Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 27, 2026.

Time-Resolved Imaging of Single HIV-1 Uncoating In Vitro and in Living Cells

Ashwanth C. Francis, Mariana Marin, Jiong Shi and 2 more

PLOS Pathogens · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005709

Abstract

Disassembly of the cone-shaped HIV-1 capsid in target cells is a prerequisite for establishing a life-long infection. This step in HIV-1 entry, referred to as uncoating, is critical yet poorly understood. Here we report a novel strategy to visualize HIV-1 uncoating using a fluorescently tagged oligomeric form of a capsid-binding host protein cyclophilin A (CypA-DsRed), which is specifically packaged into virions through the high-avidity binding to capsid (CA). Single virus imaging reveals that CypA-DsRed remains associated with cores after permeabilization/removal of the viral membrane and that CypA-DsRed and CA are lost concomitantly from the cores in vitro and in living cells. The rate of loss is modulated by the core stability and is accelerated upon the initiation of reverse transcription. We show that the majority of single cores lose CypA-DsRed shortly after viral fusion, while a small fraction remains intact for several hours. Single particle tracking at late times post-infection reveals a gradual loss of CypA-DsRed which is dependent on reverse transcription. Uncoating occurs both in the cytoplasm and at the nuclear membrane. Our novel imaging assay thus enables time-resolved visualization of single HIV-1 uncoating in living cells, and reveals the previously unappreciated spatio-temporal features of this incompletely understood process.

Full text

From PubMed Central, U.S. National Library of Medicine, as current on Oct 27, 2026. Paragraph numbers are ours, so an answer can point at one.

Introduction

Mature HIV-1 particles contain a cone-shape capsid core made of a hexagonal lattice of the capsid protein (CA) that encases the viral genomic RNA, nucleocapsid (NC), reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (IN) proteins. After HIV-1 fuses with a target cell, the released viral cores go through a series of carefully orchestrated steps that ultimately lead to productive infection. A key early step of HIV-1 entry—referred to as uncoating—is generally defined as (full or partial) shedding of CA from the viral core (reviewed in). Several lines of genetic and functional evidence support the importance of this incompletely understood process in regulating reverse transcription and nuclear import of pre-integration complexes (PICs) (reviewed in). Given its critical role in productive entry, the HIV-1 capsid is considered an attractive target for the development of new antiviral drugs.

HIV-1 uncoating has been traditionally studied by biochemical assays, which revealed a general correlation between capsid stability and infectivity, supporting the importance of timely uncoating. Establishment of the fate-of-capsid assay, which determines the fraction of particulate capsid recovered from cells shortly after infection, allowed assessment of the effects of host factors and pharmacological agents on the core stability. However, most of these assays examine the bulk population of viruses, many of which are not infectious (reviewed in). The more recently developed cyclosporine A (CsA) washout assay enables indirect measurements of HIV-1 uncoating based upon the virus escape from the host restriction factor, TRIMCyp. However, this assay does not provide information regarding the sites of HIV-1 uncoating, and the interpretation of the obtained results is complex.

To elucidate the sites of HIV-1 uncoating, a complementary in-situ uncoating assay has been introduced. This assay visualizes the loss of immunolabeled CA/p24 from the eGFP-Vpr labeled HIV-1 reverse transcription complexes (RTC)/PICs in fixed cells after infection. The inability to follow the dynamics of HIV-1 uncoating in fixed cells underscores the need for live cell imaging techniques.

Direct visualization of capsid uncoating in living cells requires the labeling of both RTC/PIC and CA. Whereas PICs have been visualized by incorporating an integrase-GFP (IN-GFP) chimera into pseudoparticles, attempts to label CA were not successful. CA labeling with a fluorescent protein or a smaller tetracysteine tag adversely affects virus infectivity. Even point mutations in CA can compromise infectivity through altering capsid assembly and/or stability (e.g.,). A recently introduced microscopy assay that may indirectly monitor HIV-1 uncoating live cells is based upon the assertion that a fraction of GFP molecules produced upon cleavage of Gag-iGFP precursor is trapped within an intact mature core and is released at the time of uncoating. However, further validation of the notion that a detectable number of GFP molecules is trapped in a considerable fraction of mature cores is needed.

Here, we developed a novel assay to visualize single HIV-1 uncoating in living cells using the oligomeric cyclophilin A-DsRed chimera (CypA-DsRed) as a novel CA probe. Single virus imaging reveals that this probe efficiently and specifically incorporates into HIV-1 particles without noticeably compromising viral infectivity. Unlike the monomeric version of CypA tagged with a fluorescent protein, CypA-DsRed tightly binds to CA and reports the loss of CA during HIV-1 uncoating. The loss of CypA-DsRed from single cores is delayed upon inhibition of reverse transcription and correlates well with the core stability in vitro and in living cells. Importantly, kinetic measurements revealed that the majority of cores uncoat shortly after viral fusion, whereas a small fraction of incoming cores retain CypA-DsRed for several hours. Collectively, our results show that CypA-DsRed enables time-resolved visualization of single HIV-1 uncoating, thus providing an important new tool for understanding the early steps in HIV-1 infection.

Oligomeric CypA-DsRed efficiently incorporates into HIV-1 and can functionally compensate for the lack of CypA expression in target cells

In light of the extreme sensitivity of HIV-1 to substitutions and insertions in the CA protein, we sought to use the CA-binding protein, CypA, as a less invasive means to label the capsid core. CypA specifically incorporates into HIV-1 particles via association with the CA region of the Gag polyprotein. To assess the efficiency of CypA incorporation into virions, pseudoviruses lacking or containing CypA tagged with different red fluorescent proteins were produced. Fluorescently tagged IN incorporated into virions by co-expressing the Vpr-integrase-superfolderGFP (Vpr-IN-sfGFP) construct was used as a marker for the viral RTC/PICs. CypA/IN colocalization was assessed by imaging single viruses adhered to coverslips. In agreement with the previously published results, CypA tagged with mCherry or with DsRed-derived monomeric mRFP is not efficiently incorporated into viral particles (S1A and S1B Fig) and is thus not compatible with single virus imaging. Such inefficient incorporation of labeled CypA, in spite of abundant expression in virus-producing cells (S1C Fig), is consistent with its relatively low affinity (7–16 μM) for CA.

We reasoned that the CypA recruitment into HIV-1 virions could be improved by increasing its binding avidity. Indeed, a previous study has demonstrated that multimerization of CypA promotes its binding to the HIV-1 capsid. To create oligomeric CypA and make it visible at the same time, we fused CypA in frame with the tetrameric DsRed fluorescent protein from Discosoma. Indeed, DsRed and CypA-DsRed, but not mRFP or CypA-mRFP, are preferentially present in an oligomeric form in cell lysates, and these oligomers are converted into monomers after boiling (S2A Fig). This result implies that DsRed drives the oligomerization of CypA, as evidenced by the ~200 kDa band expected for a CypA-DsRed tetramer.

Supporting the notion that oligomerization increases the binding avidity of CypA to Gag, co-localization of CypA-DsRed with IN-sfGFP was on order of magnitude higher than that monomeric CypA-mCherry or CypA-mRFP (Fig 1A and S1A Fig). Western blotting confirmed that CypA-DsRed is abundantly present in virions, but does not affect virus budding or maturation (S2B Fig). Interestingly, overexpression of CypA in producer cells does not improve its incorporation into virions compared to endogenously expressed CypA, in agreement with a defined ~1:10 stoichiometry of CypA/Gag reported previously. In contrast, CypA-DsRed is present in virions in approximately 5-fold excess compared to CypA-mCherry (S2C Fig). The immunoblotting results are consistent with the analyses of IN-sfGFP-associated fluorescence signals suggesting a 4-fold better incorporation of CypA-DsRed over CypA-mCherry (S1B Fig). Based on these results, the apparent CypA-DsRed/Gag stoichiometry in our preparation can be estimated to be in the order of ~1:2.

