Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

The number of resected lymph nodes (nLNs) combined with tumor size as a prognostic factor in patients with pathologic N0 and Nx non-small cell lung cancer.

Miaomiao Yang, Hongxin Cao, Xi Guo and 4 more

PLoS ONE · 2013

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073220 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of the number of resected lymph nodes (nLNs) in pathologic N0 (lymph node negative) and Nx (no lymph node examined) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains uncertain. Guidelines for optimal nLNs have not been established. In the current study, we evaluated whether a higher number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) results in better survival in different tumor size categories among NSCLC patients without metastatic LNs. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted. Based on nLNs (LN = 0, 1-7, >7) and tumor size (Ta: ≤ 3.5 cm, Tb: >3.5 cm) during surgery, patients were categorized into 6 groups (LN0Ta, LN0Tb, LN1-7Ta, LN1-7Tb, LN7-Ta and LN7-Tb). Survival and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine whether nLNs combined with tumor size was significant for overall survival (OS) or disease free survival (DFS) after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 428 patients were enrolled in the study. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that nLNs, tumor size and pathological stage were the independent prognosticators for OS and DFS. Data from our study suggested that lung cancer lymphadenectomy with more than 7 LNs removed should be considered a benchmark for surgery or pathology at an early stage. Survival was significantly better in the LN7-Ta group, compared with other 5 groups (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combined predictor (nLNs combined with tumor size) is an independent prognostic factor and a reasonable stratification criterion in patients with pathologic N0 and Nx NSCLC. The validation of our finding is warranted in further investigation.

Abstract licence: CC BY

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.