Contact Patterns in a High School: A Comparison between Data Collected Using Wearable Sensors, Contact Diaries and Friendship Surveys

Abstract

Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how information or transmissible diseases propagate in a population, interactions between individuals are the subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are commonly used, ranging from diaries and surveys to decentralised infrastructures based on wearable sensors. These methods have each advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. Moreover, as surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases than contact diaries, it is interesting to explore how actual contact patterns occurring in day-to-day life compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data collected in a French high school and concerning (i) face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, namely wearable sensors and contact diaries, (ii) self-reported friendship surveys, and (iii) online social links. We compare the resulting data sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long contacts have a large reporting probability, and that the durations of contacts tend to be overestimated in the diaries. Moreover, measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship can have durations of any length but all long contacts do correspond to a reported friendship. On the contrary, online links that are not also reported in the friendship survey correspond to short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the difference of nature between reported friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer moreover from a low sampling rate, as many students did not fill them, showing that the sensor-based platform had a higher acceptability. We also show that, despite the biases of diaries and surveys, the overall structure of the contact network, as quantified by the mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both networks of self-reported contacts and of friendships, and we investigate the correlations between the number of neighbors of individuals in the three networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a correct picture of the global structural organization of the contact network, albeit with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact network corresponding to the strongest links, i.e., the contacts of longest cumulative durations.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 47

1. 1.

   Read JM, Edmunds WJ, Riley S, Lessler J, Cummings DAT (2012 ). Close encounters of the infectious kind: methods to measure social mixing behaviour. Epidemiology and Infection, 140:2117–2130.

   Not in our library10.1017/s0950268812000842 (opens in a new tab)

2. 2.

   Bernard H, Fischer R, Mikolajczyk RT, Kretzschmar M, Wildner M (2009 ) Nurses’ Contacts and Potential for Infectious Disease Transmission. Emerg Infect Dis 15(9):1438–1444.

   Not in our library10.3201/eid1509.081475 (opens in a new tab)

3. 3.

   Edmunds WJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Nokes DJ (1997 ) Who mixes with whom? A method to determine the contact patterns of adults that may lead to the spread of airborne infections. Proc Biol Sci 264:949–57.

   Not in our library10.1098/rspb.1997.0131 (opens in a new tab)

4. 4.

   Read JM, Eames KT, Edmunds WJ (2008 ) Dynamic social networks and the implications for the spread of infectious disease. J R Soc Interface 5:1001

   Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2008.0013 (opens in a new tab)

5. 5.
   Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases · 2008

   No notice
6. 6.

   Mikolajczyk RT, Akmatov MK, Rastin S, Kretzschmar M (2008 ) Social contacts of school children and the transmission of respiratory-spread pathogens. Epidemiol Infect 136(6): 813–822.

   Not in our library10.1017/s0950268807009181 (opens in a new tab)

7. 7.

   Danon L, House TA, Read JM, Keeling MJ (2012 ) Social encounter networks: collective properties and disease transmission. J. R. Soc. Interface 9:2826–2833.

   Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2012.0357 (opens in a new tab)

8. 8.

   Danon L, Read JM, House TA, Vernon MC, Keeling MJ (2013 ) Social encounter networks: characterizing Great Britain. Proc R Soc B 280: 20131037

   Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2013.1037 (opens in a new tab)

9. 9.

   Conlan AJ, Eames KT, Gage JA, von Kirchbach JC, Ross JV, Saenz RA, et al (2011 ) Measuring social networks in British primary schools through scientific engagement. Proc Biol Sci 278:1467

   Not in our library10.1098/rspb.2010.1807 (opens in a new tab)

10. 10.

    Smieszek T, Burri EU, Scherzinger R, Scholz RW (2012 ) Collecting close-contact social mixing data with contact diaries: reporting errors and biases. Epidemiol Infect 140: 744–752.

    Not in our library10.1017/s0950268811001130 (opens in a new tab)

11. 11.

    Smieszek T, Barclay V C, Seeni I, Rainey JJ, Gao H, Uzicanin A, et al (2014 ) How should social mixing be measured? Comparing web-based survey and sensor-based methods. BMC Infectious Diseases 14:136

    Not in our library10.1186/1471-2334-14-136 (opens in a new tab)

12. 12.