The specificity of CypA-DsRed incorporation into virions was probed using viruses containing either CA (G89V) or CypA (H126Q) mutants that abrogate the interaction between these proteins. Viruses containing the CA G89V mutant failed to efficiently incorporate detectable amounts of CypA-DsRed and, conversely, CypA-H126Q-DsRed was virtually absent in virions containing wild-type (WT) CA (Fig 1A).

We next examined the retention of tagged CypA constructs by virions following a mild permeabilization of coverslip-adhered viruses with saponin, which forms small pores in the viral membrane. Whereas nearly all virus-incorporated CypA-mRFP leaked instantly after saponin treatment, CypA-DsRed was retained (S1D and S1E Fig). The above results show that oligomeric CypA-DsRed: (1) is efficiently and specifically incorporated into HIV-1 particles by tightly binding to the CA region of the Gag polyprotein; and (2) is retained by the viral cores when the integrity of the viral membrane is compromised.

CypA-DsRed incorporation did not significantly affect the fusion-competence or specific infectivity of particles pseudotyped with the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus G protein (VSV-G, Fig 1B and 1C). Parallel samples were inoculated in the presence of the immune-suppressive drug CsA, which binds CypA with high affinity and blocks its interactions with CA. In agreement with the previously published studies, CsA did not significantly affect the virus infectivity in HeLa-derived TZM-bl cells (Fig 1C).

We then asked whether CypA-DsRed could also remain associated with HIV-1 cores entering the target cells and thus modulate virus infectivity. Toward this goal, the effect of CypA-DsRed on Jurkat cells infection, which is known to depend on endogenously expressed CypA, was evaluated. Since the virus-incorporated CypA (from producer cells) does not play a significant role in infection of Jurkat cells, we hypothesized that this lack of effect is due to a quick loss of monomeric CypA from incoming HIV-1 cores. This hypothesis was tested by measuring the effect of CypA-DsRed incorporation on infection of parental (CypA+/+) and CypA-deficient (CypA-/-) Jurkat cells. Whereas infection of parental cells was not considerably affected by CypA-DsRed, this marker enhanced the infection of cells lacking CypA by 2-3-fold (Fig 1D and S3 Fig). Thus, not only does CypA-DsRed not adversely affect HIV-1 infectivity, but it can functionally complement the lack of CypA expression in target cells. This finding supports the notion that CypA-DsRed tightly binds to HIV-1 CA and is retained by the viral cores released into the target cells.

Having established that virus-incorporated CypA-DsRed does not adversely affect the HIV-1 infectivity, we asked whether over-expression of this marker in target cells can modulate infection. Transient expression of CypA-DsRed in target 293T cells did not significantly affect infectivity of unlabeled VSV-G pseudotyped particles (S4 Fig). In contrast, expression of the HIV-1 restriction factor TRIMCyp markedly reduced the infectivity and this restriction was rescued by CsA treatment (S4 Fig).

Release of CypA-DsRed correlates with the loss of CA/p24 from HIV-1 cores in vitro

To further assess the stability of CypA-DsRed interactions with mature HIV-1 capsids, viruses were adhered to coverslips, permeabilized with TX-100 in the presence of CsA or DMSO (vehicle control), fixed and immunostained for CA/p24. Co-labeling the particles with IN-sfGFP, which is a part of the nucleoprotein complex contained within the capsid, provided a stable reference signal for particles loosing CA/p24. Following the permeabilization, most CypA-DsRed puncta remained colocalized with IN-sfGFP for the duration of incubation with DMSO at room temperature (Fig 1E). CsA treatment of permeabilized particles rapidly displaced CypA-DsRed from IN-sfGFP puncta, markedly reducing the extent of colocalization without considerably affecting the p24 signal (Fig 1E). CsA-mediated displacement of CypA-DsRed from the permeabilized viral particles occurred immediately after addition of the drug (S5 Fig and S1 Movie).

Biochemical studies have shown that detergent-treated purified HIV-1 capsids tend to disassemble in a temperature-dependent manner and that point mutations in CA can strongly modulate the core stability. We thus asked whether the CypA-DsRed loss form immobilized pseudoviruses after permeabilization is accompanied by loss of CA/p24 at 37°C. Co-labeled pseudoviruses were adhered to coverslips, permeabilized and fixed after varied incubation times. The loss of CA from IN-labeled spots was assessed by immunostaining with anti-p24 antibodies. After permeabilization, the CypA-DsRed foci disappeared with a half-time of ~10 min and were lost by 80 min at 37°C, whereas the number of IN-sfGFP puncta remained virtually constant (Fig 2A and 2C and S2 Movie). Once initiated, the release of CypA-DsRed from individual cores was completed in less than 1 min (faster than the temporal resolution of these imaging experiments, Fig 2B). Importantly, p24 and CypA-DsRed puncta disappeared at the same rate (Fig 2A and 2C), implying that the CypA-based marker was released from the viral cores along with the capsid protein.

To ascertain that the release of CypA-DsRed correlates with the HIV-1 core stability, pseudoviruses containing the hyperstable E45A or the unstable K203A CA mutant were prepared and imaged. CypA-DsRed was lost from the permeabilized E45A particles much slower (half-time ~25 min) than from WT CA-containing particles, whereas virtually all CypA puncta disappeared immediately after permeabilization of the K203A viruses (Fig 2C). As with the WT CA, the rates of p24 loss from IN-sfGFP puncta for the two CA mutants were virtually superimposable with the rates of CypA-DsRed loss (Fig 2C). The concomitant release of CypA-DsRed and p24 from permeabilized viral cores and correlation between the core stability and the rate of CypA-DsRed loss strongly suggest that CypA-DsRed is released as a result of CA dissociation from the IN-sfGFP-labeled cores.

Since a human cytosol extract has been reported to stabilize the in vitro assembled CA-nucleocapsid complexes, we asked whether this effect could be observed with bona fide HIV-1 cores. A cytosolic extract from TZM-bl cells markedly inhibited of both p24 and CypA-DsRed loss from the IN-sfGFP puncta (Fig 2A and 2D). This important finding shows that human cytosol potently stabilizes the cores obtained by permeabilization of HIV-1 particles that otherwise tend to uncoat under physiological salt and pH conditions.

The majority of HIV-1 cores lose CypA-DsRed shortly after viral fusion

We next analyzed the dissociation of CypA-DsRed from the HIV-1 cores following their release into the cytoplasm as a result of viral fusion. Viral entry/fusion was synchronized by pre-binding viruses to cells in the cold and quickly raising the temperature to 37°C. Live cell imaging revealed that CypA-DsRed was lost from single IN-sfGFP puncta with a half-time ~23 min after the initiation of virus entry (Fig 3A). This time includes the virus uptake and fusion with acidic endosomes followed by dissociation of the CypA marker from the core. To dissect the virus fusion/uncoating steps, we took advantage of the ability of CsA to quickly displace CypA-DsRed from HIV-1 cores (S5 Fig). The loss of CypA-DsRed in the presence of CsA added at the time of initiating virus entry (0 min) should thus reflect the kinetics of single virus fusion, more specifically, the time of formation of a small fusion pore through which this marker is released into the cytoplasm. Indeed, the kinetics of CypA-DsRed loss from IN-sfGFP particles was considerably faster (half-time ~10 min) in the presence than in the absence of CsA (compare Fig 3A and 3B). These findings reveal a relatively short life span of intact post-fusion HIV-1 cores, which lost CypA-DsRed with half-time of ~13 min (23 min– 10 min). This apparent instability is in stark contrast with the stable association of CypA-DsRed with viral cores at 37°C in the presence of human cytosol in vitro (Fig 2A and 2D). It is thus possible that, in agreement with the recent reports, functional cytoskeleton/molecular motors or other host factors absent in cytosolic extracts drive HIV-1 uncoating in living cells.

