Abiturientų kompiuterinio raštingumo analizė
Aidas Žandaris
Informacijos Mokslai · 2009
doi:10.15388/im.2009.0.3300 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
Straipsnyje analizuojami mokinių kompiuterinio raštingumo įskaitos (MKRĮ) 2007-ųjų ir 2009-ųjų metų rezultatai. Pateikiama statistinė informacija apie laikiusius šią įskaitą, atlikta rezultatų statistinė analizė. Remiantis šios analizės rezultatais – MKRĮ klausimų sunkumo koefi cientu ir skiriamąja geba – atrinkti klausimai, daugiausia problemų sukėlę laikiusiems įskaitą mokiniams. Iš šių klausimų ir mokinių rezultatų analizės matyti, kokias klaidas dažniausiai darė mokiniai, kurios temos jiems buvo sunkiausios. Apibendrinant atliktą analizę pateikiamos rekomendacijos IT mokytojams, dėstantiems IT kursą bendrojo lavinimo mokyklose. Analysis of School-leavers’ Computer Literacy Aidas Žandaris Summary The paper analyzes the results of School-leavers’ Computer Literacy Test (SCLT) in 2007 and 2009. Statistical data on those who took the course credit test are presented and the statistical analysis of the results is made. Based on the results of statistical analysis – the degree of diffi culty of SCLT items as well as item discrimination – the points that caused most problems for students who took the course credit test have been selected. The analysis of the test results of these issues has shown what mistakes were mostly made by the students and which topics were most difficult for them. Summarizing the analysis made, some recommendations are presented for teachers of Information Technology (IT) who deliver the IT course at schools of general education.
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.