Sociological Shortcomings and Normative Deficits of Regulatory Competition
Christian Joerges
European Papers · 2019
doi:10.15166/2499-8249/303 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2019 4(1), 157-168 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Back to the beginnings: the origins of a new paradigm. - II. The conceptual gist of the controversy. - III. "Back to the Nation State" or "More Europe": Wolfgang Streeck v. Jürgen Habermas. - IV. Institutionalising the united in diversity vision. - V. Instead of an epilogue. | (Abstract) This Article proposes a counter-vision to the regulatory competition model, by building upon conflict-laws constitutionalism. This counter-vision seeks to replace the governance via competitive processes with deliberative political interactions. The approach institutionalizes the United in Diversity slogan, representing a sort of third way between the "back to the nation State" idea, strongly supported by Streek and other commentators, and the Habermasian "More Europe".
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.