Response to: Comment on Rohrscheib et al. 2016 "Intensity of mutualism breakdown is determined by temperature not amplification of Wolbachia genes".

References 10

1. 1.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

2. 2.
   Wolbachia Variants Induce Differential Protection to Viruses in Drosophila melanogaster: A Phenotypic and Phylogenomic Analysis · 2013

   No notice
3. 3.
   Mutualism Breakdown by Amplification of Wolbachia Genes · 2015

   No notice
4. 4.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

8. 8.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.

   Not in our library

10. 10.
    Eukaryotic association module in phage WO genomes from Wolbachia · 2016

    No notice

Cited by papers we hold 1

• The Wolbachia strain wAu provides highly efficient virus transmission blocking in Aedes aegypti · 2018
  No notice

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.