Theoretical research without projects.
Miguel Navascués, Costantino Budroni
PLoS ONE · 2019
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214026 (opens in a new tab)
We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.
Abstract
We propose a funding scheme for theoretical research that does not rely on project proposals, but on recent past scientific productivity. Given a quantitative figure of merit on the latter and the total research budget, we introduce a number of policies to decide the allocation of funds in each grant call. Under some assumptions on scientific productivity, some of such policies are shown to converge, in the limit of many grant calls, to a funding configuration that is close to the maximum total productivity of the whole scientific community. We present numerical simulations showing evidence that these schemes would also perform well in the presence of statistical noise in the scientific productivity and/or its evaluation. Finally, we prove that one of our policies cannot be cheated by individual research units. Our work must be understood as a first step towards a mathematical theory of the research activity.
Abstract licence: CC BY
References44
- 17.Corrected
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? · 2013
39 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.
All 44 referencesReads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.