Single particle tracking showed that CypA-DsRed was frequently lost in one relatively quick step, typically lasting ~2 min (Fig 3C and S3 Movie), which is similar to in vitro uncoating profiles (Fig 2B). A much less frequent gradual loss of the CypA signal (Fig 3D and S4 Movie) was also detected. The quick decay of the CypA signal from individual puncta likely reflects rapid disassembly of the HIV-1 capsid after fusion. The dramatic inhibition of CypA-DsRed loss from permeabilized particles in vitro in the presence of cytosol (Fig 2A and 2D) argues against the alternative possibility that CypA somehow dissociates from intact post-fusion cores without the loss of CA.

The relationship between the CypA-DsRed release and HIV-1 capsid stability in the cytoplasm was further examined using the hyperstable (E45A) and unstable (K203A) CA mutants. Whereas the E45A and WT cores lost CypA-DsRed at similar rates, this process was approximately twice as rapid for the K203A cores (Fig 3A). This pattern is somewhat similar to the kinetics of CypA-DsRed loss from permeabilized particles in vitro (Fig 2C). In control experiments performed in the presence of CsA to displace the intraviral CypA-DsRed, the rates of viral fusion were identical for WT and the two mutants (Fig 3B). The correlation between the CypA-DsRed retention time and capsid stability implies that this marker is lost due to virus uncoating after fusion. Taken together, the above results establish correlation between the capsid stability and CypA-DsRed retention by native cores in vitro and by post-fusion cores in living cells, thus supporting the notion that CypA-DsRed loss reflects HIV-1 uncoating.

The CypA-DsRed release from WT and mutant capsids approached plateau by 80 min at 37°C (Fig 3A). To determine whether any post-fusion cores retained CypA-DsRed at this time point, CsA was added, and imaging was continued for 40 min. CsA displaced CypA-DsRed from an additional 5% and 7.5% of the WT and E45A post-fusion cores, respectively, demonstrating that a small fraction of cores remained intact at that time point (Fig 3A, Inset and S5 Movie). By contrast, none of the double-labeled K203A cores responded to CsA treatment, as all CypA signal from post-fusion cores was lost by 80 min (Fig 3A). Thus, the majority of HIV-1 cores lose CypA-DsRed (uncoat) shortly after fusion, but a small fraction (~5%) of cores retains CypA-DsRed for longer time.

We also examined the effects of the capsid-targeting small molecule HIV-1 inhibitors PF74 and BI-2, which have been reported to modulate the core stability. The loss of CypA-DsRed from IN-sfGFP puncta was accelerated in the presence of BI-2 (Fig 3E), in agreement with the published biochemical data. By contrast, PF74, which appears to alter the stability of the viral core in a concentration-dependent manner, modestly delayed the CypA-DsRed loss at 10 μM (Fig 3E).

Initiation of reverse transcription facilitates loss of CypA-DsRed from post-fusion cores

Several studies have established a link between reverse transcription and capsid uncoating. We therefore examined the effect of reverse transcription on the apparent stability of post-fusion HIV-1 cores measured by the loss of CypA-DsRed. The RT inhibitor Nevirapine delayed the loss of CypA-DsRed from IN-sfGFP labeled cores compared to the untreated control (Fig 3F). As a result, 17% of the post-fusion cores remained intact (retained CypA-DsRed) by 80 min post-infection in the presence of Nevirapine—a more than 3-fold increase relative to untreated viruses (Fig 3F, Inset). In contrast to the observed effect of Nevirapine on early loss of CypA-DsRed, viral DNA synthesis is completed at much later times after infection ( and S6A Fig). To investigate the effect of early steps in reverse transcription on HIV-1 uncoating, we examined the kinetics of CypA-DsRed loss from post-fusion cores containing the inactive RT D185N mutant, which is unable to synthesize viral cDNA, or the E478Q mutant that can initiate viral cDNA synthesis but unable to proceed through the first strand transfer step as a result of a mutation in the RNase H pocket. In good agreement with the Nevirapine data, the RT-inactivating D185N mutation delayed the loss of CypA-DsRed (Fig 3F). However, the kinetics of CypA-DsRed loss from virions lacking the RNase H activity was not significantly different from the WT virus (Fig 3F). Collectively, these results suggest that the initiation of reverse transcription is sufficient to destabilize the HIV-1 core at early times post-fusion.

A minor fraction of post-fusion cores retain CypA-DsRed for a few hours prior to uncoating

In order to detect rare post-fusion cores at late times after infection, we inoculated cells with a ~50-fold higher amount of virus (MOI 0.4) compared to that used for single virus imaging in live cells (see Materials and Methods). Under these conditions, a considerable number of IN-sfGFP/CypA-DsRed labeled particles, likely a mixture of endosome-resident viruses and stable post-fusion cores, was observed at late times after infection (Fig 4A). The identical rates of reduction in the fractions of IN puncta containing CypA-DsRed and IN puncta positive for p24 staining (Fig 4B) are consistent with slow uncoating of a fraction of HIV-1 cores. To distinguish between virions trapped in endosomes and stable post-fusion cores, cells were treated with CsA prior to fixation. Intact post-fusion cores, defined as double-labeled particles losing CypA-DsRed in response to CsA treatment (Fig 4C and S6 Movie), were observed as late as 6 h.p.i. The average CypA and p24 signals from the IN-sfGFP spots were significantly reduced after CsA treatment (Fig 4D). Consistent with this result, CsA treatment markedly diminished IN/CypA and p24/CypA colocalization (S7 Fig). The CsA-mediated reduction in the mean p24 signal (Fig 4D) is unexpected and may be indicative of HIV-1 capsid destabilization as a result of CypA-DsRed displacement.

At 2 h.p.i., a large fraction of double-labeled particles lost CypA-DsRed after addition of CsA (Fig 4E), whereas CsA-induced loss of the CypA marker was not detected when experiments were done in the presence of NH4Cl (S7 Fig). This result shows that about half of puncta in the cytoplasm at 2 h.p.i. are native post-fusion cores containing CypA-DsRed. As expected, this number dropped between 2 and 5 h.p.i. (Fig 4E). In agreement with the stabilizing effect of Nevirapine on HIV-1 cores early after fusion (Fig 3F), a greater number of stable post-fusion cores was detected in Nevirapine-treated cells between 2 and 5 h.p.i. (Fig 4E). We also observed correlation between long-term retention of CypA-DsRed by post-fusion cores and the capsid stability, using the hyperstable (E45A) and unstable (K203A) CA mutants (Fig 4F). Thus, a small fraction of HIV-1 cores does not lose CypA-DsRed for several hours after viral fusion and appear to remain intact. Retention of CypA-DsRed by post-fusion HIV-1 cores for >6 h.p.i. further confirms that this marker is shed along with CA as a result of uncoating.

Late HIV-1 uncoating occurs gradually and is promoted by reverse transcription

HIV-1 uncoating at late times after infection was examined by tracking CypA-DsRed/IN-sfGFP- labeled cores in living cells. Time-lapse images were acquired for 80 min, starting at 2, 4 or 6 h.p.i. To identify the pool of post-fusion cores that retained CypA-DsRed by the end of the imaging session, CsA was added at 80 min, and imaging was continued for additional 40 min. CsA displaced CypA-DsRed from the post-fusion cores, but not from unfused virions (Fig 5A). Within each 80 min observation window, only 7–16% of post-fusion cores (depending on the time post-infection) lost the entire CypA-DsRed signal to the background level (Fig 5B). This initial analysis did not include partial loss of the CA marker observed for a significant fraction of particles exhibiting a gradual loss of CypA-DsRed (see Fig 5D and 5E).

