Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

An Alzheimer‐associated TREM2 variant occurs at the ADAM cleavage site and affects shedding and phagocytic function

Kai Schlepckow, Gernot Kleinberger, Akio Fukumori and 4 more

EMBO Molecular Medicine · 2017

doi:10.15252/emmm.201707672

Abstract

Sequence variations occurring in the gene encoding the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) support an essential function of microglia and innate immunity in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders. TREM2 matures within the secretory pathway, and its ectodomain is shed on the plasma membrane. Missense mutations in the immunoglobulin (Ig)‐like domain such as p.T66M and p.Y38C retain TREM2 within the endoplasmic reticulum and reduce shedding as well as TREM2‐dependent phagocytosis. Using mass spectrometry, we have now determined the cleavage site of TREM2. TREM2 is shed by proteases of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain containing protein) family C‐terminal to histidine 157, a position where an AD‐associated coding variant has been discovered (p.H157Y) in the Han Chinese population. Opposite to the characterized mutations within the Ig‐like domain, such as p.T66M and p.Y38C, the p.H157Y variant within the stalk region leads to enhanced shedding of TREM2. Elevated ectodomain shedding reduces cell surface full‐length TREM2 and lowers TREM2‐dependent phagocytosis. Therefore, two seemingly opposite cellular effects of TREM2 variants, namely reduced versus enhanced shedding, result in similar phenotypic outcomes by reducing cell surface TREM2.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 18, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Inflammation and activation of brain‐resident immune cells are common hallmarks of numerous neurological disorders. A pivotal role of microgliosis has been recognized since a long time specifically in neurodegenerative disorders (Lyman et al, 2014; Villegas‐Llerena et al, 2016). A central role of microglial function in disease pathogenesis is now further supported by the identification of sequence variants and mutations in the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) that are associated with an increased risk for several neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), Parkinson's disease, and FTLD‐like syndrome (Guerreiro & Hardy, 2013; Guerreiro et al, 2013; Jonsson & Stefansson, 2013; Rayaprolu et al, 2013; Borroni et al, 2014; Cady et al, 2014; Cuyvers et al, 2014) and in a homozygous state cause Nasu–Hakola disease (Klunemann et al, 2005). In the brain, TREM2 is preferentially expressed in microglia and is functionally required for migration, cytokine release, phagocytosis, lipid sensing, ApoE binding, shielding of amyloid plaques, and microglia proliferation (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Atagi et al, 2015; Bailey et al, 2015; Colonna & Wang, 2016; Ulrich & Holtzman, 2016; Yeh et al, 2016; Yuan et al, 2016). TREM2 is a type‐1 transmembrane protein that shuttles to the plasma membrane where it exerts its cell autonomous biological functions. TREM2 undergoes regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP) (Lichtenthaler et al, 2011; Wunderlich et al, 2013) (Fig 1A), which is initiated on the cell surface via shedding of full‐length TREM2 by ADAM10 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain containing protein) (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Shedding by ADAM10 results in the liberation of soluble TREM2 (sTREM2), which can be detected in human cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Heslegrave et al, 2016; Piccio et al, 2016; Suarez‐Calvet et al, 2016a,b). The membrane‐retained C‐terminal fragment (CTF) is subsequently cleared via an intramembranous cleavage by γ‐secretase (Fig 1A) (Wunderlich et al, 2013; Glebov et al, 2016). So far several mutations have been functionally investigated. Mutations within the immunoglobulin (Ig)‐like domain such as p.T66M and p.Y38C apparently result in misfolding of TREM2 and retention of the immature protein within the endoplasmic reticulum (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Park et al, 2015; Song et al, 2017) although upon strong transient overexpression mutant proteins may escape retention (Kober et al, 2016). As a consequence of misfolding, reduced cell surface levels of TREM2 are observed and shedding is dramatically lowered leading to reduced sTREM2 and TREM2 CTF levels (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Consistent with that, a patient with a homozygous TREM2 p.T66M mutation had extremely low or even no detectable sTREM2 in the CSF (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Piccio et al, 2016). Lowered cell surface TREM2 results in reduced phagocytic activity (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Although initially discrepant results regarding the effects of a loss of TREM2 function on amyloid plaque pathology were reported (Jay et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2015), TREM2 loss of function may lead to the accumulation of fuzzy amyloid plaques suggesting a lack of phagocytic clearance of the plaque halo or reduced prevention of amyloid plaque growth (Wang et al, 2016; Yuan et al, 2016). In support of reduced phagocytic plaque degradation, we showed recently that immunotherapeutic clearance of amyloid plaques via phagocytosis is reduced in the absence of TREM2 (Xiang et al, 2016).

