Prestimulus EEG Power Predicts Conscious Awareness But Not Objective Visual Performance

Abstract

Prestimulus oscillatory neural activity has been linked to perceptual outcomes during performance of psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks. Specifically, the power and phase of low frequency oscillations have been found to predict whether an upcoming weak visual target will be detected or not. However, the mechanisms by which baseline oscillatory activity influences perception remain unclear. Recent studies suggest that the frequently reported negative relationship between α power and stimulus detection may be explained by changes in detection criterion (i.e., increased target present responses regardless of whether the target was present/absent) driven by the state of neural excitability, rather than changes in visual sensitivity (i.e., more veridical percepts). Here, we recorded EEG while human participants performed a luminance discrimination task on perithreshold stimuli in combination with single-trial ratings of perceptual awareness. Our aim was to investigate whether the power and/or phase of prestimulus oscillatory activity predict discrimination accuracy and/or perceptual awareness on a trial-by-trial basis. Prestimulus power (3–28 Hz) was inversely related to perceptual awareness ratings (i.e., higher ratings in states of low prestimulus power/high excitability) but did not predict discrimination accuracy. In contrast, prestimulus oscillatory phase did not predict awareness ratings or accuracy in any frequency band. These results provide evidence that prestimulus α power influences the level of subjective awareness of threshold visual stimuli but does not influence visual sensitivity when a decision has to be made regarding stimulus features. Hence, we find a clear dissociation between the influence of ongoing neural activity on conscious awareness and objective performance.

Shown for reading. Its publisher allows quoting it, not republishing it.

References 79

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

12. 12.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

13. 13.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

35. 35.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

37. 37.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

38. 38.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

39. 39.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

40. 40.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

41. 41.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

42. 42.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

43. 43.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

48. 48.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

49. 49.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

50. 50.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

51. 51.
    The construction of confidence in a perceptual decision · 2012

    No notice
52. 52.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

53. 53.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

54. 54.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

55. 55.
    FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data · 2011

    No notice
56. 56.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

57. 57.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

58. 58.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

59. 59.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

60. 60.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

61. 61.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

62. 62.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

63. 63.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

64. 64.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

65. 65.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

66. 66.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

67. 67.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

68. 68.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

69. 69.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

70. 70.
    Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. · 2017

    No notice
71. 71.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

72. 72.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

73. 73.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

74. 74.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

75. 75.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

76. 76.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

77. 77.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

78. 78.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

79. 79.

    This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 4

• Effects of Rhythmic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Alpha-Band on Visual Perception Depend on Deviation From Alpha-Peak Frequency: Faster Relative Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alpha-Pace Improves Performance · 2022
  Not checked
• Frequency and power of human alpha oscillations drift systematically with time-on-task · 2019
  No notice
• Multiple mechanisms link prestimulus neural oscillations to sensory responses · 2019
  No notice
• Alpha/beta power decreases track the fidelity of stimulus-specific information · 2019
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.