Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Different structural variant prediction tools yield considerably different results in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Kyle Lesack, Grace M Mariene, Erik C Andersen and 1 more

PLoS ONE · 2022

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278424 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

The accurate characterization of structural variation is crucial for our understanding of how large chromosomal alterations affect phenotypic differences and contribute to genome evolution. Whole-genome sequencing is a popular approach for identifying structural variants, but the accuracy of popular tools remains unclear due to the limitations of existing benchmarks. Moreover, the performance of these tools for predicting variants in non-human genomes is less certain, as most tools were developed and benchmarked using data from the human genome. To evaluate the use of long-read data for the validation of short-read structural variant calls, the agreement between predictions from a short-read ensemble learning method and long-read tools were compared using real and simulated data from Caenorhabditis elegans. The results obtained from simulated data indicate that the best performing tool is contingent on the type and size of the variant, as well as the sequencing depth of coverage. These results also highlight the need for reference datasets generated from real data that can be used as 'ground truth' in benchmarks.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References61

  1. 3.
  2. 4.
  3. 14.
  4. 15.
  5. 19.
  6. 23.
  7. 29.
  8. 33.
  9. 35.
  10. 38.

30 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 61 references

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.