Temporal Expectations Guide Dynamic Prioritization in Visual Working Memory through Attenuated α Oscillations

Abstract

Although working memory is generally considered a highly dynamic mnemonic store, popular laboratory tasks used to understand its psychological and neural mechanisms (such as change detection and continuous reproduction) often remain relatively “static,” involving the retention of a set number of items throughout a shared delay interval. In the current study, we investigated visual working memory in a more dynamic setting, and assessed the following: (1) whether internally guided temporal expectations can dynamically and reversibly prioritize individual mnemonic items at specific times at which they are deemed most relevant; and (2) the neural substrates that support such dynamic prioritization. Participants encoded two differently colored oriented bars into visual working memory to retrieve the orientation of one bar with a precision judgment when subsequently probed. To test for the flexible temporal control to access and retrieve remembered items, we manipulated the probability for each of the two bars to be probed over time, and recorded EEG in healthy human volunteers. Temporal expectations had a profound influence on working memory performance, leading to faster access times as well as more accurate orientation reproductions for items that were probed at expected times. Furthermore, this dynamic prioritization was associated with the temporally specific attenuation of contralateral α (8–14 Hz) oscillations that, moreover, predicted working memory access times on a trial-by-trial basis. We conclude that attentional prioritization in working memory can be dynamically steered by internally guided temporal expectations, and is supported by the attenuation of α oscillations in task-relevant sensory brain areas. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In dynamic, everyday-like, environments, flexible goal-directed behavior requires that mental representations that are kept in an active (working memory) store are dynamic, too. We investigated working memory in a more dynamic setting than is conventional, and demonstrate that expectations about when mnemonic items are most relevant can dynamically and reversibly prioritize these items in time. Moreover, we uncover a neural substrate of such dynamic prioritization in contralateral visual brain areas and show that this substrate predicts working memory retrieval times on a trial-by-trial basis. This places the experimental study of working memory, and its neuronal underpinnings, in a more dynamic and ecologically valid context, and provides new insights into the neural implementation of attentional prioritization within working memory.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 48

1. 1.

   Astle DE, Summerfield J, Griffin I, Nobre AC. Orienting attention to locations in mental representations. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012;74:146-162.

   Not in our library10.3758/s13414-011-0218-3

2. 2.

   Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255:556-559.

   Not in our library10.1126/science.1736359

3. 3.

   Coull JT, Nobre AC. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J Neurosci. 1998;18:7426-7435.

   Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.18-18-07426.1998

4. 4.

   Cowan N. Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. Psychol Bull. 1988;104:163-191.

   Not in our library10.1037/0033-2909.104.2.163

5. 5.

   D'Esposito M, Postle BR. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:115-142.

   Not in our library10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015031

6. 6.

   Foxe JJ, Snyder AC. The role of alpha band brain oscillations as a sensory suppression mechanism during selective attention. Front Psychol. 2011;2:154.

   Not in our library10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00154

7. 7.

   Foxe JJ, Simpson GV, Ahlfors SP. Parieto-occipital approximately 10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of visual attention mechanisms. Neuroreport. 1998;9:3929-3933.

   Not in our library10.1097/00001756-199812010-00030

8. 8.

   Ghose GM, Maunsell JH. Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing. Nature. 2002;419:616-620.

   Not in our library10.1038/nature01057

9. 9.

   Goldman RI, Stern JM, Engel J, Cohen MS. Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2487-2492.

   Not in our library10.1097/00001756-200212200-00022

10. 10.

    Griffin IC, Nobre AC. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003;15:1176-1194.

    Not in our library10.1162/089892903322598139

11. 11.

    Haegens S, Osipova D, Oostenveld R, Jensen O. Somatosensory working memory performance in humans depends on both engagement and disengagement of regions in a distributed network. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010;31:26-35.

    Not in our library10.1002/hbm.20842

12. 12.

    Haegens S, Nácher V, Luna R, Romo R, Jensen O. α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:19377-19382.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1117190108

13. 13.

    Jensen O, Mazaheri A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010;4:186.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186

14. 14.

    Jensen O, Gelfand J, Kounios J, Lisman JE. Oscillations in the alpha band (9–12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. Cereb Cortex. 2002;12:877-882.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/12.8.877

15. 15.

    Jokisch D, Jensen O. Modulation of gamma and alpha activity during a working memory task engaging the dorsal or ventral stream. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3244-3251.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5399-06.2007

16. 16.

    Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev. 2007;53:63-88.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.003

17. 17.

    Kuo BC, Rao A, Lepsien J, Nobre AC. Searching for targets within the spatial layout of visual short-term memory. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8032-8038.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0952-09.2009

18. 18.

    Landman R, Spekreijse H, Lamme VA. Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Res. 2003;43:149-164.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00402-9

19. 19.

    LaRocque JJ, Lewis-Peacock JA, Drysdale AT, Oberauer K, Postle BR. Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013;25:127-142.

    Not in our library10.1162/jocn_a_00305

20. 20.

