Skip to content
naulon
Get started

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 18, 2026.

Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences

Kevin Anderson, Oksana Burford, Lynne Emmerton

PLOS ONE · 2016 · CC BY

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156164

Abstract

Objective. Consumers are living longer, creating more pressure on the health system and increasing their requirement for self-care of chronic conditions. Despite rapidly-increasing numbers of mobile health applications (‘apps’) for consumers’ self-care, there is a paucity of research into consumer engagement with electronic self-monitoring. This paper presents a qualitative exploration of how health consumers use apps for health monitoring, their perceived benefits from use of health apps, and suggestions for improvement of health apps.

Materials and Methods. ‘Health app’ was defined as any commercially-available health or fitness app with capacity for self-monitoring. English-speaking consumers aged 18 years and older using any health app for self-monitoring were recruited for interview from the metropolitan area of Perth, Australia. The semi-structured interview guide comprised questions based on the Technology Acceptance Model, Health Information Technology Acceptance Model, and the Mobile Application Rating Scale, and is the only study to do so. These models also facilitated deductive thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Implicit and explicit responses not aligned to these models were analyzed inductively.

Results. Twenty-two consumers (15 female, seven male) participated, 13 of whom were aged 26–35 years. Eighteen participants reported on apps used on iPhones. Apps were used to monitor diabetes, asthma, depression, celiac disease, blood pressure, chronic migraine, pain management, menstrual cycle irregularity, and fitness. Most were used approximately weekly for several minutes per session, and prior to meeting initial milestones, with significantly decreased usage thereafter. Deductive and inductive thematic analysis reduced the data to four dominant themes: engagement in use of the app; technical functionality of the app; ease of use and design features; and management of consumers’ data.

Conclusions. The semi-structured interviews provided insight into usage, benefits and challenges of health monitoring using apps. Understanding the range of consumer experiences and expectations can inform design of health apps to encourage persistence in self-monitoring.

References 69

  1. 1.

    Wiederhold BK, Riva G, Graffigna G. Ensuring the best care for our increasing aging population: health engagement and positive technology can help patients achieve a more active role in future healthcare. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013;16(6):411–12.

    Not in our library10.1089/cyber.2013.1520

  2. 2.

    Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW Jr, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(1):5–14.

    Not in our library10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003

  3. 3.

    Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Rep. 2004;119(3):239

    Not in our library10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.002

  4. 4.

    Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ, Hilton L, et al Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(6):427–38.

    Not in our library10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007

  5. 5.

    Williams MV, Baker DW, Honig EG, Lee TM, Nowlan A. Inadequate literacy is a barrier to asthma knowledge and self-care. Chest. 1998;114(4):1008–15..

    Not in our library10.1378/chest.114.4.1008

  6. 6.

    Baker DW, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Scott T, Parker RM, Green D, et al Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(8):1278–83..

    Not in our library10.2105/ajph.92.8.1278

  7. 7.

    Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS. Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(12):791–8..

    Not in our library10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00242.x

  8. 8.

    Williams MV, Parker RM, Baker DW, Parikh NS, Pitkin K, Coates WC, et al Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals. JAMA. 1995;274(21):1677–82..

    Not in our library

  9. 9.

    Gill PS, Kamath A, Gill TS. Distraction: an assessment of smartphone usage in health care work settings. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2012;5(1):105–14.

    Not in our library10.2147/rmhp.s34813

  10. 10.

    Dumas RA. Health App completely buggy? [Internet]. c2014. Available: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/6680914. Accessed 2 November 2015.

    Not in our library

  11. 11.

    Thomas O. Apple's health app is an embarrassment [Internet]. c2014. Available: http://readwrite.com/2014/10/02/apple-health-app. Accessed 2 November 2015.

    Not in our library

  12. 12.

    Finkelstein EA, Chay J, Bajpai S. The economic burden of self-reported and undiagnosed cardiovascular diseases and diabetes on Indonesian households. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(6):e99572

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0099572

  13. 13.

    Miller KM, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Goland RS, Haller MJ, McGill JB, et al Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):2009–14..

    Not in our library10.2337/dc12-1770

  14. 14.

    Host T, Person C, Lewis P. Health Market Validation Program (Health MVP) call for proposal application form for SMEs. [Internet]. c2014. Available: http://www.business.vic.gov.au/grants-and-assistance/programs/health-market-validation-program. Accessed 20 February 2015.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Blödt S, Pach D, Roll S, Witt CM. Effectiveness of app-based relaxation for patients with chronic low back pain (RelaxBack) and chronic neck pain (RelaxNeck): study protocol for two randomized pragmatic trials. Trials. 2014;15(1):490–99.

    Not in our library10.1186/1745-6215-15-490

  16. 16.