Most of the functionally investigated mutations are located within the Ig‐like domain of TREM2. Misfolding of this domain, retention, and consequently reduced shedding appear to be a common readout of at least some of these variants. Although many sequence variants were found within the Ig‐like domain, genetic studies also identified sequence variants within the stalk region and such mutants are unlikely to affect folding of the Ig‐like domain. Since mutations in the stalk region may affect the efficacy and precision of ADAM‐mediated shedding, we first determined the TREM2 cleavage site. Strikingly, ADAM‐mediated cleavage within the stalk region occurs C‐terminal to histidine 157 exactly where the AD‐associated variant p.H157Y is located (Guerreiro et al, 2013; Ma et al, 2014; Jiang et al, 2016; Song et al, 2017). Analysis of proteolytic processing of the mutant variant revealed that higher levels of sTREM2 are generated, a finding opposite to the reduced shedding observed for mutations within the Ig‐like domain such as p.T66M and p.Y38C (Kleinberger et al, 2014). However, enhanced shedding of TREM2 p.H157Y leads to reduced cell surface full‐length TREM2 and hence to reduced phagocytic activity. Thus, mutations located within the Ig‐like domain or the stalk region reduce surface expression of TREM2 and probably its signaling activity via completely different cellular mechanisms.

TREM2 is cleaved by ADAM proteases between histidine 157 and serine 158

To determine the cleavage site of TREM2, we followed two independent approaches. First, we determined the N‐terminus of the membrane retained CTF remaining after shedding of the full‐length precursor (Kleinberger et al, 2014). To do so, we expressed C‐terminally Flag‐tagged TREM2 (TREM2‐CFlag) in human kidney 293 cells (HEK 293) (strategy I; Fig 1B). We enriched for the ADAM generated TREM2 CTF by inhibiting its γ‐secretase‐mediated intramembrane cleavage with DAPT (Dovey et al, 2001). Consistent with previous results (Wunderlich et al, 2013), Western blot analysis revealed a massive accumulation of the CTF upon γ‐secretase inhibition (Fig 1C). Immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry of the DAPT enriched CTF revealed one major peak corresponding to a molecular mass of 8,841.48 Da (Fig 1D; Table 1). This corresponds to a CTF with an N‐terminus at serine 158 (see also Fig 1J). Additional very minor peaks may be due to proteolytic degradation of the CTF most likely within lysosomes. This is supported by the almost complete absence of such minor peaks in the analysis of the cleavage site of sTREM2 (see below).

So far ADAM10 has been described as the sole sheddase of TREM2 (Kleinberger et al, 2014). However, shedding is well known to be stimulated after protein kinase C activation. Under these conditions, shedding is predominantly performed by ADAM17 (Black, 2002; Saftig & Lichtenthaler, 2015). To prove whether TREM2 shedding can be stimulated similarly and whether cleavage still occurs at the same site, we treated HEK293 cells stably expressing TREM2‐CFlag with phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (PMA). This resulted in a robust increase in TREM2 shedding (Fig 1E). Similarly, and in line with previous results (Nitsch et al, 1992), shedding of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) was also stimulated (Fig 1E; lower panel). To determine the cleavage site of TREM2 after PMA‐stimulated shedding, we again enriched for the CTF by γ‐secretase inhibition (Fig 1C) followed by immunoprecipitation with an anti‐Flag antibody. Mass spectrometry of the CTF revealed one major peak corresponding to a molecular mass of 8,837.09 Da (Fig 1F; Table 1). Thus, after PMA‐stimulated TREM2 shedding, the proteolytic cleavage also occurs between histidine 157 and serine 158 (see also Fig 1J).

To independently confirm the cleavage site, we introduced a TEV‐protease cleavage site within the ectodomain of TREM2 after amino acid 132 followed by a Flag‐tag (TREM2‐TEVFlag; strategy II; Fig 1G) according to our previously described strategy for the identification of the cleavage site of presenilins (Fukumori et al, 2010). We first proved that such a modified TREM2 variant matures and undergoes shedding like unmodified TREM2. In cell lysates, full‐length TREM2‐TEVFlag was readily detected (Fig 1H; middle panel). HEK 293 cells expressing TREM2‐TEVFlag also showed robust shedding of TREM2‐TEVFlag (Fig 1H; upper panel), which is in line with the detection of the CTF in cell lysates (Fig 1H; middle panel). Next, sTREM2 was isolated by immunoprecipitation with an anti‐Flag antibody and subsequently digested with TEV protease. Upon enrichment of the cleaved C‐terminal peptide by anti‐Flag immunoprecipitation (see Fig 1G), mass spectrometric analysis revealed a single sharp peak corresponding to a molecular mass of 3,947.78 Da, which was absent in conditioned media from HEK293 cells transfected with an empty expression vector (Fig 1I; Table 1). The observed molecular mass corresponds to a peptide terminating within the stalk region after histidine 157 (see also Fig 1J). Thus, both strategies independently identified one major cleavage site between histidine 157 and serine 158 (Fig 1J).

