector exposure and/or repeated re- or super-infection by T. cruzi may act as an immune booster, allowing women to maintain effective control of parasitemia, thereby decreasing their risk of congenital transmission.

Oral T. cruzi transmission and outbreaks of acute Chagas disease

T. cruzi trypomastigotes in triatomine feces are infectious when ingested by experimental animals, and consumption of infected vectors or contaminated material is considered the predominant transmission modality in non-human mammals. Acute T. cruzi infections in humans attributed to oral transmission have been reported in increasing numbers in recent decades, especially in the Brazilian Amazon. Three basic scenarios are described: sporadic cases in areas with sylvatic but not domestic vectors in which the attribution is one of exclusion; small rural family- or village-based clusters of acute cases traced to shared food or drink; and rare large outbreaks, sometimes in urban areas considered to be free of vectorial transmission, with an identified common source such as contaminated fruit or sugarcane juice. Most outbreaks are small, often affecting family groups in the Amazon region, where the palm fruits açaí and baçaba are dietary staples easily contaminated by infected triatomine vectors that live in the trees themselves.

The largest reported outbreak, attributed to locally prepared guava juice, comprised 103 infections among students and staff at a school in Caracas. Orally transmitted T. cruzi infection appears to be associated with more severe acute morbidity and higher mortality than vector-borne infection. The most frequent symptoms are fever, dyspnea, myalgias, and generalized and facial edema; ECG changes are also common. In the Caracas outbreak, 75% of 103 infected individuals were symptomatic, 66% had ECG abnormalities, 20% were hospitalized and there was one death from acute myocarditis. Among 13 patients infected in two outbreaks associated with contaminated sugarcane juice in northeastern Brazil, 92% had ECG abnormalities, 27% had left ventricular ejection fractions below 55% and two individuals (age 9 and 16 years) died of rapidly progressive congestive heart failure. Among survivors, nearly all cardiac abnormalities resolved after treatment with benznidazole. The higher proportion of symptoms and severe morbidity and clustering of infections may facilitate easier detection of acute, oral infection compared to vectorial cases, and may contribute to the predominance of oral infections in acute Chagas disease surveillance data.

Because of logistical constraints, few outbreaks receive thorough epidemiological investigations, and direct incrimination of the contaminated item is infrequent. At the DTU level, T. cruzi genotypes identified in oral outbreaks principally reflect the predominant lineages circulating in that geographical area (Table 8). In the Caracas school outbreak, molecular typing demonstrated identical TcI strains in 3 of the 103 infected individuals and similar strains in a single P. geniculatus captured at the site where the implicated guava juice was prepared. Human specimens from the outbreak in Santa Catarina in 2005 attributed to sugarcane juice were typed as TcII. Small family outbreaks in the Amazon region generally yield TcIV or TcI, while rural outbreaks outside of the Brazilian Amazon (Colombia, Venezuela, French Guiana) detect TcI (sometimes identified specifically as sylvatic TcI).

Most investigations occur months after the outbreaks and consist of vector and animal reservoir studies in the area of the outbreak, based on the assumption that outbreak vehicles were contaminated by infected triatomine feces or anal gland secretions of infected opossums, which contain infective trypomastigotes. The investigation in the area of the Santa Catarina outbreak (typed in humans as TcII) demonstrated TcI in opossums and both TcI and TcII in triatomine vectors, implicating local triatomines as the most likely source of infection.

Recent laboratory data suggest that parasite contact with host gastric acid may render trypomastigotes more invasive through changes in parasite surface glycoproteins, and that this interaction may underlie the increased clinical severity observed in orally acquired Chagas disease. The T. cruzi surface glycoprotein gp82 is highly resistant to proteolysis and has been shown to mediate migration through the stomach mucin layer and invasion of gastric mucosal cells. Different parasite strains express distinct isoforms of gp90, a second surface glycoprotein, which present differential susceptibility to digestion by pepsin. Strains with pepsin-digested gp90 have highly efficient gastric mucosal invasion and establish patent T. cruzi infections, in contrast to those with pepsin-resistant gp90 which invade poorly. Experimental infection with a Colombian TcI isolate demonstrated efficient oral and intraperitoneal transmission, in contrast to a Peruvian strain (TcV) which was much less efficient by the oral than the intraperitoneal route. Similarly, a strain from the 2005 Santa Catarina outbreak (TcII) was highly invasive, producing a robust infection and high mortality in a mouse model, unlike CL Brener (TcVI) and G (TcI) strains, with these differences attributed to the pepsin susceptibility of the gp90 isoforms of the strains.

