The fundamentals of politics. A counterpoint Between Enrique Dussel and Ernesto Laclau
Edwin Cruz Rodríguez
Amauta · 2017
doi:10.15648/am.29.2017.7 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
<div style="text-align: justify;"><p>This paper compares the central elements in the political theories of Enrique Dussel and Ernesto Laclau. Laclau argues for a postfundacionalist thought that part of the poststructuralist critiques of essentialism to create his political theory. In contrast, Dussel proposes a perspective that although adopts the Marxist critique dogmatism, seeks to respond to the contemporary moment of liberation movements, which happens to think the fundamentals of the struggle for hegemony. In the first part the positions of both authors are contrasted in the debate on the fundamentals, particularly the Lalaus social political ontology and the Dussel´s metaphysics. In the second part some of the consequences that these positions entail in relation to the concepts of hegemony, the people and the “ought” of political struggles are identified.</p></div>
Abstract licence: CC BY-SA
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.