Skip to content
naulon

Corrected on Jul 29, 2015.

Source: the publisher, via Crossref · checked Oct 19, 2026 · Read the notice

Accurate, Fully-Automated NMR Spectral Profiling for Metabolomics

Siamak Ravanbakhsh, Philip Liu, Trent C. Bjordahl and 9 more

PLOS ONE · 2015 · CC BY

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124219

Abstract

Many diseases cause significant changes to the concentrations of small molecules (a.k.a. metabolites) that appear in a person's biofluids, which means such diseases can often be readily detected from a person's "metabolic profile"-i.e., the list of concentrations of those metabolites. This information can be extracted from a biofluids Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectrum. However, due to its complexity, NMR spectral profiling has remained manual, resulting in slow, expensive and error-prone procedures that have hindered clinical and industrial adoption of metabolomics via NMR. This paper presents a system, BAYESIL, which can quickly, accurately, and autonomously produce a person's metabolic profile. Given a 1D 1H NMR spectrum of a complex biofluid (specifically serum or cerebrospinal fluid), BAYESIL can automatically determine the metabolic profile. This requires first performing several spectral processing steps, then matching the resulting spectrum against a reference compound library, which contains the "signatures" of each relevant metabolite. BAYESIL views spectral matching as an inference problem within a probabilistic graphical model that rapidly approximates the most probable metabolic profile. Our extensive studies on a diverse set of complex mixtures including real biological samples (serum and CSF), defined mixtures and realistic computer generated spectra; involving > 50 compounds, show that BAYESIL can autonomously find the concentration of NMR-detectable metabolites accurately (~ 90% correct identification and ~ 10% quantification error), in less than 5 minutes on a single CPU. These results demonstrate that BAYESIL is the first fully-automatic publicly-accessible system that provides quantitative NMR spectral profiling effectively-with an accuracy on these biofluids that meets or exceeds the performance of trained experts. We anticipate this tool will usher in high-throughput metabolomics and enable a wealth of new applications of NMR in clinical settings. BAYESIL is accessible at http://www.bayesil.ca.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 47

  1. 1.

    Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Systems biology: metabonomics. Nature, 455 (7216), 1054–1056.

    Not in our library10.1038/4551054a

  2. 2.

    Blow N (2008). Metabolomics: Biochemistry’s new look. Nature, 2008, 455(7213), 697–700.

    Not in our library10.1038/455697a

  3. 3.

    Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Lindon JC, Wilson ID. The challenges of modeling mammalian biocom-plexity. Nature biotech, 2004, 22(10), 1268–1274.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt1015

  4. 4.

    Nicholson JK., Connelly J, Lindon JC, Holmes E. Metabonomics: a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nature rev. Drug disc., 2002, 1(2), 153–161.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrd728

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Illig T, Gieger C, Zhai G, Römisch-Margl W, Wang-Sattler R, Prehn C et al (2010 ). A genome-wide perspective of genetic variation in human metabolism. Nat Genet, 42(2), 137–141.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng.507

  7. 7.

    Keurentjes JJ, Fu J, De Vos CR, Lommen A, Hall RD, Bino RJ, et al The genetics of plant metabolism. Nature genetics, 2006, 38(7), 842–849.

    Not in our library10.1038/ng1815

  8. 8.

    Shlomi T, Cabili MN, Herrgard M J, Palsson B, Ruppin E. Network-based prediction of human tissue-specific metabolism. Nature biotech, 2008, 26(9), 1003–1010.

    Not in our library10.1038/nbt.1487

  9. 9.

    Assfalg M, Bertini I, Colangiuli D, Luchinat C, Schafer H, Schutz B, Spraul M. Evidence of different metabolic phenotypes in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2008, 105(5), 1420–1424.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0705685105

  10. 10.

    Gerszten RE, Wang TJ. The search for new cardiovascular biomarkers. Nature, 2008, 451(7181), 949–952.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06802

  11. 11.

    Sreekumar A, Poisson LM, Rajendiran TM, Khan AP, Cao Q, Yu J et al Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression. Nature, 2009, 457(7231), 910–914.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07762

  12. 12.

    Griffin JL, Atherton H, Shockcor J, Atzori L. Metabolomics as a tool for cardiac research. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 2011, 8(11), 630–643.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrcardio.2011.138

  13. 13.

    Wishart D. Quantitative metabolomics using NMR. Trends Analyt Chem, 2008, 27(3), 228–237.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.trac.2007.12.001

  14. 14.

    Lindon JC, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Everett JR. Metabonomics: metabolic processes studied by NMR spectroscopy of biofluids. Conc. Magn. Res., 2000, 12(5), 289–320.

    Not in our library10.1002/1099-0534(2000)12:5<289::aid-cmr3>3.0.co;2-w

  15. 15.

    Weljie AM, Newton J, Mercier P, Carlson E, Slupsky CM. Targeted profiling: quantitative analysis of 1H NMR metabolomics data. Anal Chem, 2006, 78(13), 4430–4442.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac060209g

  16. 16.

    Tredwell GD, Behrends V, Geier FM, Liebeke M, Bundy JG. Between-person comparison of metabolite fitting for NMR-based quantitative metabolomics. Anal Chem, 2011, 83(22), 8683–8687.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac202123k

  17. 17.

    Mercier P, Lewis MJ, Chang D, Baker D, Wishart D. Towards automatic metabolomic profiling of high-resolution one-dimensional proton NMR spectra. J Biomol NMR, 2011, 49(3–4), 307–323.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10858-011-9480-x

  18. 18.