Next, we investigated whether shedding also occurs in a human monocytic cell line at the same site. To do so, we transiently transfected TREM2‐TEVFlag into THP‐1 cells (Tsuchiya et al, 1980). TREM2‐TEVFlag matures in THP‐1 cells as in HEK293 cells and shedding of sTREM2 occurs as expected (Fig 1K). Following the same strategy as for HEK293 cells (see Fig 1G), mass spectrometric analysis revealed a single sharp peak corresponding to a molecular mass of 3,943.80 Da (Fig 1L; Table 1), which was absent in conditioned media from THP‐1 cells transfected with an empty expression vector (Fig 1L; Table 1). The observed molecular mass corresponds to a peptide terminating within the stalk region after histidine 157 (see also Fig 1J), indicating the same TREM2 cleavage site in a human monocytic cell line.

A disease‐associated mutation at the cleavage site increases shedding

The cleavage site of TREM2 after histidine 157 coincides with the p.H157Y late‐onset AD‐associated mutation recently described in the Han Chinese population (Ma et al, 2014; Jiang et al, 2016) (Fig 2A). Since it is well known that an AD‐related mutation at the site of β‐secretase‐mediated shedding of APP pathologically affects APP proteolysis (Citron et al, 1992; Cai et al, 1993; Haass et al, 1995b; Thinakaran et al, 1996), we investigated proteolytic processing of TREM2 p.H157Y. Surprisingly, and opposite to the p.T66M and p.Y38C mutations, we found enhanced shedding of the p.H157Y mutant by Western blotting (Fig 2B). This was independently confirmed by anti‐HA ELISA‐mediated quantitation (Fig 2C). Since shedding of p.H157Y is significantly increased and the amino acid sequence is changed at the P1 site, we next asked whether the cleavage still occurs after amino acid 157. As described above, we enriched for the CTF produced from TREM2 p.H157Y via inhibition of γ‐secretase by DAPT (see also Fig 2H). Mass spectrometry of the enriched CTF revealed one major peak corresponding to a molecular mass of 8,832.76 Da, which is consistent with a predominant cleavage after amino acid 157 (Fig 2D and E; Table 1). Thus, TREM2 p.H157Y is cleaved at the very same position as wild‐type (wt) TREM2. Furthermore, TREM2 p.H157Y is also shed by members of the ADAM family, since the protease inhibitors GM6001 and GI254023X significantly reduce shedding (Fig 2F). Enhanced shedding of the p.H157Y variant is accompanied by reduced levels of mature fully glycosylated TREM2 (Fig 2G). Despite increased shedding and reduced mature TREM2, we surprisingly observed less CTFs suggesting enhanced degradation (Fig 2G). In line with that, the CTF derived from TREM2 p.H157Y is recovered after inhibition of γ‐secretase cleavage (Fig 2H). Furthermore, additional expression of DAP12, which forms a tight complex with TREM2 (Paradowska‐Gorycka & Jurkowska, 2013), prevents γ‐secretase‐dependent degradation of the p.H157Y TREM2 CTF (Fig. 2I). Enhanced shedding suggests reduced levels of TREM2 on the plasma membrane. Levels of cell surface mutant and wt TREM2 were determined by cell surface biotinylation. In line with our previous findings (Kleinberger et al, 2014), wt TREM2 was readily observed on the plasma membrane (Fig 2J). In contrast, p.H157Y could not be biotinylated on the cell surface similar to the previously investigated p.T66M mutant (Kleinberger et al, 2014) (Fig 2I). Thus, the histidine‐to‐tyrosine exchange at amino acid 157 increases shedding of mutant TREM2 and, as a consequence, reduces cell surface levels of the fully mature protein.

The disease‐associated mutation reduces phagocytic activity

Both the p.T66M and the p.H157Y mutations lead to reduced cell surface TREM2, albeit via opposite cellular mechanisms. Since the amount of cell surface TREM2 correlates with its cell autonomous function (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Song et al, 2017), we hypothesized that both mutations may result in a similar loss of function. To investigate TREM2‐mediated function, we analyzed TREM2‐dependent phagocytosis. In line with our previous findings (Kleinberger et al, 2014), wt TREM2 readily promoted uptake of Escherichia coli conjugated to pHrodo (Fig 3). Uptake was specific since treatment with cytochalasin D blocked engulfment of E. coli. Strikingly, cells expressing TREM2 p.H157Y exhibited a significantly reduced phagocytic capacity (Fig 3), demonstrating that this mutation at least affects phagocytic uptake of bacteria.