Single particle tracking revealed that a large fraction of cores did not exhibit significant loss of CypA-DsRed prior to CsA addition (referred to as “no release”, Fig 5C), while those that lost the marker could be categorized into two types–“slow” and “quick” release (Fig 5D and 5E). The quick release was defined as >70% loss of the CypA-DsRed signal within 80 min (Fig 5E), while slow release corresponded to a drop in the CypA signal down to 30%-60% of the initial value (Fig 5D). In contrast, the levels of IN-sfGFP and CypA-DsRed signals remained steady in control (not fused) particles before and after addition of CsA (S8 Fig).

The relative weights of no release, slow and quick CypA-DsRed release events for randomly analyzed particles are shown in Fig 5G. To ascertain that the observed loss of CypA-DsRed was due to shedding of CA from post-fusion cores, imaging experiments were done in the presence of Nevirapine, which delayed the CypA-DsRed loss at early and late times after infection (Figs 3A and 4E). Consistent with these effects, a majority of post-fusion cores retained the CypA marker in the presence of Nevirapine (e.g. Fig 5F). Analysis of different CypA-DsRed release profiles in Nevirapine-treated cells confirmed that the inhibition of reverse transcription disfavored the slow loss and virtually abrogated the quick loss of the CypA marker (Fig 5G). Collectively, suppression of CypA-DsRed loss by Nevirapine, along with the remarkably stable signals from most post-fusion particles, strongly imply that CypA-DsRed is shed as a consequence of CA dissociation from RTC/PICs and is thus a reliable marker for HIV-1 uncoating.

We also asked whether the observed uncoating events (loss of CypA-DsRed) exhibited a preference for the cytoplasm vs. the nuclear membrane. To simplify analysis, only a subset of particles exhibiting quick loss of CypA-DsRed (the same subset as in Fig 5B) between 4 and 8 h.pi. were examined. For these events, the distance from the nuclear membrane at the point of complete loss of red signal could be readily measured. The events within 1 μm from the nuclear membrane were categorized as perinuclear, while more distant events were considered cytoplasmic. To determine the probability of uncoating in each category, the number of CypA-DsRed release events was normalized to the respective number of post-fusion cores (those that uncoated in response to CsA) in each category. This analysis showed that the probability of quick release of CypA-DsRed near the nucleus at 4–8 h.p.i. was about 4-fold higher than in the cytoplasm (Fig 6A).

We next asked whether post-fusion HIV-1 cores that uncoated near the nucleus were docked at the nuclear membrane. Only double-labeled post-fusion cores, identified based upon their sensitivity to CsA added at the end of imaging session, were analyzed. Inspection of single particle tracks revealed the existence of the apparently stationary post-fusion cores undergoing restricted movement and relatively mobile cores (Fig 6B). The latter cores were observed both in the cytoplasm and at the nuclear membrane. The cytoplasmic cores typically exhibited relatively quick, sometimes directional motion, as evidenced by their trajectory (Fig 6C) and mean squared displacement (MSD) analyses (Fig 6E, dark cyan circles). By contrast, a fraction of perinuclear cores remained stationary (Fig 6D and 6E, orange circles), consistent with their docking at the nuclear membrane. The 10-fold lower diffusion coefficient of the stationary vs. mobile cores (Fig 6F) further supports that notion that some cores were docked at the nuclear membrane. Analysis of the CypA-DsRed release profiles did not reveal a clear correlation between core uncoating and restricted motion: loss of CypA-DsRed was observed both for mobile and stationary particles (Fig 6C and 6D show slow release of CypA-DsRed). We often observed uncoating initiated in the cytoplasm that continued after particle docking at the nuclear membrane (S9 Fig). To conclude, whereas further experiments and more detailed analyses are needed to delineate the relationship between core mobility and uncoating, our preliminary spatial analysis indicates that quick CypA-DsRed release events from the stable post-fusion cores tend to occur in the vicinity of the nuclear envelope.

Discussion

In this study, we developed a novel approach to detect the loss of CA from incoming HIV-1 cores in living cells, using the oligomeric CypA-DsRed marker. Previous attempts to label HIV-1 CA with a monomeric fluorescently tagged CypA were unsuccessful, most likely because of its low affinity for CA, estimated to be in the micromolar range. In contrast, CypA-DsRed specifically incorporates into virions and remains bound to CA in the context of a mature core, enabling the visualization of single virus entry/uncoating without the need for genetic or pharmacologic manipulations that could perturb multiple functions of the CA protein. Importantly, the CypA-DsRed binding to the core is sufficiently tight to prevent its release after removal of the viral membrane in vitro or within several hours after virus fusion with cells. Except when displaced by CsA, CypA-DsRed is lost from IN-labeled RTC/PICs concurrently with loss of CA/p24.

CypA has been implicated in multiple steps of HIV-1 entry, including: (i) CA uncoating; (ii) virus restriction by rhesus TRIM5α; (iii) evasion of innate immune sensing; (iv) reverse transcription; and (v) post-nuclear entry events. These functions have been attributed to CypA expressed in target cells, whereas the producer cell-expressed CypA that is incorporated into virions has been demonstrated to be inconsequential for infection. Remarkably, however, the virus-incorporated CypA-DsRed was able to functionally complement the lack of CypA in the target Jurkat CypA-/- cell line (Fig 1D). This important result supports the notion that, contrary to the virus-incorporated CypA that is quickly shed from post-fusion cores and replaced by CypA in target cells, the oligomeric CypA-DsRed remains tightly associated with the core. Interestingly, unlike the artificial dimeric and trimeric CypA constructs that bind more tightly to CA and inhibit HIV-1 infection when expressed in target cells, CypA-DsRed expressed in target 293T cells did not affect HIV-1 infection (S4 Fig). The basis for this difference is currently unclear. We surmise that a long flexible linker between CypA and DsRed allows for multivalent interactions with the core by adapting to the CA lattice rather than disrupting it. Whereas we cannot rule out an effect of CypA-DsRed on the stability of the HIV-1 core, as has been reported for monomeric CypA, the lack of a negative effect on HIV-1 infectivity when expressed in producer or target cells, along with the existence of apparently intact post-fusion cores (that shed CypA-DsRed upon CsA addition) in the cytoplasm several hours after synchronized infection, show the utility of CypA-DsRed as a marker for HIV-1 uncoating.

Our conclusion that CypA-DsRed reports the dissociation of CA from the viral core is also strongly supported by the excellent correlation between the HIV-1 capsid stability and loss of this marker, along with p24, from IN-labeled cores in vitro. Unlike other reported in vitro uncoating assays, the CypA-based assay enables the visualization of CA on mature native HIV-1 cores without the need for additional manipulations (e.g., ultracentrifugation) known to destabilize the fragile cores. In agreement with a previous study of HIV-1 core stability, we also observed that cytosolic extract from human cells inhibited the loss of CypA-DsRed/CA in vitro, thus enabling biochemical approaches to identify host factors that regulate the HIV-1 uncoating. Although the loss of CypA-DsRed from IN-labeled puncta in living cells exhibited more complex phenotypes than in in vitro experiments, we were able to demonstrate correlation between loss of this marker and the core stability using CA mutants.

We emphasize that an observed loss of CypA-DsRed should not necessarily be interpreted as complete dissociation of CA. Due to the relatively high background signal in living cells, single virus imaging is only possible with a threshold number of fluorescent protein molecules in these particles. Thus, a small fraction of CA could remain associated with pre-integration complexes, as recently reported in fixed cell imaging studies.