    Hao J, Astle W, De Iorio M, Ebbels TM. BATMANan R package for the automated quantification of metabolites from nuclear magnetic resonance spectra using a Bayesian model. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28(15), 2088–2090.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/bts308

  19. 19.

    Ravanbakhsh S, Poczos B, Greiner R. A Cross-Entropy method that optimizes partially decomposable problems: a new way to interpret NMR spectra, Proc Conf AAAI Artif Intell, 2010.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Brown DE, Campbell TW, Moore RN. Automated phase correction of FT NMR spectra by baseline optimization. J Magn Reson, 1989, 85(1), 15–23.

    Not in our library

  21. 21.

    de Brouwer H. Evaluation of algorithms for automated phase correction of NMR spectra. J Magn Reson, 2009, 201(2), 230–238.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jmr.2009.09.017

  22. 22.

    Rubinstein RY, Kroese DP. The cross-entropy method: a unified approach to combinatorial optimization, Monte-Carlo simulation and machine learning. Springer; 2004.

    Not in our library

  23. 23.

    Ravanbakhsh S, A stochastic optimization method for partially decomposable problems, with applications to analysis of NMR spectra, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta; 2009. Available: http://papersdb.cs.ualberta.ca/~papersdb/uploaded_files/1032/additional_thesis.pdf.

    Not in our library

  24. 24.

    Tang CG. An analysis of baseline distortion and offset in NMR spectra. J Magn Reson, 1994, Series A, 109(2), 232–240.

    Not in our library10.1006/jmra.1994.1160

  25. 25.

    Dietrich W, Rudel CH, Neumann M. Fast and precise automatic baseline correction of one-and two-dimensional NMR spectra. J Magn Reson, 1991, 91(1), 1–11.

    Not in our library

  26. 26.

    Fritsch FN, Carlson RE. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM J Numer Anal, 1980, 17(2), 238–246.

    Not in our library10.1137/0717021

  27. 27.

    Whittaker ET. On a new method of graduation. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 1922, 41, 63–75.

    Not in our library

  28. 28.

    Savitzky A, Golay MJ. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem, 1964, 36(8), 1627–1639.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac60214a047

  29. 29.

    Morris GA, Barjat H, Home TJ. Reference deconvolution methods. Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 1997, 31(2), 197–257.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0079-6565(97)00011-3

  30. 30.

    Gibbs JW. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics: developed with especial reference to the rational foundation of thermodynamics. Cambridge University Press; 2010.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Koller D, Friedman N. Probabilistic graphical models: principles and techniques. MIT press; 2009.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Mézard M, Parisi G, Zecchina R. Analytic and algorithmic solution of random satisfiability problems. Science, 2002, 297(5582), 812–815.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1073287

  33. 33.

    MacKay DJ, Neal RM. Near Shannon limit performance of low density parity check codes. Electronics letters, 1996, 32(18), 1645–1646.

    Not in our library10.1049/el:19961141

  34. 34.

    Friedman N. Inferring cellular networks using probabilistic graphical models. Science, 2004, 303(5659), 799–805.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1094068

  35. 35.

    Doucet A. Sequential monte carlo methods. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2001.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Wishart DS, Tzur D, Knox C, Eisner R, Guo AC, Young N, et al HMDB: the human metabolome database. Nucleic Acids Res, 2007, 35(suppl 1), D521–D526.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkl923

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Wishart DS, Lewis MJ, Morrissey JA, Flegel MD, Jeroncic K, Xiong Y, et al The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl, 2008, 871(2), 164–173.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.05.001

  39. 39.
  40. 40.

    Takeda I, Stretch C, Barnaby P, Bhatnager K, Rankin K, Fu H, et al Understanding the human salivary metabolome. NMR in Biomedicine, 2009, 22(6), 577–584.

    Not in our library10.1002/nbm.1369

  41. 41.

    Sundekilde UK, Larsen LB, Bertram HC. NMR-based milk metabolomics. Metabolites, 2013, 3(2), 204–222.

    Not in our library10.3390/metabo3020204

  42. 42.

    Saleem F, Bouatra S, Guo AC, Psychogios N, Mandal R, Dunn SM, et al The Bovine Ruminal Fluid Metabolome. Metabolomics, 2013, 9(2), 360–378.

    Not in our library10.1007/s11306-012-0458-9

  43. 43.

    Dietmair S, Timmins NE, Gray PP, Nielsen LK, Kromer JO. Towards quantitative metabolomics of mammalian cells: Development of a metabolite extraction protocol. Anal Biochem, 2010, 404(2), 155–164.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.ab.2010.04.031

  44. 44.

    Mashego MR, Rumbold K, De Mey M, Vandamme E, Soetaert W, Heijnen JJ. Microbial metabolomics: past, present and future methodologies. Biotechnology letters, 2007, 29(1), 1–16.

    Not in our library10.1007/s10529-006-9218-0

  45. 45.

    Griffin JL, Shockcor JP. Metabolic profiles of cancer cells. Nat Rev Cancer, 2004, 4(7), 551–561.

    Not in our library10.1038/nrc1390

  46. 46.

    Abate-Shen C, Shen MM. Diagnostics: The prostate-cancer metabolome. Nature, 2009, 457(7231), 799–800.

    Not in our library10.1038/457799a

  47. 47.

    Biais B, Allwood JW, Deborde C, Xu Y, Maucourt M, Beauvoit B et al 1H NMR, GC EI-TOFMS, and Data Set Correlation for Fruit Metabolomics: Application to Spatial Metabolite Analysis in Melon. Analytical chemistry, 2009, 81(8), 2884–2894.

    Not in our library10.1021/ac9001996

Cited by papers we hold 6

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.