Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and standardized academic tests: Reliability across respondent type and age.

Maria Keilow, Hans Henrik Sievertsen, Janni Niclasen and 1 more

PLoS ONE · 2019

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220193 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

Exploiting nation-wide data from the Danish National Birth Cohort, we show that children's emotional and behavioral problems measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) are closely related to their performance in standardized academic tests for reading and mathematics in sixth grade. The relationship is remarkably linear across the entire distribution for both the total difficulties score and subscale scores of the SDQ; higher scores on the SDQ (more problems) are related to worse performance in academic tests. We assess the similarity across respondent type; parent (child age 7 and 11), teacher (child age 11) and self-reported scores (child age 11), and find that teacher and parent reported scores have very similar slopes in the SDQ-test score relationship, while the child reported SDQ in relation to the academic test performance has a flatter slope.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References26

  1. 5.

25 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.