Sequence variations of TREM2 have been found in all domains of the protein. However, most of the mutations occur within the Ig‐like domain. At least some of the mutant proteins, such as p.T66M and p.Y38C, are likely to be misfolded and retained within the endoplasmic reticulum (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Park et al, 2015; Song et al, 2017). Therefore, these types of mutations reduce cell surface TREM2 and consequently the release of sTREM2, as shedding predominantly occurs on the plasma membrane. Consistent with reduced cell surface TREM2, biological functions of TREM2 such as lipid sensing, ApoE binding, and phagocytosis are all decreased by such mutations (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Atagi et al, 2015; Bailey et al, 2015; Yeh et al, 2016). Thus, for this class of mutations reduced release of sTREM2 may serve as a surrogate marker for reduced biological function. In line with that, a patient with a homozygous p.T66M mutation showed almost no sTREM2 in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Piccio et al, 2016), and this mutation is known to severely affect TREM2 functions (Kleinberger et al, 2014; Yeh et al, 2016). A number of sequence variants are now reported to occur within the stalk region of TREM2, which may not be involved in ligand binding and may also not be as sensitive to subtle structural changes as the highly folded Ig‐like domain (Paradowska‐Gorycka & Jurkowska, 2013). This region apparently serves as a spacer for the functionally important Ig‐like domain but also contains the cleavage site recognized by the TREM2 sheddase that we have identified between histidine 157 and serine 158. Strikingly, a mutation, which increases the risk for late‐onset AD, occurs in the Han Chinese population at P1 of the cleavage site (p.H157Y) (Ma et al, 2014; Jiang et al, 2016). In contrast to the above‐described mutation, the p.H157Y mutation does not decrease but rather enhances shedding. On the first view, this may be a rather paradoxical finding. However, we also observed much less mature TREM2 p.H157Y, and consequently, the mutant protein could not be surface biotinylated similar to the TREM2 p.T66M mutation. Thus, enhanced shedding reduces the amount of full‐length membrane‐bound TREM2 on the cell surface. Apparently, the p.H157Y mutation provides a better substrate for shedding. As a consequence, shedding may already take place during transport of mutant TREM2 to the plasma membrane. This would be very similar to the Swedish APP mutation, which provides a better substrate for β‐secretase‐mediated processing and is therefore cleaved much earlier during cell surface transport than its wild‐type counterpart (Haass et al, 1995b; Thinakaran et al, 1996). Moreover, ADAMs do not only cleave at the cell surface, but can also process their substrates (e.g. APP) already within the trans‐Golgi (Haass et al, 1995a). For TREM2‐mediated signaling, cell surface TREM2 bound to its co‐receptor DAP12 is an absolute prerequisite (Colonna & Wang, 2016); thus, reduced cell surface TREM2 should result in reduced biological activity. This is indeed what we observed for the p.H157Y mutation. Similar to the p.T66M mutation (Kleinberger et al, 2014), this mutation interferes with phagocytosis and probably with all other surface TREM2‐related functions as well. In line with that Song et al (2017) report, reduced ligand binding of p.H157Y and reduced phagocytic function may directly affect AD pathology. In that regard, it has been shown recently that in the absence of TREM2 fuzzy amyloid plaques accumulate, which may be a consequence of reduced engulfment of amyloid β‐peptide by the dysfunctional microglia (Wang et al, 2016). Whether this is due to a direct inhibition of phagocytic activity and/or reduced migration to amyloid plaques remains to be shown. Moreover, similar to our recent analysis of mice endogenously expressing p.T66M (Kleinberger et al, 2017), the p.H157Y mutation should also be functionally investigated under an in vivo setting to confirm mutant TREM2 function in microglia in their natural environment.

Taken together, by locating a late‐onset AD‐associated TREM2 mutation right at P1 of the ADAM cleavage site, we demonstrate a novel cellular mechanism, which via enhanced shedding may lead to reduced function. Furthermore, our findings may open the opportunity to therapeutically modulate TREM2 function by selectively blocking access of ADAM proteases to the cleavage site between histidine 157 and serine 158.

cDNA constructs

cDNA constructs that were used in this study have been previously described (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Briefly, TREM2‐CFlag as denoted in the main text is full‐length TREM2 with N‐ and C‐terminal HA and Flag tags, respectively. TREM2‐DAP12 fusion constructs contained the ectodomain of TREM2 including aa169 (Proline169) fused to DAP12 (aa28–113). Furthermore, an amino acid change in the transmembrane domain of DAP12 from aspartic acid to alanine (p.D50A) was included (Hamerman et al, 2006). Additionally, the TREM2‐DAP12 fusion constructs included a HA‐tag and a linker sequence (SGGGGGLE) after the endogenous TREM2 signal peptide. The TREM2 missense mutation p.H157Y (CAC>TAC) was introduced into the respective plasmid by site‐directed mutagenesis (Stratagene). The TREM2‐TEVFlag construct was generated according to a previously reported strategy (Fukumori et al, 2010). The TEVFlag sequence (ENLYFQGDYKDDDDK) was introduced after amino acid 132. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing (GATC Biotech).

Cell culture

Generation and maintenance of stable HEK293 Flp‐In cells lines were performed as previously described (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Human monocytic THP‐1 cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS (Sigma), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 50 μM β‐mercaptoethanol. THP‐1 cells were kept in culture at densities between 2 × 105 and 1 × 106 cells per ml of cell culture medium, and transfections were performed at densities between 5 × 105 and 1 × 106 cells per ml of cell culture medium. Transfections were carried out with 1 μg of TREM2‐TEVFlag DNA per 1 × 106 of THP‐1 cells using a nucleofector device and the SG Cell Line 4D‐Nucleofector® X Kit (both Lonza). GFP cDNA was transfected in parallel to check for transfection efficiency. Transient transfection of cells stably expressing wt or mutant TREM2 with human DAP12 was performed in a 6‐well plate using 2 μg DNA/well and Lipofectamine 2000. If not stated otherwise, cell culture reagents were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific.

