Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The synthesis of a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school computing

Peter Yiatrou, Irene Polycarpou, Janet Read and 1 more

Annals of computer science and information systems · 2016

doi:10.15439/2016f159 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

This study develops a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school Computer Science.In accordance with the pedagogy, prototype e-learning software was developed for use in student instruction and independent learning.The pedagogy was iteratively refined based on the evaluation of teachers and education experts and the resulting e-learning software was developed considering student feedback.The problem domain focuses on the UK's recent shift in educational emphasis towards Computer Science GCSEs; however, the findings are broadly transferable to other developed nations.The pedagogy synthesizes the following learning theories: Constructivism, Social Constructivism, Connectivism, Cognitive Load, ARCS and VARK learning styles, these were in turn distilled into 31 heuristics.The research is broken into three phases, the first two phases are discussed in this paper; Phase 1 is the Initial Pedagogical Strategy and Prototype, Phase 2 is the Elaboration via Action Research.The synthesis of a unified pedagogy for the design and evaluation of e-learning software for high-school computing

Abstract licence: CC BY

References22

    22 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.