Myths and Falsehoods about Scientific Realism
Alberto CORDERO
Artefactos · 2018
doi:10.14201/art201872933 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
<p>Selective realist projects seek to strengthen scientific realism, but influential reactions (from anti-realist as well as realist camps) regard selectivist achievements as problematic and misguided developments, because -the story goes- those developments disfigure and devalue realism, transforming it into a position that is not worth taking into account. An examination of the charges formulated against selective realism and their respective historical background suggests, however, that the charges in question rest in myths and falsehoods about the character of realist positions; if so, the charges fail.</p>
Abstract licence: CC BY-NC-ND
References41
40 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 41 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.