T. cruzi lineage in Chagas disease diagnostics and chemotherapy

Diagnosis of Chagas disease in the chronic phase is based on serological detection of anti-T. cruzi IgG antibodies. However, no single assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be used alone; confirmed diagnosis relies on concordant results from at least two tests using different antigens and/or formats (usually ELISA, indirect immunofluorescence and/or indirect hemagglutination). Differential sensitivities to serodiagnostic tests have been reported between Bolivia and Peru, where two different commercial rapid tests based on recombinant antigens demonstrated sensitivities of 87.5 and 90% versus 30 and 54%, respectively. Rapid test sensitivities were closely correlated with absorbance values on whole parasite lysate-based ELISAs. Similarly, low sensitivities of recombinant antigen ELISA and rapid tests have also been reported from Panama and Mexico. No clear correlation between serodiagnostic test reactivity and local T. cruzi DTU has been observed; instead, these discrepancies may reflect weaker adaptive immune responses to parasite antigens between endemic populations.

Current treatment options for Chagas disease are limited to benznidazole and nifurtimox. While both drugs have high cure rates in the acute phase, efficacy during the chronic phase has been much harder to document, largely due to the lack of a timely, sensitive test of cure. Two recent trials have successfully employed quantitative real-time PCR to rapidly detect treatment failure of the new drug candidates posaconazole and E1224, a related drug. In contrast, fewer than 10% of those who completed the 60-day benznidazole course had positive results by PCR during the follow-up period. The posaconazole trial required positive pretreatment results by PCR as a prerequisite for enrollment, while the E1224 trial was preceded by an optimization exercise that achieved 92% sensitivity for PCR using multiple specimens and optimized techniques. These two trials provide strong support for the use of PCR as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials in the chronic phase. No data on T. cruzi strain are currently available from these trials, but parasite diversity was unlikely to be high because the E1224 trial was conducted in Bolivia, and nearly all patients treated in the posaconazole trial in Spain were also of Bolivian origins.

Small human studies, clinical impression and findings in animal models tentatively suggest that parasite susceptibility varies with geographical location and parasite lineage as might be expected given the crucial role played by some genetic loci (e.g., TcNTR) in resistance to both benznidazole and nifurtimox. However, direct human data are sparse and in vitro epimastigote assays have poor correlation with in vivo mouse models of drug response. Natural drug resistance to either drug has been reported in both patient-derived isolates as well as sylvatic unexposed strains. The most comprehensive in vivo analysis of parasite susceptibility was conducted in the 1980s using 47 parasite strains isolated from patients, sylvatic reservoirs and vectors, and subsequently inoculated into mice. In mouse models, cure rates to both benznidazole and nifurtimox were close to 100% for parasite strains from Argentina and the southernmost region of Brazil, where the predominant DTUs are presumed to be TcV and TcVI. In central and Atlantic Brazil, where TcII is likely to be more common, cure rates ranged from 50 to 65%, while strains from sylvatic reservoir hosts and vectors showed highly variable responses.

The inability to dissect the relative contribution of parasite genetics to treatment failure, disease pathology and progression represents a major hurdle to the assessment of novel drug candidates. The advent and optimization of a non-invasive, in vivo, bioluminescent imaging system which can facilitate real-time monitoring of chronic parasite burden has the potential to address these key questions using current and prospective chemotherapies, prior to human evaluations.

Expert commentary & five-year view

Establishing or excluding any relationship between T. cruzi genetic diversity and clinical outcome will require significant improvements in study design and reporting, patient sampling and parasite genotyping (Box 1). As encountered throughout this article, meta-analyses of historical studies are impeded by the paucity (and in many cases, complete absence) of descriptive clinical data among genotyping publications. Use of a standardized CCM stratification method (or supplemental data to allow reclassification) would facilitate comparison between studies. Because of the long asymptomatic period before the onset of clinical signs and symptoms, cross-sectional evaluations will inevitably misclassify some individuals as IND who will later develop CCM; if parasite genetics contribute to the later progression of disease, this misclassification will introduce a bias toward the null hypothesis (‘parasite genetics are not associated with CCM’). This bias will be exacerbated if CCM and IND groups are not matched by age distribution; without deliberate age-matching (individual or group frequency-matching), the IND group will always be younger than the symptomatic group due to the natural history of the disease. Only one genotyping study ensured that the age distributions of IND and CCM groups were comparable; no other publications in this review took this potential confounder into account. Cohort studies of Chagas cardiomyopathy are rare, but could provide extremely valuable opportunities to examine whether T. cruzi strain affects the risk of development and progression, while avoiding the biases of cross-sectional studies. The strict clinical criteria used in the two most prominent current cohorts (the control arm of the BENEFIT trial and the REDS-II study ) should provide a firm basis for interpretation, although thus far, neither has published T. cruzi genotypic data.

