The Mouse Universal Genotyping Array: From Substrains to Subspecies

Abstract

Genotyping microarrays are an important resource for genetic mapping, population genetics, and monitoring of the genetic integrity of laboratory stocks. We have developed the third generation of the Mouse Universal Genotyping Array (MUGA) series, GigaMUGA, a 143,259-probe Illumina Infinium II array for the house mouse (Mus musculus). The bulk of the content of GigaMUGA is optimized for genetic mapping in the Collaborative Cross and Diversity Outbred populations, and for substrain-level identification of laboratory mice. In addition to 141,090 single nucleotide polymorphism probes, GigaMUGA contains 2006 probes for copy number concentrated in structurally polymorphic regions of the mouse genome. The performance of the array is characterized in a set of 500 high-quality reference samples spanning laboratory inbred strains, recombinant inbred lines, outbred stocks, and wild-caught mice. GigaMUGA is highly informative across a wide range of genetically diverse samples, from laboratory substrains to other Mus species. In addition to describing the content and performance of the array, we provide detailed probe-level annotation and recommendations for quality control.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 53

1. 1.

   Aylor D. L. Valdar W. Foulds-Mathes W. Buus R. J. Verdugo R. A., 2011 Genetic analysis of complex traits in the emerging Collaborative Cross. Genome Res. 21: 1213–1222.

   Not in our library10.1101/gr.111310.110 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.
   PRDM9 Drives Evolutionary Erosion of Hotspots in Mus musculus through Haplotype-Specific Initiation of Meiotic Recombination · 2015

   No notice
3. 3.

   Beck J. A. Lloyd S. Hafezparast M. Lennon-Pierce M. Eppig J. T., 2000 Nat. Genet. 24: 23–25.

   Not in our library10.1038/71641 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Beltrame M. H. Boldt A. B. Catarino S. J. Mendes H. C. Boschmann S. E., 2015 MBL-associated serine proteases (MASPs) and infectious diseases. Mol. Immunol. 67: 85–100.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.molimm.2015.03.245 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.

   Bishop C. E. Boursot P. Baron B. Bonhomme F. Hatat D., 1985 Most classical Mus musculus domesticus laboratory mouse strains carry a Mus musculus Y chromosome. Nature 315: 70–72.

   Not in our library10.1038/315070a0 (opens in a new tab)

6. 6.

   Cahan P. Li Y. Izumi M. Graubert T. A., 2009 The impact of copy number variation on local gene expression in mouse hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Genet. 41: 430–437.

   Not in our library10.1038/ng.350 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Calaway J. D. Lenarcic A. B. Didion J. P. Wang J. R. Searle J. B., 2013 Genetic architecture of skewed X inactivation in the laboratory mouse. PLoS Genet. 9: e1003853.

   Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1003853 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.

   Carbonetto P. Cheng R. Gyekis J. P. Parker C. C. Blizard D. A., 2014 Discovery and refinement of muscle weight QTLs in B6 x D2 advanced intercross mice. Physiol. Genomics 46: 571–582.

   Not in our library10.1152/physiolgenomics.00055.2014 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Churchill G. A. Gatti D. M. Munger S. C. Svenson K. L., 2012 The diversity outbred mouse population. Mamm. Genome 23: 713–718.

   Not in our library10.1007/s00335-012-9414-2 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Clark A. G. Hubisz M. J. Bustamante C. D. Williamson S. H. Nielsen R., 2005 Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 15: 1496–1502.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.4107905 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Collaborative Cross Consortium, 2012 The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population. Genetics 190: 389–401.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.111.132639 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Crowley J. J. Zhabotynsky V. Sun W. Huang S. Pakatci I. K., 2015 Analyses of allele-specific gene expression in highly divergent mouse crosses identifies pervasive allelic imbalance. Nat. Genet. 47: 353–360.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.3222 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Cutler G. Marshall L. A. Chin N. Baribault H. Kassner P. D., 2007 Significant gene content variation characterizes the genomes of inbred mouse strains. Genome Res. 17: 1743–1754.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.6754607 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.

    Didion J. P. Yang H. Sheppard K. Fu C.-P. McMillan L., 2012 Discovery of novel variants in genotyping arrays improves genotype retention and reduces ascertainment bias. BMC Genomics 13: 34.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-13-34 (opens in a new tab)

15. 15.

    Didion J. P. Buus R. J. Naghashfar Z. Threadgill D. W. Morse H. C., 2014 SNP array profiling of mouse cell lines identifies their strains of origin and reveals cross-contamination and widespread aneuploidy. BMC Genomics 15: 847.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-15-847 (opens in a new tab)

16. 16.

