Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Aristotelian logic and its perspectives

Manuel Correia

Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica · 2017

doi:10.14422/pen.v73.i275.y2017.001 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The legitimacy of Aristotelian logic was questioned in the twentieth century. As a result, the question of whether it should be replaced or restored remains unanswered. To resolve this dilemma there have been new findings that show that it is a theory with internal development, which is independent from the provisions of mathematical logic. In this article, I show how to restore its internal unity, development prospects and independence, through the use of three axioms or rules allowing to incorporate indefinite terms in classical categorical and hypothetical syllogistic, which gives it a capacity able to be compared to monadic first order logic.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.