Comparison Between Linear and Non-parametric Regression Models for Genome-Enabled Prediction in Wheat

Abstract

In genome-enabled prediction, parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric regression models have been used. This study assessed the predictive ability of linear and non-linear models using dense molecular markers. The linear models were linear on marker effects and included the Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B. The non-linear models (this refers to non-linearity on markers) were reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression, Bayesian regularized neural networks (BRNN), and radial basis function neural networks (RBFNN). These statistical models were compared using 306 elite wheat lines from CIMMYT genotyped with 1717 diversity array technology (DArT) markers and two traits, days to heading (DTH) and grain yield (GY), measured in each of 12 environments. It was found that the three non-linear models had better overall prediction accuracy than the linear regression specification. Results showed a consistent superiority of RKHS and RBFNN over the Bayesian LASSO, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B models.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 46

1. 1.

   Bernardo R. Yu J. M., 2007 Prospects for genome-wide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47(3): 1082–1090

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Broomhead D. S. Lowe D., 1988 Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Systems 2: 321–355

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Burgueño J. Crossa J. Cornelius P. L. Trethowan R. McLaren G., 2007 Modeling additive × environment and additive × additive × environment using genetic covariances of relatives of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 47(1): 311–320

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Burgueño J. Crossa J. Cotes J. M. San Vicente F. Das B., 2011 Prediction assessment of linear mixed models for multienvironment trials. Crop Sci. 51(3): 944–954

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Chen S. Cowan C. F. N. Grant P. M., 1991 Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 2(2): 302–309

   Not in our library10.1109/72.80341

6. 6.

   Cockram J. Jones H. Leigh F. J. O’Sullivan D. Powell W., 2007 Control of flowering time in temperate cereals: genes, domestication, and sustainable productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 58(6): 1231–1244

   Not in our library10.1093/jxb/erm042

7. 7.

   Conti V. Roncallo P. F. Beaufort V. Cervigni G. L. Miranda R., 2011 Mapping of main and epistatic effect QTLs associated to grain protein and gluten strength using a RIL population of durum wheat. J. Appl. Genet. 52(3): 287–298

   Not in our library10.1007/s13353-011-0045-1

8. 8.

   Crossa J. Burgueño J. Cornelius P. L. McLaren G. Trethowan R., 2006 Modeling genotype × environment interaction using additive genetic covariances of relatives for predicting breeding values of wheat genotypes. Crop Sci. 46(4): 1722–1733

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Crossa J. de los Campos G. Perez P. Gianola D. Burgueño J., 2010 Prediction of genetic values of quantitative traits in plant breeding using pedigree and molecular markers. Genetics 186(2): 713–724

   Not in our library10.1534/genetics.110.118521

10. 10.

    Crossa J. Perez P. de los Campos G. Mahuku G. Dreisigacker S., 2011 Genomic selection and prediction in plant breeding. J. Crop Improv. 25(3): 239–261

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    de los Campos G. Perez P., 2010 BLR: Bayesian Linear Regression R package, version 1.2

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    de los Campos G. Naya H. Gianola D. Crossa J. Legarra A., 2009 Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics 182(1): 375–385

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.109.101501

13. 13.

    de los Campos G. Gianola D. Rosa G. J. M. Weigel K. A. Crossa J., 2010 Semi-parametric genomic-enabled prediction of genetic values using reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces methods. Genet. Res. 92(4): 295–308

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672310000285

14. 14.

    de los Campos G. Hickey J. M. Pong-Wong R. Daetwyler H. D. Calus M. P. L., 2012 Whole genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.14331.

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.112.143313

15. 15.

    Foresee D. Hagan M. T., 1997 Gauss-Newton approximation to Bayesian learning. International Conference on Neural Networks, June 9–12, Houston, TX

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Gianola D. van Kaam J. B. C. H. M., 2008 Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression methods for genomic assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics 178(4): 2289–2303

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.107.084285

17. 17.

    Gianola D. Fernando R. L. Stella A., 2006 Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics 173(3): 1761–1776

    Not in our library10.1534/genetics.105.049510

18. 18.
    Predicting complex quantitative traits with Bayesian neural networks: a case study with Jersey cows and wheat · 2011

    No notice
19. 19.

    Goldringer I. Brabant P. Gallais A., 1997 Estimation of additive and epistatic genetic variances for agronomic traits in a population of doubled-haploid lines of wheat. Heredity 79: 60–71

    Not in our library

20. 20.
    Genome-enabled prediction of genetic values using radial basis function neural networks · 2012

    No notice
21. 21.
    Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection · 2011

    No notice
22. 22.