Three principal models for HIV-1 uncoating in target cells have been proposed (Fig 7, reviewed in). Uncoating may occur: (1) immediately after virus fusion; (2) gradually, during cytoplasmic trafficking of post-fusion cores; and (3) at the nuclear pore. In this study, we observed intracellular particles that appear to represent all three types of uncoating. We found that, surprisingly, the majority of HIV-1 cores lost CypA-DsRed soon after release into the cytoplasm. Since HIV-1 cores are quite stable in vitro in the presence of cytosolic extract (Fig 2D), such a dramatic loss of integrity could be caused by innate host factors that induce HIV-1 uncoating and/or by initiation of reverse transcription (Fig 3F), which is unlikely to occur in our in vitro experiments. In stark contrast to the rapidly-uncoating cores, a small fraction of particles (<5%) retained CypA-DsRed for several hours after infection. The very slow loss of CypA-DsRed signal from these cores, together with inhibition of CypA-DsRed loss by Nevirapine, supports the gradual uncoating model. Finally, a fraction of late-uncoating cores that approached the nuclear membrane exhibited restricted movement (Fig 6B and 6C), which is consistent with HIV-1 uncoating at the nuclear pore. Additional single particle tracking experiments using CypA-DsRed, combined with CA mutants exhibiting nuclear entry defects, will be useful for validating this model. Note that our findings apply to HeLa-derived cells that differ from other cell types in their uncoating/infection requirements.

An important question that remains to be answered is which of the observed uncoating events—early or late—lead to productive infection. There is biochemical and virological evidence supporting early HIV-1 uncoating. The functional CsA washout assay, which relies on the kinetics of HIV-1 escape from the host restriction factor TRIMCyp, yielded a half-time of ~25–45 min for HIV-1 uncoating in owl monkey cells and ~9 min in HeLa-derived cells. The latter value is close to our estimate of the half-time of post-fusion HIV-1 uncoating in HeLa-derived cells (~13 min), which is delayed upon inhibition of reverse transcription (Fig 3F). However, since the structural basis for HIV-1 escape from TRIMCyp restriction in the CsA washout assay has not been fully elucidated, the rare post-fusion cores which survive for several hours in the cytoplasm may also contribute to productive entry. This notion is supported by the slow kinetics of reverse transcription observed in functional assays ( and Fig 6A) and by inhibition of the late CypA-DsRed release events by Nevirapine (Figs 4E and 5G).

In conclusion, we have developed a novel method for elucidating the HIV-1 uncoating process in living cells and in vitro, using CypA-DsRed as a marker for CA. This technological advance provides a powerful means to elucidate the spatial and temporal details of HIV-1 uncoating and the role of host factors in regulating this critical step of virus entry.

Plasmids, cell lines and reagents

CypA was PCR-amplified from genomic DNA and cloned into pmRFP-N1 (Clontech, Mountainview CA). The plasmid pCypA-DsRed and pCypA-mCherry was constructed by replacing the mRFP in CypA-mRFP with respective fluorescent proteins after PCR amplification and cloning between BamHI/NotI sites. CypA was linked to a fluorescent protein through a flexible linker GSGGSGGSGGQSTVPRARDPPVAT. pMDG-VSVG expressing VSV-G glycoprotein, a gift from Dr. J. Young (The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA), the plasmid encoding for the pNL4.3 Nef-HA was a gift from Dr. Massimo Pizzato (University of Trento). The Vpr-IN-sfGFP plasmid was a gift from Dr. Anna Cereseto (University of Trento). The pR9ΔEnv vector containing the WT CA or CA mutations E45A, and K203A were described previously. Mutations encoding the G89V substitution in CA and the E478Q substitution in the RNase H domain of RT were introduced into pR9ΔEnv vector through site-directed mutagenesis. A mutation was introduced by site directed mutagenesis into the pCypA-DsRed plasmid at amino acid position H126 to generate the pCypA-H126Q-DsRed construct. Retroviral vector LNCX2 encoding TRIM-CypA-eCFP was a gift from Dr. Paul Bieniasz.

The following reagents were obtained from the NIH AIDS Reference and Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH: pNL4-3.Luc.R-E- from Dr. Nathaniel Landau, pMM310 plasmid encoding the BlaM-Vpr was donated by Dr. Michael Miller; TZM-bl cells expressing CD4, CXCR4 and CCR5 were donated by Drs. J.C. Kappes and X. Wu; Jurkat T and Jurkat.T CypA-/- cells were donated by Drs. D. Braaten and J. Luban; anti-p24 antibody AG3.0 was donated by Dr. J. Alan; RT inhibitor Nevirapine; and HIV protease inhibitor Saquinavir; HIV Immunoglobulin (HIV-IG), donated by Dr. Luiz Barbosa.

HEK293T/17 cells were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA). 293T/17 and TZM-bl cells were grown in high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Mediatech, Manassas VA) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 100 U/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Gemini Bio-Products, Sacramento, CA). The growth medium for HEK 293T/17 was supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml G418 sulfate (Mediatech, Manassas VA). Jurkat T-cells and Jurkat T-cells CypA-/- were propagated in RPMI-1640 medium.

CsA was obtained from (Calbiochem), dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 50 mM and stored at -20°C. The HIV-1 CA binding inhibitors, PF74 (PF-3450074) and BI-2, were described previously. The CCF4-AM substrate for the BlaM assay, GeneBLAzer in vivo Detection Kit was from Invitrogen, Bright-Glo luciferase assay kit was from Promega. Saponin was obtained from Sigma Aldrich.

Virus production, quantification and western blotting

Fluorescently labeled pseudoviruses were produced and characterized, as described previously. Briefly, HEK293T/17 cells grown in a 100 mm dish were transfected with the plasmids encoding for the HIV-1 backbone pR9ΔEnv (8 μg), along with VSV-G (1 μg), Vpr-IN-sfGFP (4 μg) and CypA-fluorescent protein plasmids (4 μg) using the JetPrime Transfection reagent (VWR, Radnor, PA). Control viruses were produced without CypA-DsRed. For infectivity assays, pseudoviruses were produced as above but without the Vpr-IN-sfGFP plasmid. Alternatively, NL4-3-based pseudoviruses were produced by co-transfecting VSV-G (1 μg), pNL4.3R-E-Luc (8 μg), Nef-HA (4 μg) and CypA-DsRed (4 μg). Where noted, saquinavir was used at a final concentration of 500 nM to generate immature particles. Twelve hours after transfection, the medium was replaced with 7 ml of fresh DMEM/10% FBS without phenol red, and the sample incubated for additional 36 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Viral supernatant was collected, pooled, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter and quantified for p24 content using AlphaLISA immunoassay kit (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) or for the RT activity using the PERT protocol. Viruses were aliquoted and stored at -80°C.

For Western blotting, the viruses were pelleted through a 20% sucrose cushion by centrifuging at 100,000×g for 2 h at 4°C, using the SW41 swinging bucket rotor (Beckman, Indianapolis IN), re-suspended in PBS and lysed with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. Equal amounts of p24 were loaded onto a 12% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane, blocked with PBS/0.1% Tween20/10% Blotting-grade Blocker (Bio-Rad) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with HIV IG (1∶3000 dilution), rabbit anti-Cyclophilin A antibody (Millipore) (1∶500 dilution), or anti-α-tubulin (Sigma) (1∶3000 dilution) in PBS/0.1% Tween20/5% Blocking-grade Blocker overnight at 4°C. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (HRP) goat anti-rabbit antibody (1∶500 dilution, Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas), HRP-Protein G (1∶2000, Bio-Rad) or HRP-rabbit anti-mouse (Millipore) were employed for protein detection using a chemiluminescence reagent from GE Healthcare. The resulting signal was visualized on the Chem-Doc Imager (Bio-Rad). PrecisionPlus Protein Standards (Kaleidoscope Bio-Rad) were used for molecular weight markers.

Virus-cell fusion and infectivity assays

Virus fusion activity was measured using the BlaM assay, as described previously. For these experiments, pseudoviruses were produced by transfection with plasmids expressing pR9ΔEnv, VSV-G, BlaM-Vpr, with or without the plasmids expressing CypA-DsRed. Infectivity assays were performed using TZM-bl cells or Jurkat cells. Indicated amounts of p24 or RT units of viral preparations were spinoculated onto cells at 1,500×g, 4°C for 30 min and cells were cultures with or without CsA (5 μM) for 48 h prior to reading the luciferase activity, as described in.