The pathogenesis of Chagas cardiomyopathy is widely believed to be multifactorial, with contributions from both parasite and host genetics; evaluating parasite genotype in isolation is therefore likely inadequate. The addition of immunology, human genetics and more detailed epidemiological evaluations could provide a richer assessment of the possible interactions of factors modifying clinical outcome. Similarly, studies of congenital Chagas disease could be made more rigorous by ensuring that both mother and infant specimens are tested, and that the source population, criteria for and age at congenital diagnosis are more clearly detailed in publications. The maternal immune response clearly plays an essential role in modulating congenital transmission risk, and optimally would be evaluated in tandem with parasite strain diversity. Finally, the impact of vector control initiatives, including changes in force of infection and circulating strain compositions, needs to be considered, particularly when comparing genotypic data from the same endemic area over time.

Epidemiological as well as genotype data are extremely sparse for GI Chagas disease. The widely accepted observation that gastrointestinal Chagas disease is much rarer in Central and northern South America than in the Southern Cone still rests on clinical reports rather than quantitative population-based epidemiological studies. In part, this stems from the impracticality of performing barium studies in field conditions and on large numbers of people. A study in Bolivia used clinical swallowing time (by placing a stethoscope on the neck, asking the subject to swallow and timing the duration) to assess prevalence of early esophageal changes; 22% of seropositive participants had swallowing times longer than the clinically established cut-off of 10 s, compared to none of the seronegative participants. If field-friendly methods such as swallowing times can be validated by comparison with barium studies, this could provide a useful tool for epidemiological assessments in conjunction with parasite genetic analysis.

Many articles are difficult to interpret because the relationship between data by specimen and by patient is not explicit. Synthesis of the literature as a whole is challenging because multiple manuscripts by the same authors often present genotyping data from samples from the same source population, without specifying the degree of overlap. Re-characterization of the same specimens in consecutive papers may inflate the prevalence estimates of the resulting DTUs. For all of these limitations, more transparent data presentation would be invaluable. The current ‘open-access’ movement may assist in this area, and could be enhanced by the use of common identifiers between datasets from the same source population to facilitate such meta-analyses.

Modifications to study design must be complemented by parallel improvements in clinical T. cruzi genotyping. As previously discussed, parasite isolation by hemoculture, xenodiagnoses or animal inoculation is not ideal and introduces unquantifiable biases; novel methodologies to enrich T. cruzi DNA in clinical specimens and circumvent loss of clonal diversity during parasite culturing stages warrant further investigation. Crucially, the current repertoire of clinical genotyping techniques is restricted to DTU-level classification and insufficient to explore the potential interaction between parasite multiplicity of infection and clinical outcome. Illumina amplicon sequencing, recently developed to explore intra-host pathogen genetic diversity, involves the generation of millions of ‘short’ sequencing reads from individual samples, potentially allowing correlation of read depth with genotype abundance. This strategy has been used to examine intra-patient multiclonality among chronic Chagas disease patients, across the clinical spectrum (asymptomatic to severe cardiomyopathy, megaesophagus or megacolon) in Goiás, Brazil and matched mother–infant pairs from Cochabamba, Bolivia. While no relationship between parasite multiclonality and patient sex, age or clinical symptoms has been observed thus far, putative evidence of diversifying selection affecting antigenic genes was detected, suggesting a link between genetic diversity in this gene family and survival in the mammalian host.

As yet unidentified, diverse genetic characteristics of T. cruzi may influence clinical outcome. However our systematic review demonstrates no unequivocal evidence for an association between T. cruzi genotype and chronic morbidity, risk of reactivation, or congenital or oral transmission. In recent publications, the most consistent finding is that specimens from all groups reflect the predominant genotypes circulating in the local area. Results from patients with reactivation indicate that mixed infections may be the rule, rather than the exception. Further elucidation of the role of T. cruzi genotype in disease pathogenesis will require improvements in both study design and genotyping techniques.

