The Weak Aspect of the Industrial Design Protection System in Indonesia
Cita Citrawinda Noerhadi
Indonesia Law Review · 2013
doi:10.15742/ilrev.v3n2.32 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Industrial property is is being used by an increasing number of developing countries as an important tool of technological and economic development. Developing countries have also been made aware that it is in their best interest to establish national industrial property systems. Indonesia as a signatory member of the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Indonesia has enacted Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design on 20 December 2000. Since the enactment of Law No. 31 of 2000 several cases have occurred and been brought before the Commercial Court involving the cancellation of lawsuits with regard to issues of the lack of ‘novelty’ of an industrial design which have already been granted to other people. There are several weak aspects of Law No. 31 of 2000 which in practice can create legal uncertainty and may potentially cause a barrier towards the effectiveness of the implementation of Law No. 31 of 2000.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References2
2 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.