    Lewis-Peacock JA, Drysdale AT, Oberauer K, Postle BR. Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012;24:61-79.

    Not in our library10.1162/jocn_a_00140

21. 21.

    Makovski T, Sussman R, Jiang YV. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34:369-380.

    Not in our library10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.369

22. 22.

    Maris E, Oostenveld R. Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;164:177-190.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024

23. 23.

    Mok RM, Myers NE, Wallis G, Nobre AC. Behavioral and neural markers of flexible attention over working memory in aging. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:1831-1842.

    Not in our library10.1093/cercor/bhw011

24. 24.

    Myers NE, Stokes MG, Walther L, Nobre AC. Oscillatory brain state predicts variability in working memory. J Neurosci. 2014;34:7735-7743.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.4741-13.2014

25. 25.

    Nobre A, Correa A, Coull J. The hazards of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17:465-470.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.006

26. 26.

    Oberauer K. Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002;28:411-421.

    Not in our library10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.411

27. 27.

    Oberauer K. Is the focus of attention in working memory expanded through practice? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32:197-214.

    Not in our library10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.197

28. 28.
    FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data · 2011

    No notice
29. 29.

    Pasternak T, Zaksas D. Stimulus specificity and temporal dynamics of working memory for visual motion. J Neurophysiol. 2003;90:2757-2762.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.00422.2003

30. 30.

    Pertzov Y, Bays PM, Joseph S, Husain M. Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013;39:1224-1231.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0030947

31. 31.

    Poch C, Campo P, Barnes GR. Modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations related to retrospectively orienting attention within working memory. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;40:2399-2405.

    Not in our library10.1111/ejn.12589

32. 32.

    Rerko L, Oberauer K. Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013;39:1075-1096.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0031172

33. 33.

    Rohenkohl G, Nobre AC. α oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations. J Neurosci. 2011;31:14076-14084.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.3387-11.2011

34. 34.

    Rohenkohl G, Gould IC, Pessoa J, Nobre AC. Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception. J Vis. 2014;14:pii8.

    Not in our library10.1167/14.4.8

35. 35.

    Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ. Working memory and neural oscillations: α-γ versus θ-γ codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci. 2014;18:16-25.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.010

36. 36.

    Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Heise KF, Gruber WR, Holz E, Karim AA, Glennon M, Gerloff C, Birbaumer N, Hummel FC. Brain oscillatory substrates of visual short-term memory capacity. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1846-1852.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.062

37. 37.

    Souza AS, Oberauer K. In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016;78:1839-1860.

    Not in our library10.3758/s13414-016-1108-5

38. 38.

    Spitzer B, Blankenburg F. Supramodal parametric working memory processing in humans. J Neurosci. 2012;32:3287-3295.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5280-11.2012

39. 39.

    Thut G, Nietzel A, Brandt SA, Pascual-Leone A. Alpha band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. J Neurosci. 2006;26:9494-9502.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.0875-06.2006

40. 40.

    van Dijk H, Schoffelen JM, Oostenveld R, Jensen O. Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts visual discrimination ability. J Neurosci. 2008;28:1816-1823.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.1853-07.2008

41. 41.

    van Ede F, Maris E. Physiological plausibility can increase reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20:567-569.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.006

42. 42.

    van Ede F, de Lange F, Jensen O, Maris E. Orienting attention to an upcoming tactile event involves a spatially and temporally specific modulation of sensorimotor alpha- and beta band oscillations. J Neurosci. 2011;31:2016-2024.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.5630-10.2011

43. 43.

    van Ede F, Köster M, Maris E. Beyond establishing involvement: quantifying the contribution of anticipatory α- and β band suppression to perceptual improvement with attention. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:2352-2362.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.00347.2012

44. 44.

    van Ede F, Szebényi S, Maris E. Attentional modulations of somatosensory alpha, beta and gamma oscillations dissociate between anticipation and stimulus processing. Neuroimage. 2014;97:134-141.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.047

45. 45.

    Wallis G, Stokes M, Cousijn H, Woolrich M, Nobre AC. Frontoparietal and cingulo-opercular networks play dissociable roles in control of working memory. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015;27:2019-2034.

    Not in our library10.1162/jocn_a_00838

46. 46.

    Worden MS, Foxe JJ, Wang N, Simpson GV. Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. J Neurosci. 2000;20:RC63.

    Not in our library10.1523/jneurosci.20-06-j0002.2000

47. 47.

    Zaksas D, Bisley JW, Pasternak T. Motion information is spatially localized in a visual working-memory task. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:912-921.

    Not in our library10.1152/jn.2001.86.2.912

48. 48.

    Zokaei N, Ning S, Manohar S, Feredoes E, Husain M. Flexibility of representational states in working memory. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:853.

    Not in our library10.3389/fnhum.2014.00853

Cited by papers we hold 2

• Functional but not obligatory link between microsaccades and neural modulation by covert spatial attention · 2022
  No notice
• Premembering Experience: A Hierarchy of Time-Scales for Proactive Attention · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.