Clinical and epidemiological data

Use standardized cardiomyopathy stratification scheme and/or provide supplemental data to allow reclassification

Present data on specific electrocardiogram and echocardiogram abnormalities used to define Chagas cardiomyopathy

Present data on age; individual or frequency-matching by age to reduce bias

Test as representative a sample of cohort or other study participants as possible

Include data collection on other potentially confounding risk factors such as vector exposure history, immunological response and human genetics

Incorporate reliable DTU identification into ongoing and future cohort studies of cardiomyopathy and congenital Trypanosoma cruzi transmission

Develop and validate methods for identification of gastrointestinal Chagas disease adaptable to population-based studies

Data transparency

Explicit presentation of the relationship between specimens and patients across publications

Open-access datasets delinked from personal identifiers, but maintaining specimen linkage from one study to another

Application of laboratory techniques

Use of standardized T. cruzi nomenclature, genotyping protocols, shared reference strains, and central, open-access repositories of genotypic data

Genotyping using at least two independent markers to increase sensitivity, facilitate unequivocal DTU resolution and mitigate potential misclassification due to parasite recombination

Improved laboratory techniques

Techniques for unambiguous DTU classification, particularly between TcII, TcV and TcVI

Development of novel methods to enrich parasite DNA sufficiently to enable genotyping directly from low-parasite load clinical specimens

References 341

  1. 1.

    WHO. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2015;90:33-44.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Lent H, Wygodzinsky P. Revision of the Triatominae (Hemiptera, Reduviidae), and their significance as vectors of Chagas’ disease. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist. 1979;63:123-520.

    Not in our library

  3. 3.

    Galvao C, Carcavallo R, Rocha Dda S, Jurberg J. A checklist of the current valid species of the subfamily Triatominae Jeannel, 1919 (Hemiptera, Reduviidae, Triatominae) and their geographical distribution with nomenclatural and taxonomic notes. Zootaxa. 2003;202:1-36.

    Not in our library

  4. 4.

    Noireau F, Diosque P, Jansen AM. Trypanosoma cruzi: adaptation to its vectors and its hosts. Vet Res. 2009;40:26.

    Not in our library10.1051/vetres/2009009

  5. 5.

    Coura JR, Dias JC. Epidemiology, control and surveillance of Chagas disease: 100 years after its discovery. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(Suppl 1):31-40.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762009000900006

  6. 6.

    Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Carvalho NB. Oral transmission of Chagas disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:845-52.

    Not in our library10.1093/cid/cir956

  7. 7.

    Gurtler RE. Sustainability of vector control strategies in the Gran Chaco Region: current challenges and possible approaches. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104(Suppl 1):52-59.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762009000900009

  8. 8.

    Bern C, Martin DL, Gilman RH. Acute and congenital Chagas disease. Adv Parasitol. 2011;75:19-47.

    Not in our library10.1016/b978-0-12-385863-4.00002-2

  9. 9.

    Jackson Y, Getaz L, Wolff H, et al. Prevalence, clinical staging and risk for blood-borne transmission of Chagas disease among Latin American migrants in Geneva. Switzerland. Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e592.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0000592

  10. 10.

    Centers for disease control and prevention. Chagas disease after organ transplantation–Los Angeles, California, 2006. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55:798-800.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Rassi A, Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet. 2010;375:1388-402.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60061-x

  12. 12.

    Maguire JH, Hoff R, Sherlock I, et al. Cardiac morbidity and mortality due to Chagas’ disease: prospective electrocardiographic study of a Brazilian community. Circulation. 1987;75:1140-5.

    Not in our library10.1161/01.cir.75.6.1140

  13. 13.

    Rassi A, Rassi A, Little WC. Chagas’ heart disease. Clin Cardiol. 2000;23:883-9.

    Not in our library10.1002/clc.4960231205

  14. 14.

    Rassi A, Rassi SG, Rassi A. Sudden death in Chagas’ disease. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2001;76:75-96.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0066-782x2001000100008

  15. 15.

    de Oliveira RB, Troncon LE, Dantas RO, Menghelli UG. Gastrointestinal manifestations of Chagas’ disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:884-9.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.270_r.x

  16. 16.

    Miles MA, Cedillos RA, Povoa MM, et al. Do radically dissimilar Trypanosoma cruzi strains (zymodemes) cause Venezuelan and Brazilian forms of Chagas’ disease? Lancet. 1981;1:1338-40.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92518-6

  17. 17.

    Rezende JMF. Chagasic mega syndromes and regional differences In: New Approaches in American Trypanosomiasis Research: Proceedings of an International Symposium, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 1976.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Bern C, Montgomery SP, Herwaldt BL, et al. Evaluation and treatment of Chagas disease in the United States: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2171-81.

    Not in our library10.1001/jama.298.18.2171

  19. 19.

