Accessibility, Excellence, Legal Writing and Law Reviews
Niel Andrews
Victoria University Law and Justice Journal · 2014
doi:10.15209/vulj.v4i1.703 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>There are two things wrong with almost all legal writing. One is its style. The other is its content. That, I think, about covers the ground. </span><span>Fred Rodell, ‘Goodbye to Law Reviews’ (1936) 23 Virginia Law </span><span>Review 38, 38. </span></p></div></div></div>
Abstract licence: CC BY
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.