CypA displacement and core-stability measurements in vitro

Pseudoviruses co-labeled with IN-sfGFP and CypA-DsRed were allowed to bind to 8-well chambered coverslips or to 96-well black glass-bottom sensoplates (Greiner Bio-One, Monroe, NC) treated with Cell-Tak cell and tissue adhesive (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Virions were imaged before and after treatment with 0.002% TX-100 for 30 sec at room temperature. Permeabilized viruses were incubated with CsA (5 μM), or DMSO (vehicle control) for 5 min, fixed with 2% PFA, and immunostained for CA/p24. For core-stability measurements, coverslip bound viruses were permeabilized as above and washed. Samples were further incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 0, 5, 10, 20, 40 or 80 min and fixed with PFA. Control samples were fixed with PFA and then permeabilized with 0.1% TX-100 and subject to immune-labeling with mouse anti-p24 AG3.0 antibody. In parallel samples, TX-100-permeabilized viruses were treated with a cytosolic extract (25 ng/μl) from TZM-bl cells for 80 min and fixed with PFA. Cytosolic extract was obtained by treating 1×107 cells with 200 μl of 10 μg/ml digitonin for 10 min on ice. The supernatant was collected and cleared of cellular debris by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 5 min. Images of 4 randomly chosen fields of view were acquired for each time point.

Analysis of CypA-DsRed loss from post-fusion cores by fixed cell imaging

For fixed cell analyses, uniform virus binding across the samples was ensured by spinoculating onto coverslip-grown TZM-bl cells placed into a 24-well plate. Briefly, ~100,000 TZM-bl cells were grown on poly-L-lysine coated round coverslips overnight in a 24-well plate and infected by spinoculation at 1500×g, 4°C for 20 min with 1–1.5 ng of viral p24 (MOI 0.4–0.6). Cells were washed, exposed to pre-warmed DMEM and incubated at 37°C in a CO2 incubator for 2, 4, 5 hours. Cells were then fixed with 2% PFA, permeabilized with 0.1% TX-100 and immunostained for CA/p24 using AG3.0 monoclonal antibody. Parallel infections were performed in the presence of 50 mM NH4Cl, with or without 10 μM CsA, for 2 h prior to fixation. To identify intact post-fusion cores, cells were treated with 10 μM CsA for 30 min prior to fixation. When indicated, Nevirapine (10 μM) was added to samples after virus binding. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst-33342 (2 μg/ml) after the fixation step. Images from 4 random fields of view, each containing ~30 cells were collected with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope, and maximum intensity projection images were analyzed. Viral cores co-labeled with IN/CypA and IN/p24 were quantified and plotted as the number of co-labeled cores per cell. The fraction of post-fusion cores was determined by subtracting the number of IN/CypA or p24/CypA colocalized spots after CsA treatment from that in control (untreated) samples for each time point and normalizing to the total number of double-labeled spots detected in the presence of NH4Cl.

CypA-DsRed loss from post-fusion cores in living cells

The CypA-DsRed loss after virus fusion with cells was measured using the VSV-G pseudotyped pR9ΔEnv particles co-labeled with IN-sfGFP and CypA-DsRed. Viruses (10 pg of p24) were bound to 50,000 TZM-bl cells (MOI 0.008) by spinoculation at 1500×g, 4°C for 30 min and imaged at 37°C. To examine loss of the CypA marker at late time points post-infection, 50,000 TZM-bl cells were infected with 500 pg p24 (MOI 0.4) of pseudoviruses, as described above. For fixed cell analyses, coverslip-grown 100,000 TZM-bl cells were infected by spinoculation, as above, with 1–1.5 ng of viral p24 (MOI 0.4–0.6). The cells were washed twice, and virus entry was initiated on a pre-heated CO2-controlled (5% CO2) microscope stage by adding pre-warmed live cell imaging buffer (LCIB, Invitrogen). For live cell experiments, nuclei were stained for 10 min with 2 μg/ml Hoechst-33342 prior to virus binding. CsA (5 μM), BI-2 (20 μM), PF74 (10 μM) or Nevirapine (10 μM) were added to cells decorated with viruses before beginning the image acquisition and maintained throughout the experiment.

Image acquisition and analyses

3D time-lapse live cell imaging was carried out with a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope using a C-Apo 40x/1.2NA water-immersion objective. A suitable field of view was selected, and full cell volume was imaged by acquiring 8–12 Z-stacks spaced by 1 μm every 30 sec, using a minimal power of 405, 488 and 561 nm lasers for Hoechst-33342, sfGFP and DsRed/mRFP/mCherry, respectively. The DefiniteFocus module (Carl Zeiss) was utilized to correct for axial drift. Imaging was done at 37°C using the Zeiss environmental chamber maintained at 5% CO2. Acquired image series were converted to maximum intensity projections and analyzed using the ICY image analysis software (icy.bioimageanalysis.org). The complete loss of CypA signal from IN-sfGFP labeled viral particles was blindly annotated by two trained students.

For measuring the CypA and p24 loss from permeabilized virions in vitro, single-plane images from 4 independent fields of view were acquired over time with a Zeiss LSM780 microscope using 488, 561 and 633 nm lasers for the green (IN-sfGFP), red (CypA-DsRed) and far-red (p24) channels, respectively. When imaging fixed cells, greater laser powers and line averaging, as well as more stringent sampling in axial direction (typically, ~25 Z-stacks spaced by 0.5 μm), were used. Images were analyzed using the spot detection algorithm of the ICY image analysis software, and the average number of IN, CypA and p24 spots per field of view was determined. For in vitro core stability measurements, the average ratios of the number of IN/CypA and IN/p24 spots from 4 fields of view were calculated for the control (fixed and permeabilized), 0 min (permeabilized and immediately fixed), background control (permeabilized, CsA-treated and immediately fixed) and for all time points, as indicated. For each CA mutant, the ratio obtained at 0 min was set to a 100%. At each time point, the ratio obtained for the CsA-treated background control was subtracted. The fraction of cores remaining immediately after TX-100 treatment (0 min) is shown in Fig 2D, where normalization was to the fixed and permeabilized control. Intensity measurements on post-fusion cores at 6-8hrs time points were performed in ImageJ across 3 independent experiments by measuring CypA intensity of single viral puncta at the first time frame and the 80min time frame. Later the percent of CypA-intensity loss in single viral particles were determined for control and nevirapine treated sample in Fig 5G.

Single particle tracking and particle intensity analyses were performed using respective modules available in ICY. Stable cores at the nuclear pore were identified by analyzing the motion of single particles that stayed in the vicinity of the nuclear membrane during the image acquisition. The particle trajectories were corrected for nuclear movement by determining the center of mass for the respective nucleus and tracking its displacement. Two-dimensional diffusion coefficients and MSD were calculated from the particle trajectories using the following equation:

For assessing loss of CypA-DsRed in fixed cells, colocalization of IN-, CypA- and p24-positive puncta was measured using the ICY module. Pairwise colocalization of the three channels within the identified objects was determined. The fraction of post-fusion cores was determined by subtracting the number of IN-sfGFP/CypA-DsRed-labeled particles after CsA treatment from that in untreated control and normalizing to the number of co-labeled puncta in the presence of NH4Cl, which blocks VSV-G mediated viral fusion.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was determined by the Mann-Whitney rank-sum test or the Student t-Test, as indicated. p<0.05 (*) was considered significant; p<0.01 and p<0.001 are denoted as ** and ***, respectively.

References 75

  1. 1.

    Campbell EM, Hope TJ (2015 ) HIV-1 capsid: the multifaceted key player in HIV-1 infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 13: 471–483.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrmicro3503

  2. 2.

    Ambrose Z, Aiken C (2014 ) HIV-1 uncoating: connection to nuclear entry and regulation by host proteins. Virology 454–455: 371–379.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2014.02.004

  3. 3.

