Not checked for notices yet.

The assessment of the quality of reporting of systematic reviews/meta-analyses in diagnostic tests published by authors in China.

Long Ge, Jian-Cheng Wang, Jin-Long Li and 5 more

PLoS ONE · 2014

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085908

References 17

1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
2.
Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies · 2006
No notice
3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
6.
External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) · 2007
No notice
7.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
8.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
9.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
10.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
11.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
12.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
13.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
14.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
15.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
16.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
17.
The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration · 2009
No notice

Cited by papers we hold 1

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review · 2017
No notice

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.