Antibodies

For immunoblot detection, the following antibodies were used: rat monoclonal anti‐HA conjugated to HRP (3F10; 1:700 to 1:2,000; Roche), goat polyclonal anti‐human TREM2 (AF1828; 1:100; R&D Systems), rat monoclonal antibody against a C‐terminal peptide of human TREM2 (9D11; 1:20; C‐HGQKPGTHPPSELDCGHDPG), rat monoclonal antibody against sAPPα (2D8 (Shirotani et al, 2007); 1:100), and rabbit anti‐calnexin (1:3,000, Enzo Life Sciences). The HRP‐conjugated goat anti‐rat (1:10,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), donkey anti‐goat (1:10,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and goat anti‐rabbit IgG (1:10,000; Promega) were used as secondary antibodies.

Cell surface biotinylation

Surface biotinylations were carried out as described previously (Kleinberger et al, 2014).

Preparation of conditioned media, cell lysates, and immunoblotting

HEK293 Flp‐In cells stably expressing respective cDNA constructs were seeded at a density of 1.5 × 106/cm2, and medium was changed 48 h post‐seeding. Inhibitors/activators used were GM 6001 (25 μM), GI 254023X (5 μM), DAPT (5 μM, all Sigma), and phorbol 12‐myristate 13‐acetate (PMA; 100 nM; Enzo Life Sciences). Conditioned medium was collected after 18–20 h except for PMA‐treated cells where media were collected after 2 h. Membrane fractions were prepared as previously described (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Alternatively, total lysates were prepared using STE lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X‐100). Lysis was carried out on ice for 20 min, and lysates were obtained upon centrifugation at 15,871 g for 30 min at 4°C. To generate lysates upon transient transfection of THP‐1 monocytes, cells were gently centrifuged (100 g for 10 min at 4°C) after overnight incubation at 37°C, washed once with ice‐cold phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), centrifuged again (100 g for 10 min at 4°C), and subsequently lysed. Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA method, equal amounts of protein were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer supplemented with β‐mercaptoethanol, separated by standard 15% SDS–PAGE, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond P; Amersham Biosciences), processed with respective antibodies, and developed using enhanced chemiluminescence technique (Pierce).

Phagocytosis assay

Phagocytosis of fluorogenic E. coli particles (pHrodo Green, Molecular Probes) after 60‐ or 120‐min incubation at 37°C was performed as described before (Kleinberger et al, 2014). As a negative control, phagocytosis was inhibited with cytochalasin D (10 μM; Sigma).

sTREM2 ELISA

sTREM2 levels from conditioned media were essentially determined as previously described (Kleinberger et al, 2014). Rat anti‐HA antibody (3F10; 1:1,000; Roche) was used as detection antibody.

MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry analysis of ectodomain cleavage

For the identification of the N‐terminus of the TREM2 CTF, HEK293 Flp‐In cells stably expressing TREM2‐CFlag (both wt and p.H157Y) were harvested in ice‐cold PBS upon overnight treatment using DAPT. Upon treatment with PMA, cells were harvested 5 h post‐treatment. Cell pellets were frozen at −20°C until use. Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (4% n‐dodecyl β‐D‐maltoside, 0.1% N‐octylglucoside, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, and 140 mM NaCl) containing protease inhibitor mix (Sigma) for 20 min on ice. Following a clarifying spin at 21,000 g for 10 min, supernatants were subjected to a second clarifying spin by ultracentrifugation at 100,000 g for 1 h and incubated with anti‐FLAG M2‐agarose (Sigma) overnight by rotation at 4°C. Beads were washed four times with immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry (IP/MS) buffer (0.1% N‐octylglucoside, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, and 140 mM NaCl) and two times with water. Beads were stored at −20°C until MS analysis. Control samples were generated using HEK293 Flp‐In cells stably transfected with an empty expression vector (pcDNA5/FRT/TO, Thermo Fisher Scientific).