    Eubank S, Guclu H, Kumar VSA, Marathe MV, Srinivasan A, Toroczkai Z, et al (2004 ) Modelling disease outbreaks in realistic urban social networks. Nature 429, 180–184.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature02541 (opens in a new tab)

13. 13.

    Iozzi F, Trusiano F, Chinazzi M, Billari FC, Zagheni E, Merler S, et al (2010 ) Little Italy: An Agent-Based Approach to the Estimation of Contact Patterns- Fitting Predicted Matrices to Serological Data. PLoS Comput Biol 6(12): e1001021

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001021 (opens in a new tab)

14. 14.
    Inferring the Structure of Social Contacts from Demographic Data in the Analysis of Infectious Diseases Spread · 2012

    No notice
15. 15.

    Hui P, Chaintreau A, Scott J, Gass R, Crowcroft J, Diot C (2005) Pocket switched networks and human mobility in conference environments. pp. 244–251. Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    O’Neill E, Kostakos V, Kindberg T, Fatah gen. Schieck A, Penn A, Stanton Fraser D, et al (2006 ) Instrumenting the city: developing methods for observing and understanding the digital cityscape. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4206: 315–322.

    Not in our library10.1007/11853565_19 (opens in a new tab)

17. 17.

    Pentland A (2008 ) Honest signals: how they shape our world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Salathé M, Kazandjieva M, Lee J W, Levis P, Feldman M W, Jones J H (2010 ) A high-resolution human contact network for infectious disease transmission. PNAS 107 (51) 22020–22025.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1009094108 (opens in a new tab)

19. 19.

    Hashemian M, Stanley K, Osgood N: Flunet: Automated tracking of contacts during flu season: Proceedings of the 6th International workshop on Wireless Network Measurements: 1–3 June 2010; Avignon 2010, 557–562.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    SocioPatterns website. Available: http://www.sociopatterns.org/ Accessed 2015 July 13.

    Not in our library

21. 21.
    Dynamics of Person-to-Person Interactions from Distributed RFID Sensor Networks · 2010

    No notice
22. 22.

    Isella L, Stehlé J, Barrat A, Cattuto C, Pinton JF, Van den Broeck W (2011 ) What’s in a crowd? Analysis of face-to-face behavioral networks. J. Theor. Biol. 271: 166–180.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.11.033 (opens in a new tab)

23. 23.

    Hornbeck T, Naylor D, Segre AM, Thomas G, Herman T, Polgreen PM (2012 ) Using Sensor Networks to Study the Effect of Peripatetic Healthcare Workers on the Spread of Hospital-Associated Infections. J Infect Dis 206:1549

    Not in our library10.1093/infdis/jis542 (opens in a new tab)

24. 24.

    Fournet J, Barrat A (2014 ) Contact Patterns among High School Students. PLOS ONE 9: e107878

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0107878 (opens in a new tab)

25. 25.
    Measuring Large-Scale Social Networks with High Resolution · 2014

    No notice
26. 26.

    Obadia T, Silhol R, Opatowski L, Temime L, Legrand J, Thiébaut ACM, et al (2015 ) Detailed Contact Data and the Dissemination of Staphylococcus aureus in Hospitals. PLoS Comput Biol 11(3): e1004170

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004170 (opens in a new tab)

27. 27.

    Toth DJA, Leecaster M, Pettey WBP, Gundlapalli AV, Gao H, Rainey JJ, et al (2015 ) The role of heterogeneity in contact timing and duration in network models of influenza spread in schools. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12:20150279

    Not in our library10.1098/rsif.2015.0279 (opens in a new tab)

28. 28.

    Van Kerckhove K, Hens N, Edmunds WJ, Eames KTD (2013 ) The Impact of Illness on Social Networks: Implications for Transmission and Control of Influenza. Am J Epidemiol 178:1655–1662.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwt196 (opens in a new tab)

29. 29.

    Paulhus DL, Vazire S (2007) The self-report method. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology: 224–239.

