Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The Missing Pieces of Derrida’s Voice and Phenomenon

Graham Harman

Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture · 2022

doi:10.14394/eidos.jpc.2022.0012 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Jacques Derrida’s critique of Edmund Husserl in Voice and Phenomenon targets several ways in which Husserl’s theory of signs is said to remain dependent on a model of presence, and therefore to be a form of onto-theology. In a sense this simply extends Martin Heidegger’s own critique of Husserl as failing to account for what remains obscure behind any presentation to the mind. Yet Derrida’s critique is ultimately more radical than Heidegger’s, though the radicality is in this case unjustified. Namely, Derrida goes beyond Heidegger’s critique of presence to mount an additional critique of “self-presence,” which is more often known as “identity.” Derrida’s insufficiently motivated critique of identity leads to additional problems for his philosophy.

Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND

References44

    40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

    All 44 references

    Reads

    Read by people on this page

    None yet.

    Checked or read by AI through naulon

    None yet.

    A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

    Are you an author?

    Is this your paper?

    Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.