Epistemology and pedagogy re-examined. The unsuspected potential of John Elliott’s «liberal» pedagogy for teaching content-goals in the social and human sciences
Luis S. VILLACAÑAS DE CASTRO
Teoría de la Educación: Revista Interuniversitaria · 2014
doi:10.14201/teri.12363 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
<p>In an attempt to provide an in-depth analysis of John Elliott’s prolonged contribution to the field of educational and curricular studies, the following paper starts by locating this pedagogue’s work in the context of key ideological debates of the 20th century, whose consequences shaped the realm of the social and the human sciences. Elliott’s stand at this ideological crossroads is defined as <em>liberal</em>, on account of the way he tied his own educational philosophy to the ethical sphere and to the <em>means </em>of education, in opposition to the learning of objective knowledge. The second part of the paper explores Elliott’s pedagogy from the point of view of the potential it may have to suggest a curricular approach that, contrary to his, defends the objectivity of the social and human sciences and the need for students to fulfil and attain certain content-goals. In contrast to Elliott’s intentions, the paper arrives at the conclusion that the fact that students participate in the same social reality they must come to understand and obtain a knowledge of, poses specific pedagogical (emotional and interactional) obstacles that Elliott’s principles would be particularly well suited to overcome.</p>
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.