    Didion J. P. Morgan A. P. Clayshulte A. M.-F. McMullan R. C. Yadgary L., 2015 A multi-megabase copy number gain causes maternal transmission ratio distortion on mouse chromosome 2. PLoS Genet. 11: e1004850.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pgen.1004850 (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    Egan C. M. Sridhar S. Wigler M. Hall I. M., 2007 Recurrent DNA copy number variation in the laboratory mouse. Nat. Genet. 39: 1384–1389.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.2007.19 (opens in a new tab)

18. 18.

    Fraley, C., A. E. Raftery, T. B. Murphy, and L. Scrucca, 2012 mclust Version 4 for R: normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Technical Report No. 597, Department of Statistics, University of Washington.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Frazer K. A. Eskin E. Kang H. M. Bogue M. A. Hinds D. A., 2007 A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains. Nature 448: 1050–1053.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06067 (opens in a new tab)

20. 20.

    Fu, C.-P., C. E. Welsh, F. P.-M. de Villena, and L. McMillan, 2012 Inferring ancestry in admixed populations using microarray probe intensities. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine - BCB ′12, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York.

    Not in our library

21. 21.
    Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping Methods for Diversity Outbred Mice · 2014

    No notice
22. 22.

    Henrichsen C. N. Vinckenbosch N. Zöllner S. Chaignat E. Pradervand S., 2009 Segmental copy number variation shapes tissue transcriptomes. Nat. Genet. 41: 424–429.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.345 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Kao, C.-Y., C.-P. Fu, and L. McMillan, 2014 InstantGenotype: A non-parametric model for genotype inference using microarray probe intensities. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics - BCB ′14, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), New York.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Keane T. M. Goodstadt L. Danecek P. White M. A. Wong K., et al, 2011 Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Nature 477: 289–294.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10413 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.

    Langmead B. Salzberg S. L., 2012 Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9: 357–359.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1923 (opens in a new tab)

26. 26.

    Li, H., 2013 Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997v1 [q-bio.GN].

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Li H. Durbin R., 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Li H. Handsaker B. Wysoker A. Fennell T. Ruan J., 2009 The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Lindblad-Toh K. Winchester E. Daly M. J. Wang D. G. Hirschhorn J. N., 2000 Large-scale discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 24: 381–386.

    Not in our library10.1038/74215 (opens in a new tab)

30. 30.

    Liu E. Y. Morgan A. P. Chesler E. J. Wang W. Churchill G. A., 2014 High-resolution sex-specific linkage maps of the mouse reveal polarized distribution of crossovers in male germline. Genetics 197: 91–106.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.114.161653 (opens in a new tab)

31. 31.

    McKenna A. Hanna M. Banks E. Sivachenko A. Cibulskis K., 2010 The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20: 1297–1303.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.107524.110 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Morgan, A. P., 2015 argyle: an R package for analysis of Illumina genotyping arrays. G3 (Bethesda) 6: 281–286.

    Not in our library10.1534/g3.115.023739 (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Morgan A. P. Welsh C. E., 2015 Informatics resources for the collaborative cross and related mouse populations. Mamm. Genome 26: 521–539.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00335-015-9581-z (opens in a new tab)

34. 34.

    Nonaka, M. and S. Miyazawa, 2001 Evolution of the initiating enzymes of the complement system. Genome Biol. 3: reviews1001.1.

    Not in our library10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews1001 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Peiffer D. A. Le J. M. Steemers F. J. Chang W. Jenniges T., 2006 High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res. 16: 1136–1148.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.5402306 (opens in a new tab)

36. 36.

    Quinlan A. R. Hall I. M., 2010 BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26: 841–842.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Quinlan A. R. Clark R. A. Sokolova S. Leibowitz M. L. Zhang Y., 2010 Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome. Genome Res. 20: 623–635.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.102970.109 (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Rogala A. R. Morgan A. P. Christensen A. M. Gooch T. J. Bell T. A., 2014 The Collaborative Cross as a resource for modeling human disease: CC011/Unc, a new mouse model for spontaneous colitis. Mamm. Genome 25: 95–108.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00335-013-9499-2 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell, 2006 Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Vol. 3, Ed. 3rd. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    She X. Cheng Z. Zöllner S. Church D. M. Eichler E. E., 2008 Mouse segmental duplication and copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 40: 909–914.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.172 (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 7

• Reduction of Stabilin-2 Contributes to a Protection Against Atherosclerosis · 2022
  Not checked
• Host-pathogen genetic interactions underlie tuberculosis susceptibility in genetically diverse mice · 2022
  No notice
• Systems genetics in diversity outbred mice inform BMD GWAS and identify determinants of bone strength · 2021
  Not checked
• Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling reveal different aspects of aging in the kidney · 2021
  No notice
• Heart disease in a mutant mouse model of spontaneous eosinophilic myocarditis maps to three loci · 2019
  Not checked
• R/qtl2: Software for Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci with High-Dimensional Data and Multiparent Populations · 2019
  No notice
• Genomes of the Mouse Collaborative Cross · 2017
  No notice

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.