Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

General rather than specific: Cognitive deficits in suppressing task irrelevant stimuli are associated with buying-shopping disorder.

Nico Lindheimer, Jennifer Nicolai, Morten Moshagen

PLoS ONE · 2020

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237093 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate associations between buying-shopping disorder (BSD) propensity and the performance in the Stroop Matching Task. This task measures stimulus interference, one specific component of behavioral impulsivity, using neutral (i.e. not buying related) stimuli. Deficits thus mirror a general rather than a specific deficit to resist task-irrelevant stimuli.<h4>Method</h4>222 participants completed the Stroop Matching Task, the Pathological Buying Screener, and various questionnaires assessing clinical background variables as well as trait-impulsivity.<h4>Results</h4>Correlation analyses showed that BSD propensity was associated with poorer performance in the Stroop Matching Task. Multiple regression analyses controlling for related disorders and trait-impulsivity indicated that BSD was the only significant predictor.<h4>Conclusion</h4>These findings indicate that BSD propensity is associated with deficits in the stimulus interference component of behavioral impulsivity, mirroring a general cognitive deficit. Since no other disorder significantly predicted the performance in the Stroop Matching Task, this deficit seems to be unique for BSD.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.