    Fassati A (2012 ) Multiple roles of the capsid protein in the early steps of HIV-1 infection. Virus Res.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virusres.2012.09.012

  4. 4.

    Arhel N, Kirchhoff F (2010 ) Host proteins involved in HIV infection: new therapeutic targets. Biochim Biophys Acta 1802: 313–321.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.12.003

  5. 5.

    Forshey BM, von Schwedler U, Sundquist WI, Aiken C (2002 ) Formation of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 core of optimal stability is crucial for viral replication. J Virol 76: 5667–5677.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.76.11.5667-5677.2002

  6. 6.

    Stremlau M, Perron M, Lee M, Li Y, Song B, et al (2006 ) Specific recognition and accelerated uncoating of retroviral capsids by the TRIM5alpha restriction factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 5514–5519.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0509996103

  7. 7.
  8. 8.

    Hulme AE, Perez O, Hope TJ (2011 ) Complementary assays reveal a relationship between HIV-1 uncoating and reverse transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 9975–9980.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1014522108

  9. 9.

    Yang Y, Fricke T, Diaz-Griffero F (2013 ) Inhibition of reverse transcriptase activity increases stability of the HIV-1 core. J Virol 87: 683–687.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01228-12

  10. 10.

    Albanese A, Arosio D, Terreni M, Cereseto A (2008 ) HIV-1 pre-integration complexes selectively target decondensed chromatin in the nuclear periphery. PLoS One 3: e2413

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0002413

  11. 11.

    Francis AC, Di Primio C, Quercioli V, Valentini P, Boll A, et al (2014 ) Second generation imaging of nuclear/cytoplasmic HIV-1 complexes. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 30: 717–726.

    Not in our library10.1089/aid.2013.0277

  12. 12.
  13. 13.

    Hubner W, Chen P, Del Portillo A, Liu Y, Gordon RE, et al (2007 ) Sequence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag localization and oligomerization monitored with live confocal imaging of a replication-competent, fluorescently tagged HIV-1. J Virol 81: 12596–12607.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01088-07

  14. 14.

    Yu Z, Dobro MJ, Woodward CL, Levandovsky A, Danielson CM, et al (2013 ) Unclosed HIV-1 capsids suggest a curled sheet model of assembly. J Mol Biol 425: 112–123.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmb.2012.10.006

  15. 15.

    Mamede JI, Hope TJ (2016 ) Detection and Tracking of Dual-Labeled HIV Particles Using Wide-Field Live Cell Imaging to Follow Viral Core Integrity. Methods Mol Biol 1354: 49–59.

    Not in our library10.1007/978-1-4939-3046-3_4

  16. 16.

    Campbell EM, Perez O, Anderson JL, Hope TJ (2008 ) Visualization of a proteasome-independent intermediate during restriction of HIV-1 by rhesus TRIM5alpha. J Cell Biol 180: 549–561.

    Not in our library10.1083/jcb.200706154

  17. 17.

    Colgan J, Yuan HE, Franke EK, Luban J (1996 ) Binding of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag polyprotein to cyclophilin A is mediated by the central region of capsid and requires Gag dimerization. J Virol 70: 4299–4310.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.70.7.4299-4310.1996

  18. 18.

    Braaten D, Ansari H, Luban J (1997 ) The hydrophobic pocket of cyclophilin is the binding site for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag polyprotein. J Virol 71: 2107–2113.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.71.3.2107-2113.1997

  19. 19.

    Franke EK, Yuan HE, Luban J (1994 ) Specific incorporation of cyclophilin A into HIV-1 virions. Nature 372: 359–362.

    Not in our library10.1038/372359a0

  20. 20.

    Campbell EM, Perez O, Melar M, Hope TJ (2007 ) Labeling HIV-1 virions with two fluorescent proteins allows identification of virions that have productively entered the target cell. Virology 360: 286–293.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2006.10.025

  21. 21.

    Campbell RE, Tour O, Palmer AE, Steinbach PA, Baird GS, et al (2002 ) A monomeric red fluorescent protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 7877–7882.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.082243699

  22. 22.
  23. 23.

    Yoo S, Myszka DG, Yeh C, McMurray M, Hill CP, et al (1997 ) Molecular recognition in the HIV-1 capsid/cyclophilin A complex. J Mol Biol 269: 780–795.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmbi.1997.1051

  24. 24.

    Price AJ, Marzetta F, Lammers M, Ylinen LM, Schaller T, et al (2009 ) Active site remodeling switches HIV specificity of antiretroviral TRIMCyp. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 1036–1042.

    Not in our library10.1038/nsmb.1667

  25. 25.

    Javanbakht H, Diaz-Griffero F, Yuan W, Yeung DF, Li X, et al (2007 ) The ability of multimerized cyclophilin A to restrict retrovirus infection. Virology 367: 19–29.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2007.04.034

  26. 26.
  27. 27.

    Francis G, Kerem Z, Makkar HP, Becker K (2002 ) The biological action of saponins in animal systems: a review. Br J Nutr 88: 587–605.

    Not in our library10.1079/bjn2002725

  28. 28.

    Handschumacher RE, Harding MW, Rice J, Drugge RJ, Speicher DW (1984 ) Cyclophilin: a specific cytosolic binding protein for cyclosporin A. Science 226: 544–547.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.6238408

  29. 29.

    Thali M, Bukovsky A, Kondo E, Rosenwirth B, Walsh CT, et al (1994 ) Functional association of cyclophilin A with HIV-1 virions. Nature 372: 363–365.

    Not in our library10.1038/372363a0

  30. 30.

    Sokolskaja E, Sayah DM, Luban J (2004 ) Target cell cyclophilin A modulates human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infectivity. J Virol 78: 12800–12808.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.78.23.12800-12808.2004

  31. 31.

    Hatziioannou T, Perez-Caballero D, Cowan S, Bieniasz PD (2005 ) Cyclophilin interactions with incoming human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsids with opposing effects on infectivity in human cells. J Virol 79: 176–183.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.1.176-183.2005

  32. 32.

    Sayah DM, Sokolskaja E, Berthoux L, Luban J (2004 ) Cyclophilin A retrotransposition into TRIM5 explains owl monkey resistance to HIV-1. Nature 430: 569–573.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02777

  33. 33.

    Fricke T, Brandariz-Nunez A, Wang X, Smith AB 3rd, Diaz-Griffero F (2013 ) Human cytosolic extracts stabilize the HIV-1 core. J Virol 87: 10587–10597.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01705-13

  34. 34.

    Guth CA, Sodroski J (2014 ) Contribution of PDZD8 to stabilization of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid. J Virol 88: 4612–4623.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02945-13

  35. 35.

    Lukic Z, Dharan A, Fricke T, Diaz-Griffero F, Campbell EM (2014 ) HIV-1 Uncoating Is Facilitated by Dynein and Kinesin 1. J Virol 88: 13613–13625.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.02219-14

  36. 36.

    Pawlica P, Berthoux L (2014 ) Cytoplasmic dynein promotes HIV-1 uncoating. Viruses 6: 4195–4211.

    Not in our library10.3390/v6114195

  37. 37.

    Pawlica P, Le Sage V, Poccardi N, Tremblay MJ, Mouland AJ, et al (2014 ) Functional evidence for the involvement of microtubules and dynein motor complexes in TRIM5alpha-mediated restriction of retroviruses. J Virol 88: 5661–5676.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03717-13

  38. 38.

    Hulme AE, Kelley Z, Foley D, Hope TJ (2015 ) Complementary assays reveal a low level of CA associated with nuclear HIV-1 viral complexes. J Virol.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00476-15

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Shi J, Zhou J, Shah VB, Aiken C, Whitby K (2011 ) Small-molecule inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by virus capsid destabilization. J Virol 85: 542–549.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.01406-10

  41. 41.