For the identification of the C‐terminus of the shed ectodomain, the TREM2‐TEVFlag cDNA construct was transfected transiently into HEK293 Flp‐In cells followed by addition of fresh medium 24 h post‐transfection. After further 5 h, the supernatant was collected and cleared by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4°C. The pH of the supernatant was adjusted to pH 8.0 using 1 M Tris/HCl (30 mM final concentration). 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0 (3.5 mM final concentration) was added, and the supernatant was incubated with 40 μl anti‐FLAG M2‐agarose overnight by rotation at 4°C. Beads were washed four times with IP/MS buffer and two times with water. The TREM2 ectodomain was eluted from the beads with 40 μl 100 mM glycine pH 2.5 for 10 min by rotation at 4°C. Upon centrifugation (5 min at 1,200 g), the supernatant was neutralized by addition of 1/8 volume 1 M Tris–HCl pH 8.0. After addition of EDTA, DTT (final concentrations of 5 mM and 1 mM, respectively), and complete protease inhibitor (Roche), 10 units of AcTEV protease (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added and digestion was carried out overnight at 4°C. Upon addition of 1 ml of IP/MS buffer, 10 μl anti‐FLAG M2‐agarose was added and immunoprecipitation was conducted for 1 h by rotation at 4°C. Beads were washed three times with IP/MS buffer and three times with water and stored at −20°C until MS analysis. In case of THP‐1 monocytes, 30 × 106 cells were transiently transfected with the TREM2‐TEVFlag cDNA construct. Upon overnight incubation at 37°C, cells were spun down and media were processed as described above to give samples for mass spectrometry. Control samples were generated using either HEK293 Flp‐In cells or THP‐1 cells transiently transfected with an empty expression vector (EV; pcDNA5/FRT/TO).

MS analysis was performed using a 4800 MALDI TOF/TOF analyzer (Applied Biosystems) essentially as described previously (Fukumori et al, 2010). Immunoprecipitated peptides were eluted from the beads using 0.3% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in 50% acetonitrile and saturated with α‐cyano‐4‐hydroxy cinnamic acid. The dissolved samples were dried on a stainless plate and subjected to MALDI‐TOF MS analysis.

Statistics

The data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and in SPSS IBM, version 20.0. Group comparisons in the levels of sTREM2 (Fig 2C) or in phagocytosis assays (Fig 3) were analyzed by one‐way ANOVA test followed by Dunnett's or Tukey's post hoc tests for pairwise comparisons, respectively. All tests were 2‐tailed, and statistical significance was set to P < 0.05.

Author contributions

CH, KS, and GK designed the study and interpreted the results with additional help from HS and SFL. KS performed most experiments. Mass spectrometry was carried out by AF and KS. RF generated monoclonal antibodies. CH wrote the manuscript with input of all co‐authors.

Conflict of interest

C.H. is an advisor of F. Hoffmann‐La Roche. C.H., G.K, and K.S. filed a patent (EP16180844) for the use of TREM2 cleavage modulators.

Problem

A central role of microglial function in disease pathogenesis is strongly supported by the identification of sequence variants in the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) that are associated with an increased risk for several neurodegenerative disorders. Most of the functionally investigated mutations are located within the Ig‐like domain of TREM2. Misfolding of this domain, retention, and consequently reduced shedding appear to be a common read‐out of at least some of these variants. Although many sequence variants were found within the Ig‐like domain, genetic studies also identified sequence variants within the stalk region and such mutants are unlikely to affect folding of the Ig‐like domain. Since mutations in the stalk region may rather affect the efficacy and precision of ADAM‐mediated shedding, we determined the TREM2 cleavage site. Moreover, modulation of TREM2 shedding, for example, by its selective inhibition, may be an innovative therapeutic approach, for which knowledge of the exact cleavage site is absolutely required.

Results

TREM2 is shed by proteases of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain containing protein) family C‐terminal to histidine 157, a position where an AD‐associated coding variant has been discovered (p.H157Y) in the Han Chinese population. Opposite to the characterized mutations within the Ig‐like domain, such as p.T66M and p.Y38C, the p.H157Y variant within the stalk region leads to enhanced shedding of TREM2. Elevated ectodomain shedding reduces cell surface full‐length TREM2 and lowers TREM2‐dependent phagocytosis.

Impact

Two seemingly opposite cellular effects of TREM2 variants, namely reduced versus enhanced shedding, result in similar phenotypic outcomes by reducing cell surface TREM2. Moreover, these findings may open the opportunity to therapeutically modulate TREM2 function by selectively blocking access of ADAM proteases to the cleavage site between histidine 157 and serine 158. In contrast to blocking ADAM 10/17 activity with conventional protease inhibitors, this approach would be selective and avoid cleavage inhibition of numerous ADAM10/17 substrates.

References 49

  1. 1.

    Atagi Y, Liu CC, Painter MM, Chen XF, Verbeeck C, Zheng H, Li X, Rademakers R, Kang SS, Xu H et al (2015 ) Apolipoprotein E is a ligand for triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2). J Biol Chem 290: 26043–26050

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.679043

  2. 2.

    Bailey CC, DeVaux LB, Farzan M (2015 ) The triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 binds apolipoprotein E. J Biol Chem 290: 26033–26042

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m115.677286

  3. 3.

    Black RA (2002 ) Tumor necrosis factor‐alpha converting enzyme. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 34: 1–5

    Not in our library10.1016/s1357-2725(01)00097-8

  4. 4.

    Borroni B, Ferrari F, Galimberti D, Nacmias B, Barone C, Bagnoli S, Fenoglio C, Piaceri I, Archetti S, Bonvicini C et al (2014 ) Heterozygous TREM2 mutations in frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Aging 35: 934 e937–910

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.017

  5. 5.