    Nilges P, Köster B, Schmidt CO. Pain acceptance—concept and validation of a German version of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. Schmerz. 2007;21(1):57–8.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00482-006-0508-1

  17. 17.
    Understanding Usage of a Hybrid Website and Smartphone App for Weight Management: A Mixed-Methods Study · 2014
    Not checked
  18. 18.

    Cooper S, Foster K, Naughton F, Leonardi-Bee J, Sutton S, Ussher M, et al Pilot study to evaluate a tailored text message intervention for pregnant smokers (MiQuit): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):s13063-014-0546-4.; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4318454.

    Not in our library10.1186/s13063-014-0546-4

  19. 19.

    Haug S, Castro RP, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Fleisch E, Schaub MP. Efficacy of an Internet and SMS-based integrated smoking cessation and alcohol intervention for smoking cessation in young people: study protocol of a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1140–48.; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4228117.

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-14-1140

  20. 20.
    Impact of a mobile phone and web program on symptom and functional outcomes for people with mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress: a randomised controlled trial · 2013
    No notice
  21. 21.

    Eyles H, McLean R, Neal B, Doughty R, Jiang Y, Mhurchu C. Using mobile technology to support lower-salt food choices for people with cardiovascular disease: protocol for the SaltSwitch randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):950–8..

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2458-14-950

  22. 22.

    Hasford J, Uricher J, Tauscher M, Bramlage P, Virchow JC. Persistence with asthma treatment is low in Germany especially for controller medication—a population based study of 483051 patients. Allergy. 2010;65(3):347–54.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02161.x

  23. 23.

    Zichermann G. Gamification by design: implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Cunningham C, editor. Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media; 2011.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Pandey A, Hasan S, Dubey D, Sarangi S. Smartphone apps as a source of cancer information: changing trends in health information-seeking behavior. J Cancer Educ. 2013;28(1):138–42.

    Not in our library10.1007/s13187-012-0446-9

  25. 25.
    Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey · 2015
    No notice
  26. 26.

    Licskai CJ, Sands T, Ferrone M. Development and pilot testing of a mobile health solution for asthma self-management: Asthma action plan smartphone application pilot study. Can Respir J. 2013;20(4):301–6.

    Not in our library10.1155/2013/906710

  27. 27.

    Ryan D, Price D, Musgrave SD, Malhotra S, Lee AJ, Ayansina D, et al Clinical and cost effectiveness of mobile phone supported self monitoring of asthma: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;296(6614):e1756

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.e1756

  28. 28.

    Liu WT, Huang CD, Wang CH, Lee KY, Lin SM, Kuo HP. A mobile telephone-based interactive self-care system improves asthma control. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(2):310–7..

    Not in our library10.1183/09031936.00000810

  29. 29.
    Diabetes Self-Management Smartphone Application for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial · 2013
    No notice
  30. 30.

    Jeon E, Park H. Development of a smartphone application for clinical-guideline-based obesity management. Healthc Inform Res. 2015;21(1):10–20.

    Not in our library10.4258/hir.2015.21.1.10

  31. 31.

    McCarroll ML, Armbruster S, Pohle-Krauza RJ, Lyzen AM, Min S, Nash DW, et al Feasibility of a lifestyle intervention for overweight/obese endometrial and breast cancer survivors using an interactive mobile application. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;137(3):508–15. WOS:000355779000025.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.025

  32. 32.

    Pan D, Dhall R, Lieberman A, Petitti DB. A mobile cloud-based parkinson’s disease assessment system for home-based monitoring. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2015;3(1).

    Not in our library10.2196/mhealth.3956

  33. 33.

    Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. 1989;13(3):319–40.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Madden TJ, Ellen PS, Ajzen I. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1992;18(1):3–9. WOS:A1992HC29000001.

    Not in our library10.1177/0146167292181001

  35. 35.

    Fishbein M, Ajzen I, Albarracin D, Hornik RC. Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2007.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Yarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(6):650–52.

    Not in our library10.1177/1077558707305942

  37. 37.

    Briz-Ponce L, García-Peñalvo F. An empirical assessment of a technology acceptance model for apps in medical education. J Med Syst. 2015;39(11):1–5.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10916-015-0352-x

  38. 38.

    Cho J, Quinlan MM, Park D, Noh GY. Determinants of adoption of smartphone health apps among college students. Am J Health Behav. 2014;38(6):860–70. Epub 2014/09/11..

    Not in our library10.5993/ajhb.38.6.8

  39. 39.
    Development of a Health Information Technology Acceptance Model Using Consumers’ Health Behavior Intention · 2012
    No notice
  40. 40.

    Janz N, Becker M. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Behav. 1984;11(1):1–47.

    Not in our library10.1177/109019818401100101

All 69 references

Cited by papers we hold 7

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.