    Lamorte L, Titolo S, Lemke CT, Goudreau N, Mercier JF, et al (2013 ) Discovery of novel small-molecule HIV-1 replication inhibitors that stabilize capsid complexes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 4622–4631.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.00985-13

  42. 42.
  43. 43.

    Bhattacharya A, Alam SL, Fricke T, Zadrozny K, Sedzicki J, et al (2014 ) Structural basis of HIV-1 capsid recognition by PF74 and CPSF6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 18625–18630.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1419945112

  44. 44.

    Saito A, Ferhadian D, Sowd GA, Serrao E, Shi J, et al (2016 ) Roles of capsid-interacting host factors in multimodal inhibition of HIV-1 by PF74. J Virol.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03116-15

  45. 45.

    Hulme AE, Kelley Z, Okocha EA, Hope TJ (2015 ) Identification of capsid mutations that alter the rate of HIV-1 uncoating in infected cells. J Virol 89: 643–651.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.03043-14

  46. 46.

    Xu H, Franks T, Gibson G, Huber K, Rahm N, et al (2013 ) Evidence for biphasic uncoating during HIV-1 infection from a novel imaging assay. Retrovirology 10: 70

    Not in our library10.1186/1742-4690-10-70

  47. 47.

    Arfi V, Lienard J, Nguyen XN, Berger G, Rigal D, et al (2009 ) Characterization of the behavior of functional viral genomes during the early steps of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol 83: 7524–7535.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00429-09

  48. 48.

    Grobler JA, Dornadula G, Rice MR, Simcoe AL, Hazuda DJ, et al (2007 ) HIV-1 reverse transcriptase plus-strand initiation exhibits preferential sensitivity to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in vitro. J Biol Chem 282: 8005–8010.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.m608274200

  49. 49.

    Julias JG, Ferris AL, Boyer PL, Hughes SH (2001 ) Replication of phenotypically mixed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions containing catalytically active and catalytically inactive reverse transcriptase. J Virol 75: 6537–6546.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.75.14.6537-6546.2001

  50. 50.

    Julias JG, McWilliams MJ, Sarafianos SG, Arnold E, Hughes SH (2002 ) Mutations in the RNase H domain of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase affect the initiation of DNA synthesis and the specificity of RNase H cleavage in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 9515–9520.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.142123199

  51. 51.

    Smith CM, Smith JS, Roth MJ (1999 ) RNase H requirements for the second strand transfer reaction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcription. J Virol 73: 6573–6581.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.73.8.6573-6581.1999

  52. 52.

    Zhou J, Price AJ, Halambage UD, James LC, Aiken C (2015 ) HIV-1 Resistance to the Capsid-Targeting Inhibitor PF74 Results in Altered Dependence on Host Factors Required for Virus Nuclear Entry. J Virol 89: 9068–9079.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00340-15

  53. 53.

    Endrich MM, Gehrig P, Gehring H (1999 ) Maturation-induced conformational changes of HIV-1 capsid protein and identification of two high affinity sites for cyclophilins in the C-terminal domain. J Biol Chem 274: 5326–5332.

    Not in our library10.1074/jbc.274.9.5326

  54. 54.

    Shah VB, Shi J, Hout DR, Oztop I, Krishnan L, et al (2013 ) The host proteins transportin SR2/TNPO3 and cyclophilin A exert opposing effects on HIV-1 uncoating. J Virol 87: 422–432.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.07177-11

  55. 55.
  56. 56.

    Berthoux L, Sebastian S, Sokolskaja E, Luban J (2005 ) Cyclophilin A is required for TRIM5{alpha}-mediated resistance to HIV-1 in Old World monkey cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 14849–14853.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0505659102

  57. 57.

    Rasaiyaah J, Tan CP, Fletcher AJ, Price AJ, Blondeau C, et al (2013 ) HIV-1 evades innate immune recognition through specific cofactor recruitment. Nature 503: 402–405.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature12769

  58. 58.

    De Iaco A, Luban J (2014 ) Cyclophilin A promotes HIV-1 reverse transcription but its effect on transduction correlates best with its effect on nuclear entry of viral cDNA. Retrovirology 11: 11

    Not in our library10.1186/1742-4690-11-11

  59. 59.

    Dismuke DJ, Aiken C (2006 ) Evidence for a functional link between uncoating of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 core and nuclear import of the viral preintegration complex. J Virol 80: 3712–3720.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.80.8.3712-3720.2006

  60. 60.

    Li Y, Kar AK, Sodroski J (2009 ) Target cell type-dependent modulation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid disassembly by cyclophilin A. J Virol 83: 10951–10962.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.00682-09

  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.
  64. 64.

    Lelek M, Di Nunzio F, Henriques R, Charneau P, Arhel N, et al (2012 ) Superresolution imaging of HIV in infected cells with FlAsH-PALM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 8564–8569.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1013267109

  65. 65.

    Di Nunzio F, Fricke T, Miccio A, Valle-Casuso JC, Perez P, et al (2013 ) Nup153 and Nup98 bind the HIV-1 core and contribute to the early steps of HIV-1 replication. Virology 440: 8–18.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.virol.2013.02.008

  66. 66.

    Fassati A, Goff SP (2001 ) Characterization of intracellular reverse transcription complexes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 75: 3626–3635.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.75.8.3626-3635.2001

  67. 67.

    Perez-Caballero D, Hatziioannou T, Zhang F, Cowan S, Bieniasz PD (2005 ) Restriction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by TRIM-CypA occurs with rapid kinetics and independently of cytoplasmic bodies, ubiquitin, and proteasome activity. J Virol 79: 15567–15572.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.79.24.15567-15572.2005

  68. 68.

    Desai TM, Marin M, Sood C, Shi J, Nawaz F, et al (2015 ) Fluorescent protein-tagged Vpr dissociates from HIV-1 core after viral fusion and rapidly enters the cell nucleus. Retrovirology 12: 88

    Not in our library10.1186/s12977-015-0215-z

  69. 69.

    Tobiume M, Lineberger JE, Lundquist CA, Miller MD, Aiken C (2003 ) Nef does not affect the efficiency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 fusion with target cells. J Virol 77: 10645–10650.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.77.19.10645-10650.2003

  70. 70.

    Wei X, Decker JM, Liu H, Zhang Z, Arani RB, et al (2002 ) Emergence of resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in patients receiving fusion inhibitor (T-20) monotherapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46: 1896–1905.

    Not in our library10.1128/aac.46.6.1896-1905.2002

  71. 71.

    Braaten D, Luban J (2001 ) Cyclophilin A regulates HIV-1 infectivity, as demonstrated by gene targeting in human T cells. EMBO J 20: 1300–1309.

    Not in our library10.1093/emboj/20.6.1300

  72. 72.

    Simm M, Shahabuddin M, Chao W, Allan JS, Volsky DJ (1995 ) Aberrant Gag protein composition of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vif mutant produced in primary lymphocytes. J Virol 69: 4582–4586.

    Not in our library10.1128/jvi.69.7.4582-4586.1995

  73. 73.

    Padilla-Parra S, Marin M, Gahlaut N, Suter R, Kondo N, et al (2013 ) Fusion of Mature HIV-1 Particles Leads to Complete Release of a Gag-GFP-Based Content Marker and Raises the Intraviral pH. PLoS ONE 8: e71002

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0071002

  74. 74.

    Pizzato M, Erlwein O, Bonsall D, Kaye S, Muir D, et al (2009 ) A one-step SYBR Green I-based product-enhanced reverse transcriptase assay for the quantitation of retroviruses in cell culture supernatants. J Virol Methods 156: 1–7.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jviromet.2008.10.012

  75. 75.

    Miyauchi K, Kim Y, Latinovic O, Morozov V, Melikyan GB (2009 ) HIV enters cells via endocytosis and dynamin-dependent fusion with endosomes. Cell 137: 433–444.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.046

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.