Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Nov 4, 2026.

Species-Level Deconvolution of Metagenome Assemblies with Hi-C–Based Contact Probability Maps

Joshua N Burton, Ivan Liachko, Maitreya J Dunham and 1 more

G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · 2014

doi:10.1534/g3.114.011825

Abstract

Microbial communities consist of mixed populations of organisms, including unknown species in unknown abundances. These communities are often studied through metagenomic shotgun sequencing, but standard library construction methods remove long-range contiguity information; thus, shotgun sequencing and de novo assembly of a metagenome typically yield a collection of contigs that cannot readily be grouped by species. Methods for generating chromatin-level contact probability maps, e.g., as generated by the Hi-C method, provide a signal of contiguity that is completely intracellular and contains both intrachromosomal and interchromosomal information. Here, we demonstrate how this signal can be exploited to reconstruct the individual genomes of microbial species present within a mixed sample. We apply this approach to two synthetic metagenome samples, successfully clustering the genome content of fungal, bacterial, and archaeal species with more than 99% agreement with published reference genomes. We also show that the Hi-C signal can secondarily be used to create scaffolded genome assemblies of individual eukaryotic species present within the microbial community, with higher levels of contiguity than some of the species’ published reference genomes.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 39

  1. 1.

    Albertsen M. Hugenholtz P. Skarshewski A. Nielsen K. L. Tyson G. W., 2013 Genome sequences of rare, uncultured bacteria obtained by differential coverage binning of multiple metagenomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 533–538.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2579

  2. 2.

    Altschul S. F. Gish W. Miller W. Myers E. W. Lipman D. J., 1990 Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403–410.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2

  3. 3.

    Baker C. R. Tuch B. B. Johnson A. D., 2011 Extensive DNA-binding specificity divergence of a conserved transcription regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 7493–7498.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1019177108

  4. 4.

    Beitel C. W., Froenicke L., Lang J. M., Korf I. F., Michelmore R. W., et al., 2014. Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ PrePrints 2:e260v1. https://peerj.com/preprints/260v1/.

    Not in our library10.7717/peerj.415

  5. 5.

    Beitel C. W. Froenicke L. Lang J. M. Korf I. F. Michelmore R. W., 2014 Strain- and plasmid-level deconvolution of a synthetic metagenome by sequencing proximity ligation products. PeerJ 2: e415.

    Not in our library10.7717/peerj.415

  6. 6.

    Belloch C. Barrio E. Garcia M. D. Querol A., 1998 Inter- and intraspecific chromosome pattern variation in the yeast genus Kluyveromyces. Yeast 14: 1341–1354.

    Not in our library10.1002/(sici)1097-0061(199811)14:15<1341::aid-yea328>3.0.co;2-u

  7. 7.

    Burton J. N. Adey A. Patwardhan R. P. Qiu R. L. Kitzman J. O., 2013 Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 1119–1125.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2727

  8. 8.
  9. 9.

    David L. A. Maurice C. F. Carmody R. N. Gootenberg D. B. Button J. E., 2014 Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature 505: 559–563.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12820

  10. 10.

    Dekker J. Marti-Renom M. A. Mirny L. A., 2013 Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14: 390–403.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrg3454

  11. 11.
  12. 12.

    Eisen M. B. Spellman P. T. Brown P. O. Botstein D., 1998 Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 14863–14868.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863

  13. 13.

    Frias-Lopez J. Shi Y. Tyson G. W. Coleman M. L. Schuster S. C., 2008 Microbial community gene expression in ocean surface waters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 3805–3810.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0708897105

  14. 14.

    Howe A. C. Jansson J. K. Malfatti S. A. Tringe S. G. Tiedje J. M., 2014 Tackling soil diversity with the assembly of large, complex metagenomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 4904–4909.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1402564111

  15. 15.
  16. 16.

    Huttenhower C. D. Human Microbiome Project Consortium, et al., 2012 Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486: 207–214.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature11234

  17. 17.

    Iverson V. Morris R. M. Frazar C. D. Berthiaume C. T. Morales R. L., 2012 Untangling genomes from metagenomes: revealing an uncultured class of marine euryarchaeota. Science 335: 587–590.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1212665

  18. 18.

