Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The impact of position-orientation adaptive smoothing in diffusion weighted imaging-From diffusion metrics to fiber tractography.

Jia Yang, Barbara Carl, Christopher Nimsky and 1 more

PLoS ONE · 2020

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233474 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

In contrast to commonly used approaches to improve data quality in diffusion weighted imaging, position-orientation adaptive smoothing (POAS) provides an edge-preserving post-processing approach. This study aims to investigate its potential and effects on image quality, diffusion metrics, and fiber tractography of the corticospinal tract in relation to non-post-processed and averaged data. 22 healthy volunteers were included in this study. For each volunteer five clinically applicable diffusion weighted imaging data sets were acquired and post-processed by standard averaging and POAS. POAS post-processing led to significantly higher signal-to-noise-ratios (p < 0.001), lower fractional anisotropy across the whole brain (p < 0.05) and reduced intra-subject variability of diffusion weighted imaging signal intensity and fractional anisotropy (p < 0.001, p = 0.006). Fiber tractography of the corticospinal tract resulted in significantly (p = 0.027, p = 0.014) larger tract volumes while fiber density was the lowest. Similarity across tractography results was highest for POAS post-processed data (p < 0.001). POAS post-processing enhances image quality, decreases the intra-subject variability of signal intensity and fractional anisotropy, increases fiber tract volume of the corticospinal tract, and leads to higher reproducibility of tractography results. Thus, POAS post-processing supports a reliable and more accurate fiber tractography of the corticospinal tract, being mandatory for the clinical use.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.