    Hastie T. Tibshirani R. Friedman J., 2009 The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference and Prediction, Ed. 2 Springer, New York

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Heffner E. L. Sorrells M. E. Jannink J. L., 2009 Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49(1): 1–12

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Heslot N. Yang H. P. Sorrells M. E. Jannink J. L., 2012 Genomic selection in plant breeding: a comparison of models. Crop Sci. 52(1): 146–160

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Hickey J. M. Tier B., 2009 AlphaBayes (Beta): Software for Polygenic and Whole Genome Analysis. User Manual. University of New England, Armidale, Australia

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Hoerl A. E. Kennard R. W., 1970 Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1): 55–67

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Holland J. B., 2001 Epistasis and plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 21: 27–92

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Holland J. B., 2008 Theoretical and biological foundations of plant breeding, pp. 127–140 in Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer International Symposium, edited by K. R. Lamkey and M. Lee. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Lampinen J. Vehtari A., 2001 Bayesian approach for neural networks - review and case studies. Neural Netw. 14(3): 257–274

    Not in our library10.1016/s0893-6080(00)00098-8

30. 30.

    Laurie D. A. Pratchett N. Snape J. W. Bezant J. H., 1995 RFLP mapping of five major genes and eight quantitative trait loci controlling flowering time in a winter × spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross. Genome 38(3): 575–585

    Not in our library10.1139/g95-074

31. 31.

    Long N. Y. Gianola D. Rosa G. J. M. Weigel K. A. Kranis A., 2010 Radial basis function regression methods for predicting quantitative traits using SNP markers. Genet. Res. 92(3): 209–225

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672310000157

32. 32.

    MacKay D. J. C., 1992 A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Comput. 4(3): 448–472

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    MacKay D. J. C., 1994 Bayesian non-linear modelling for the prediction competition. ASHRAE Transactions 100(Pt. 2): 1053–1062

    Not in our library

34. 34.
    Beyond Missing Heritability: Prediction of Complex Traits · 2011

    No notice
35. 35.

    McKinney B. A. Pajewski N. M., 2012 Six degrees of epistasis: statistical network models for GWAS. Front. Genet. 2: 109

    Not in our library10.3389/fgene.2011.00109

36. 36.

    Meuwissen T. H. E. Hayes B. J. Goddard M. E., 2001 Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4): 1819–1829

    Not in our library10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819

37. 37.

    Neal R. M., 1996 Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks (Lecture Notes in Statistics), Vol. 118. Springer-Verlag, NY

    Not in our library

38. 38.
    Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data to Predict Quantitative Trait Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster · 2012

    No notice
39. 39.

    Okut H. Gianola D. Rosa G. J. Weigel K. A., 2011 Prediction of body mass index in mice using dense molecular markers and a regularized neural network. Genet. Res. Camb. 93: 189–201

    Not in our library10.1017/s0016672310000662

40. 40.

    Park T. Casella G., 2008 The Bayesian LASSO. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 103: 681–686

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 11

• A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection · 2021
  No notice
• LightGBM: accelerated genomically designed crop breeding through ensemble learning · 2021
  No notice
• A Guide on Deep Learning for Complex Trait Genomic Prediction · 2019
  No notice
• Prospects and Challenges of Applied Genomic Selection—A New Paradigm in Breeding for Grain Yield in Bread Wheat · 2018
  Not checked
• Accounting for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Residual Genetic Variation in Genomic Selection for Water-Soluble Carbohydrate Concentration in Wheat · 2018
  Not checked
• Genomic Prediction of Gene Bank Wheat Landraces · 2016
  No notice
• Genome-wide prediction models that incorporate de novo GWAS are a powerful new tool for tropical rice improvement · 2016
  No notice
• Genomic Selection and Association Mapping in Rice (Oryza sativa): Effect of Trait Genetic Architecture, Training Population Composition, Marker Number and Statistical Model on Accuracy of Rice Genomic Selection in Elite, Tropical Rice Breeding Lines · 2015
  Corrected
• Increased Prediction Accuracy in Wheat Breeding Trials Using a Marker × Environment Interaction Genomic Selection Model · 2015
  No notice
• Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review · 2014
  No notice
• Genomic Prediction in Maize Breeding Populations with Genotyping-by-Sequencing · 2013
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.