    Cady J, Koval ED, Benitez BA, Zaidman C, Jockel‐Balsarotti J, Allred P, Baloh RH, Ravits J, Simpson E, Appel SH et al (2014 ) TREM2 variant p. R47H as a risk factor for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 71: 449–453

    Not in our library10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.6237

  6. 6.

    Cai XD, Golde TE, Younkin SG (1993 ) Release of excess amyloid beta protein from a mutant amyloid beta protein precursor. Science 259: 514–516

    Not in our library10.1126/science.8424174

  7. 7.

    Citron M, Oltersdorf T, Haass C, McConlogue L, Hung AY, Seubert P, Vigo‐Pelfrey C, Lieberburg I, Selkoe DJ (1992 ) Mutation of the beta‐amyloid precursor protein in familial Alzheimer's disease increases beta‐protein production. Nature 360: 672–674

    Not in our library10.1038/360672a0

  8. 8.

    Colonna M, Wang Y (2016 ) TREM2 variants: new keys to decipher Alzheimer disease pathogenesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 17: 201–207

    Not in our library10.1038/nrn.2016.7

  9. 9.

    Cuyvers E, Bettens K, Philtjens S, Van Langenhove T, Gijselinck I, van der Zee J, Engelborghs S, Vandenbulcke M, Van Dongen J, Geerts N et al (2014 ) Investigating the role of rare heterozygous TREM2 variants in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurobiol Aging 35: 726 e711–726 e729

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.009

  10. 10.

    Dovey HF, John V, Anderson JP, Chen LZ, de Saint Andrieu P, Fang LY, Freedman SB, Folmer B, Goldbach E, Holsztynska EJ et al (2001 ) Functional gamma‐secretase inhibitors reduce beta‐amyloid peptide levels in brain. J Neurochem 76: 173–181

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00012.x

  11. 11.

    Fukumori A, Fluhrer R, Steiner H, Haass C (2010 ) Three‐amino acid spacing of presenilin endoproteolysis suggests a general stepwise cleavage of gamma‐secretase‐mediated intramembrane proteolysis. J Neurosci 30: 7853–7862

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1443-10.2010

  12. 12.

    Glebov K, Wunderlich P, Karaca I, Walter J (2016 ) Functional involvement of gamma‐secretase in signaling of the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells‐2 (TREM2). J Neuroinflammation 13: 17

    Not in our library10.1186/s12974-016-0479-9

  13. 13.

    Guerreiro R, Hardy J (2013 ) TREM2 and neurodegenerative disease. N Engl J Med 369: 1569–1570

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc1306509

  14. 14.

    Guerreiro R, Wojtas A, Bras J, Carrasquillo M, Rogaeva E, Majounie E, Cruchaga C, Sassi C, Kauwe JS, Younkin S et al (2013 ) TREM2 variants in Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med 368: 117–127

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa1211851

  15. 15.

    Haass C, Hung AY, Schlossmacher MG, Teplow DB, Selkoe DJ (1993 ) beta‐Amyloid peptide and a 3‐kDa fragment are derived by distinct cellular mechanisms. J Biol Chem 268: 3021–3024

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Haass C, Koo EH, Capell A, Teplow DB, Selkoe DJ (1995a ) Polarized sorting of beta‐amyloid precursor protein and its proteolytic products in MDCK cells is regulated by two independent signals. J Cell Biol 128: 537–547

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.128.4.537

  17. 17.

    Haass C, Lemere CA, Capell A, Citron M, Seubert P, Schenk D, Lannfelt L, Selkoe DJ (1995b ) The Swedish mutation causes early‐onset Alzheimer's disease by beta‐secretase cleavage within the secretory pathway. Nat Med 1: 1291–1296

    Not in our library10.1038/nm1295-1291

  18. 18.

    Hamerman JA, Jarjoura JR, Humphrey MB, Nakamura MC, Seaman WE, Lanier LL (2006 ) Cutting edge: inhibition of TLR and FcR responses in macrophages by triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)‐2 and DAP12. J Immunol 177: 2051–2055

    Not in our library10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2051

  19. 19.
  20. 20.

    Jay TR, Miller CM, Cheng PJ, Graham LC, Bemiller S, Broihier ML, Xu G, Margevicius D, Karlo JC, Sousa GL et al (2015 ) TREM2 deficiency eliminates TREM2+ inflammatory macrophages and ameliorates pathology in Alzheimer's disease mouse models. J Exp Med 212: 287–295

    Not in our library10.1084/jem.20142322

  21. 21.

    Jiang T, Tan L, Chen Q, Tan MS, Zhou JS, Zhu XC, Lu H, Wang HF, Zhang YD, Yu JT (2016 ) A rare coding variant in TREM2 increases risk for Alzheimer's disease in Han Chinese. Neurobiol Aging 42: 217.e1–217.e3

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2016.02.023

  22. 22.

    Jonsson T, Stefansson K (2013 ) TREM2 and neurodegenerative disease. N Engl J Med 369: 1568–1569

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmc1306509

  23. 23.

