A Comparison of Breast-Conserving Surgery and Subcutaneous Mastectomy with Implant Reconstruction in Terms of Postoperative Quality of Life in Patients with Breast Cancer
Abdülkadir Deniz, Kenan Çetin, Hasan Ediz Sıkar and 2 more
Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia · 2019
doi:10.14744/scie.2019.94830 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION[|]The aim of this study was to compare the effects of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subcutaneous mastectomy with implant reconstruction (SMIR) in terms of postoperative psychosocial effects, sexuality, and quality of life.[¤]METHODS[|]Demographic data and clinical breast cancer parameters of patients who underwent BCS (n=48) or SMIR (n=27) between January 2012 and December 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. The data were collected via face-to-face interview using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer-specific submodule, EORTC QLQ-BR23.[¤]RESULTS[|]In this study group, 23 (48%) patients who underwent BCS and 25 (92.6%) patients who underwent SMIR were premenopausal (p<0.01). More patients in the SIMR group underwent axillary dissection [BCS: 11 (22.9%); SMIR: 17 (63%)] and had adjuvant therapy [25 (52%) vs. 23 (85%)] (p<0.01). The number of women working outside the home was greater in the SMIR group [BCS: 13 (27%); SMIR: 18 (66.6%)] (p<0.01). The EORTCQLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires revealed no significant difference between the groups in terms of functional scales (p>0.05). Fatigue scores on the QLQ-C30 were greater for SMIR patients, as well as arm symptoms in the QLQ-BR23 side effects scale (p<0.05).[¤]DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION[|]The results of BCS patients were better than those of SMIR patients on 3 scales, suggesting that BCS may be the first choice of treatment when feasible. For those who are not eligible, SMIR is an option to consider before a modified radical mastectomy.[¤]
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC
References12
12 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.