    Jarvis R. A. Patrick E. A., 1973 Clustering using a similarity measure based on shared near neighbors. IEEE Trans. Comput. C-22: 1025–1034.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Jeffries T. W. Grigoriev I. V. Grimwood J. Laplaza J. M. Aerts A., 2007 Genome sequence of the lignocellulose-bioconverting and xylose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis. Nat. Biotechnol. 25: 319–326.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1290

  20. 20.

    Kaplan N. Dekker J., 2013 High-throughput genome scaffolding from in vivo DNA interaction frequency. Nat. Biotechnol. 31: 1143–1147.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.2768

  21. 21.

    Le T. B. K. Imakaev M. V. Mirny L. A. Laub M. T., 2013 High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science 342: 731–734.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1242059

  22. 22.

    Li H. Durbin R., 2009 Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

  23. 23.

    Lieberman-Aiden E. van Berkum N. L. Williams L. Imakaev M. Ragoczy T., 2009 Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326: 289–293.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1181369

  24. 24.

    Mitra S. Forster-Fromme K. Damms-Machado A. Scheurenbrand T. Biskup S., 2013 Analysis of the intestinal microbiota using SOLiD 16S rRNA gene sequencing and SOLiD shotgun sequencing. BMC Genomics 14 (Suppl 5): S16.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2164-14-s5-s16

  25. 25.

    Moustafa A. Evans A. N. Kulis D. M. Hackett J. D. Erdner D. L., 2010 Transcriptome profiling of a toxic dinoflagellate reveals a gene-rich protist and a potential impact on gene expression due to bacterial presence. PLoS ONE 5: e9688.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0009688

  26. 26.

    Namiki T. Hachiya T. Tanaka H. Sakakibara Y., 2012 MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: e155.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gks678

  27. 27.

    Narasingarao P. Podell S. Ugalde J. A. Brochier-Armanet C. Emerson J. B., 2012 De novo metagenomic assembly reveals abundant novel major lineage of Archaea in hypersaline microbial communities. ISME J. 6: 81–93.

    Not in our library10.1038/ismej.2011.78

  28. 28.

    Peng Y. Leung H. C. M. Yiu S. M. Chin F. Y. L., 2012 IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28: 1420–1428.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts174

  29. 29.

    Qin J. J., R. Li, J. Raes, M. Arumugam, K. S. Burgdorf et al, 2010 A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 464: 59–65.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature08821

  30. 30.

    Renouf V. Claisse O. Lonvaud-Funel A., 2007 Inventory and monitoring of wine microbial consortia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75: 149–164.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00253-006-0798-3

  31. 31.

    Rinke C. Schwientek P. Sczyrba A. Ivanova N. N. Anderson I. J., 2013 Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499: 431–437.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12352

  32. 32.

    Saeed I. Tang S. L. Halgamuge S. K., 2012 Unsupervised discovery of microbial population structure within metagenomes using nucleotide base composition. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: e34.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkr1204

  33. 33.

    Sharon I. Morowitz M. J. Thomas B. C. Costello E. K. Relman D. A., 2013 Time series community genomics analysis reveals rapid shifts in bacterial species, strains, and phage during infant gut colonization. Genome Res. 23: 111–120.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.142315.112

  34. 34.

    Umbarger M. A. Toro E. Wright M. A. Porreca G. J. Bau D., 2011 The three-dimensional architecture of a bacterial genome and its alteration by genetic perturbation. Mol. Cell 44: 252–264.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.molcel.2011.09.010

  35. 35.

    van Berkum, N. L., Lieberman-Aiden E., Williams L., Imakaev M., Gnirke A., et al., 2010 Hi-C: a method to study the three-dimensional architecture of genomes. J Vis Exp. 39. pii: 1869.

    Not in our library10.3791/1869

  36. 36.

    Venter J. C. Remington K. Heidelberg J. F. Halpern A. L. Rusch D., 2004 Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304: 66–74.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1093857

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Xin G. Glawe D. Doty S. L., 2009 Characterization of three endophytic, indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts occurring in Populus trees. Mycol. Res. 113: 973–980.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.mycres.2009.06.001

  39. 39.

    Yaffe E. Tanay A., 2011 Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nat. Genet. 43: 1059–1065.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.947

Cited by papers we hold 9

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.