    Kleinberger G, Yamanishi Y, Suarez‐Calvet M, Czirr E, Lohmann E, Cuyvers E, Struyfs H, Pettkus N, Wenninger‐Weinzierl A, Mazaheri F et al (2014 ) TREM2 mutations implicated in neurodegeneration impair cell surface transport and phagocytosis. Sci Transl Med 6: 243ra286

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.3009093

  24. 24.

    Kleinberger G, Brendel M, Mracsko E, Wefers B, Groeneweg L, Xiang X, Focke C, Deussing M, Suarez‐Calvet M, Mazaheri F et al (2017 ) The FTD‐like syndrome causing TREM2 T66M mutation impairs microglia function, brain perfusion, and glucose metabolism. EMBO J 36: 1837–1853

    Not in our library10.15252/embj.201796516

  25. 25.

    Klunemann HH, Ridha BH, Magy L, Wherrett JR, Hemelsoet DM, Keen RW, De Bleecker JL, Rossor MN, Marienhagen J, Klein HE et al (2005 ) The genetic causes of basal ganglia calcification, dementia, and bone cysts: DAP12 and TREM2. Neurology 64: 1502–1507

    Not in our library10.1212/01.wnl.0000160304.00003.ca

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Lichtenthaler SF, Haass C, Steiner H (2011 ) Regulated intramembrane proteolysis–lessons from amyloid precursor protein processing. J Neurochem 117: 779–796

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07248.x

  28. 28.

    Lyman M, Lloyd DG, Ji X, Vizcaychipi MP, Ma D (2014 ) Neuroinflammation: the role and consequences. Neurosci Res 79: 1–12

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neures.2013.10.004

  29. 29.

    Ma J, Zhou Y, Xu J, Liu X, Wang Y, Deng Y, Wang G, Xu W, Ren R, Liu X et al (2014 ) Association study of TREM2 polymorphism rs75932628 with late‐onset Alzheimer's disease in Chinese Han population. Neurol Res 36: 894–896

    Not in our library10.1179/1743132814y.0000000376

  30. 30.

    Nitsch RM, Slack BE, Wurtman RJ, Growdon JH (1992 ) Release of Alzheimer amyloid precursor derivatives stimulated by activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Science 258: 304–307

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1411529

  31. 31.

    Paradowska‐Gorycka A, Jurkowska M (2013 ) Structure, expression pattern and biological activity of molecular complex TREM‐2/DAP12. Hum Immunol 74: 730–737

    Not in our library10.1016/j.humimm.2013.02.003

  32. 32.

    Park JS, Ji IJ, An HJ, Kang MJ, Kang SW, Kim DH, Yoon SY (2015 ) Disease‐associated mutations of TREM2 alter the processing of N‐linked oligosaccharides in the Golgi apparatus. Traffic 16: 510–518

    Not in our library10.1111/tra.12264

  33. 33.

    Piccio L, Deming Y, Del‐Aguila JL, Ghezzi L, Holtzman DM, Fagan AM, Fenoglio C, Galimberti D, Borroni B, Cruchaga C (2016 ) Cerebrospinal fluid soluble TREM2 is higher in Alzheimer disease and associated with mutation status. Acta Neuropathol 131: 925–933

    Not in our library10.1007/s00401-016-1533-5

  34. 34.
  35. 35.

    Saftig P, Lichtenthaler SF (2015 ) The alpha secretase ADAM10: a metalloprotease with multiple functions in the brain. Prog Neurobiol 135: 1–20

    Not in our library10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.10.003

  36. 36.

    Shirotani K, Tomioka M, Kremmer E, Haass C, Steiner H (2007 ) Pathological activity of familial Alzheimer's disease‐associated mutant presenilin can be executed by six different gamma‐secretase complexes. Neurobiol Dis 27: 102–107

    Not in our library10.1016/j.nbd.2007.04.011

  37. 37.

    Song W, Hooli B, Mullin K, Jin SC, Cella M, Ulland TK, Wang Y, Tanzi R, Colonna M (2017 ) Alzheimer's disease‐associated TREM2 variants exhibit either decreased or increased ligand‐dependent activation. Alzheimers Dement 13: 381–387

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jalz.2016.07.004

  38. 38.

    Suarez‐Calvet M, Araque Caballero MA, Kleinberger G, Bateman RJ, Fagan AM, Morris JC, Levin J, Danek A, Ewers M, Haass C et al (2016a ) Early changes in CSF sTREM2 in dominantly inherited Alzheimer's disease occur after amyloid deposition and neuronal injury. Sci Transl Med 8: 369ra178

    Not in our library10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1767

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Thinakaran G, Teplow DB, Siman R, Greenberg B, Sisodia SS (1996 ) Metabolism of the “Swedish” amyloid precursor protein variant in neuro2a (N2a) cells. Evidence that cleavage at the “beta‐secretase” site occurs in the golgi apparatus. J Biol Chem 271: 9390–9397

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.271.16.9390

All 49 references

Cited by papers we hold 14

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.