    Gascon J, Albajar P, Canas E, et al. [Diagnosis, management and treatment of chronic Chagas’ heart disease in areas where Trypanosoma cruzi infection is not endemic]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2008;26:99-106.

    Not in our library10.1157/13115545

  20. 20.

    Ministério da Saúde Brasil. [Brazilian Consensus on Chagas disease]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38(Suppl 3):7-29.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    Acquatella H. Echocardiography in Chagas heart disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1124-31.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.106.627323

  22. 22.

    Carrasco HA, Barboza JS, Inglessis G, et al. Left ventricular cineangiography in Chagas’ disease: detection of early myocardial damage. Am Heart J. 1982;104:595-602.

    Not in our library10.1016/0002-8703(82)90232-0

  23. 23.

    Hunt SA. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:e1-82.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.022

  24. 24.

    Kuschnir E, Sgammini H, Castro R, et al. [Evaluation of cardiac function by radioisotopic angiography, in patients with chronic Chagas cardiopathy]. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1985;45:249-56.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.
  26. 26.

    Rocha MO, Ribeiro AL, Teixeira MM. Clinical management of chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. Front Biosci. 2003;8:e44-54.

    Not in our library10.2741/926

  27. 27.

    Sabino EC, Ribeiro AL, Salemi VM, et al. Ten-year incidence of Chagas cardiomyopathy among asymptomatic Trypanosoma cruzi-seropositive former blood donors. Circulation. 2013;127:1105-15.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.112.123612

  28. 28.

    Le VV, Wheeler MT, Mandic S, et al. Addition of the electrocardiogram to the preparticipation examination of college athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2010;20:98-105.

    Not in our library10.1097/jsm.0b013e3181d44705

  29. 29.

    Rassi A, Rassi A, Rassi SG. Predictors of mortality in chronic Chagas disease: a systematic review of observational studies. Circulation. 2007;115:1101-8.

    Not in our library10.1161/circulationaha.106.627265

  30. 30.

    Lewis MD, Llewellyn MS, Yeo M, et al. Recent, independent and anthropogenic origins of Trypanosoma cruzi hybrids. Plos Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1363.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pntd.0001363

  31. 31.

    Zingales B, Andrade SG, Briones MR, et al. A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009;104:1051-4.

    Not in our library10.1590/s0074-02762009000700021

  32. 32.

    Marcili A, Lima L, Cavazzana M, et al. A new genotype of Trypanosoma cruzi associated with bats evidenced by phylogenetic analyses using SSU rDNA, cytochrome b and Histone H2B genes and genotyping based on ITS1 rDNA. Parasitology. 2009;136:641-55.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0031182009005861

  33. 33.

    Pinto CM, Kalko EK, Cottontail I, et al. TcBat a bat-exclusive lineage of Trypanosoma cruzi in the Panama Canal Zone, with comments on its classification and the use of the 18S rRNA gene for lineage identification. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:1328-32.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2012.04.013

  34. 34.

    Ramirez JD, Tapia-Calle G, Munoz-Cruz G, et al. Trypanosome species in neo-tropical bats: biological, evolutionary and epidemiological implications. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;22:250-6.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2013.06.022

  35. 35.

    Zingales B, Miles MA, Campbell DA, et al. The revised Trypanosoma cruzi subspecific nomenclature: rationale, epidemiological relevance and research applications. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12:240-53.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.meegid.2011.12.009

  36. 36.

    Miles MA, Toye PJ, Oswald SC, Godfrey DG. The identification by isoenzyme patterns of two distinct strain-groups of Trypanosoma cruzi, circulating independently in a rural area of Brazil. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1977;71:217-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/0035-9203(77)90012-8

  37. 37.

    Miles MA, Souza A, Povoa M, et al. Isozymic heterogeneity of Trypanosoma cruzi in the first autochthonous patients with Chagas’ disease in Amazonian Brazil. Nature. 1978;272:819-21.

    Not in our library10.1038/272819a0

  38. 38.

    Tibayrenc M, Ayala FJ. Isoenzyme variability in Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas’ disease. Genetical, taxonomical and epidemiological significance. Evolution. 1988;42:277-92.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04132.x

  39. 39.

    Tibayrenc M, Neubauer K, Barnabe C, et al. Genetic characterization of six parasitic protozoa: parity between random-primer DNA typing and multilocus enzyme electrophoresis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:1335-9.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.90.4.1335

  40. 40.

    Steindel M, Dias Neto E, de Menezes CL, et al. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi strains. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1993;60:71-9.

    Not in our library10.1016/0166-6851(93)90030-2

All 341 references

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.