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Bernard HR, Killworth P, Kronenfeld D, Sailer L (1984) The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual review of anthropology: 495–517.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Collopy F (1996 ) Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: an empirical study of computer users. Management Science 42.5: 758–767.

    Not in our library10.1287/mnsc.42.5.758 (opens in a new tab)

32. 32.

    Génois M, Vestergaard C, Cattuto C, Barrat A (2015) Compensating for population sampling in simulations of epidemic spread on temporal contact networks. arXiv:1503.04066.

    Not in our library10.1038/ncomms9860 (opens in a new tab)

33. 33.

    Moreno JL (1953 ) Who shall survive? Foundations of sociometry, group psychotherapy and socio-drama, Oxford, England: Beacon House.

    Not in our library

34. 34.

    Lazer D, Pentland A, Adamic A, Aral S, Barabási A-L, Brewer D, et al (2009 ) Life in the network: the coming age of computational social science. Science 323: 721

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1167742 (opens in a new tab)

35. 35.

    Barrat A, Cattuto C, Szomszor M, Van den Broeck W, Alani H (2010) Social dynamics in conferences: analyses of data from the Live Social Semantics application. Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference ISWC.

    Not in our library

36. 36.

    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001 ) Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

    Not in our library10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 (opens in a new tab)

37. 37.

    Stehlé J, Charbonnier F, Picard T, Cattuto C, Barrat A (2013 ) Gender homophily from spatial behavior in a primary school: a sociometric study. Soc. Net 35: 604

    Not in our library10.1016/j.socnet.2013.08.003 (opens in a new tab)

38. 38.

    Barrat A, Cattuto C, Colizza V, Gesualdo F, Isella L, Pandolfi E, et al (2013 ) Empirical temporal networks of face-to-face human interactions. EPJ Special Topics 222(6): 1295

    Not in our library10.1140/epjst/e2013-01927-7 (opens in a new tab)

39. 39.

    Barrat A, Cattuto C, Tozzi AE, Vanhems P, Voirin N (2014 ) Measuring contact patterns with wearable sensors: methods, data characteristics and applications to data-driven simulations of infectious diseases. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20:10–16.

    Not in our library10.1111/1469-0691.12472 (opens in a new tab)

40. 40.

    Karagiannis T, Le Boudec J-Y, Vojnovic M (2007 ) Power law and exponential decay of inter contact times between mobile devices. Mobicom 07: 183

    Not in our library10.1145/1287853.1287875 (opens in a new tab)

41. 41.

    Scherrer A, Borgnat P, Fleury E, Guillaume J-L, Robardet C (2008 ) Description and simulation of dynamic mobility networks. Comp Net 52: 2842

    Not in our library10.1016/j.comnet.2008.06.007 (opens in a new tab)

42. 42.

    Battiston F, Nicosia V, Latora V (2013) Structural measures for multiplex networks.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.89.032804 (opens in a new tab)

43. 43.

    Barabási A-L (2010) Bursts: The Hidden Pattern Behind Everything We Do. Dutton Adult.

    Not in our library

44. 44.

    Gauvin L, Panisson A, Barrat A, Cattuto C (2015) Revealing latent factors of temporal networks for mesoscale intervention in epidemic spread. arXiv:1501.02758

    Not in our library

45. 45.

    Hyett GP (1979) Validation of Diary Records of Telephone Calling Behavior The Recall Method in Social Surveys, Univ. of London Institute of Education, London, England: 136–138.

    Not in our library

46. 46.

    Lanyon RI, Goodstein LD (1997 ) Personality assessment. John Wiley & Sons.

    Not in our library

47. 47.

    Gemmetto V, Barrat A, Cattuto C (2014 ) Mitigation of infectious disease at school: targeted class closure vs school closure. BMC Inf. Dis. 14:695

    Not in our library10.1186/s12879-014-0695-9 (opens in a new tab)

Cited by papers we hold 4

• CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown · 2020
  No notice
• Networks of face-to-face social contacts in Niakhar, Senegal. · 2019
  Not checked
• Simplicial models of social contagion · 2019
  No notice
• Backtracking and Mixing Rate of Diffusion on Uncorrelated Temporal Networks · 2017
  Not checked

Questions about this paper

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.