The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship

Abstract

Gender disparities appear to be decreasing in academia according to a number of metrics, such as grant funding, hiring, acceptance at scholarly journals, and productivity, and it might be tempting to think that gender inequity will soon be a problem of the past. However, a large-scale analysis based on over eight million papers across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities reveals a number of understated and persistent ways in which gender inequities remain. For instance, even where raw publication counts seem to be equal between genders, close inspection reveals that, in certain fields, men predominate in the prestigious first and last author positions. Moreover, women are significantly underrepresented as authors of single-authored papers. Academics should be aware of the subtle ways that gender disparities can occur in scholarly authorship.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 33

1. 1.

   West MS, Curtis JW (2006) AAUP faculty gender equity indicators 2006. Technical report, American Association of University Professors.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   National Research Council (2010) Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. National Academies Press.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Moss-Racusin C, Dovidio J, Brescoll V, Graham M, Handelsman J (2012 ) Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 16474–16479.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1211286109

4. 4.

   Conley D, Stadmark J (2012 ) Gender matters: A call to commission more women writers. Nature 488: 590.

   Not in our library10.1038/488590a

5. 5.

   Waltman L (2012 ) An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship publishing. Journal of Informetrics 6: 700–711.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Zuckerman H (1968 ) Patterns of name ordering among authors of scientific papers: A study of social symbolism and its ambiguity. American Journal of Sociology 276–291.

   Not in our library

7. 7.

   Wren JD, Kozak KZ, Johnson KR, Deakyne SJ, Schilling LM, et al (2007 ) The write position. EMBO reports 8: 988–991.

   Not in our library10.1038/sj.embor.7401095

8. 8.

   Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey CC, Henault LE, Chang Y, et al (2006 ) The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature–a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med 355: 281–7.

   Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa053910

9. 9.

   Feramisco JD, Leitenberger JJ, Redfern SI, Bian A, Xie XJ, et al (2009 ) A gender gap in the dermatology literature? Cross-sectional analysis of manuscript authorship trends in dermatology journals during 3 decades. J Am Acad Dermatol 60: 63–9.

   Not in our library10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.044

10. 10.

    Sidhu R, Rajashekhar P, Lavin VL, Parry J, Attwood J, et al (2009 ) The gender imbalance in academic medicine: A study of female authorship in the united kingdom. J R Soc Med 102: 337–42.

    Not in our library10.1258/jrsm.2009.080378

11. 11.

    Dotson B (2011 ) Women as authors in the pharmacy literature: 1989–2009. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacists 68: 1736–1739.

    Not in our library10.2146/ajhp100597

12. 12.

    de Solla Price DJ (1965 ) Networks of scienti_c papers. Science 149: 510–515.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.149.3683.510

13. 13.

    Rosvall M, Bergstrom CT (2008 ) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 1118–1123.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0706851105

14. 14.

    Rosvall M, Axelsson D, Bergstrom CT (2010 ) The map equation. European Journal of Physics 178: 13–23.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Lancichinetti A, Fortunato S (2009 ) Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis. Physical Review E 80 056117: 1–11.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.80.056117

16. 16.
    Multilevel Compression of Random Walks on Networks Reveals Hierarchical Organization in Large Integrated Systems · 2011

    No notice
17. 17.

    Lieberson S, Dumais S, Baumann S (2000 ) The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries. American Journal of Sociology 105: 1249–1287.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Boschini A, Sjögren A (2007 ) Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics 25: 325–365.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Dolado JJ, Felgueroso F, Almunia M (2005) Do men and women economists choose the same research fields? Evidence from top 50 departments. Technical report, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Endersby JW (1996 ) Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly 77: 375–392.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007 ) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316: 1036–1039.

    Not in our library10.1126/science.1136099

22. 22.

    Etzkowitz H, Kemelgor C, Uzzi B (2000) Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge University Press.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Wenneras C, Wold A (1997 ) Nepotism and sexism in peer review. Nature 387: 341–343.

    Not in our library10.1038/387341a0

24. 24.

    Spelke ES, Grace AD (2006) Sex, math, and science. In: Ceci S, Williams W, editors, Why Aren't MoreWomen In Science?: Top Gender Researchers Debate the Evidence., APA Publications.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    England P, Li S (2006 ) Desegregation Stalled: The Changing Gender Composition of College Majors, 1971–2002. Gender & Society 20: 657–677.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    Fox MF (2001 ) Women, Science, and Academia: Graduate Education and Careers. Gender & Society 1: 654–666.

    Not in our library

27. 27.

    Babcock L, Laschever S (2007) Women Don't Ask: The High Cost of Avoiding Negotiation-and Positive Strategies for Change. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.

    Not in our library

28. 28.

    Rudman LA (1998 ) Self-Promotion as a Risk Factor for Women: The Costs andBenefits of Counterstereotypical Impression Management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 629–45.

    Not in our library10.1037//0022-3514.74.3.629

29. 29.

    Ceci SJ, Williams WM (2011 ) Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108: 3157–3162.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1014871108

30. 30.

    Goldin C, Rouse C (2000 ) Orchestrating Impartiality: The Impact of “Blind” Auditions on Female Musicians. American Economic Review 90: 715–741.

    Not in our library

31. 31.

    Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I (2007 ) Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112: 1297–1339.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    National Academy of Sciences (2007) Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Not in our library

33. 33.

    Burrelli J (2008) Thirty-three years of women in S&E faculty positions. Infobrief, Science Resources Statistics NSF 08-308, National Science Foundation.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 11

• Sources of bias in artificial intelligence that perpetuate healthcare disparities—A global review · 2022
  No notice
• Chapter Short-term and long-term international scientific mobility of Italian PhDs: An analysis by gender · 2021
  Not checked
• Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines · 2020
  No notice
• A scientometric review of genome-wide association studies · 2019
  No notice
• Corpus Colossal: A Bibliometric Analysis of Neuroscience Abstracts and Impact Factor · 2019
  Not checked
• The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration · 2018
  No notice
• The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? · 2018
  No notice
• Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals · 2018
  No notice
• Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services · 2018
  No notice
• Digitally enhanced recovery: Investigating the use of digital self-tracking for monitoring leisure time physical activity of cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. · 2017
  Not checked
• Under-representation of women on dental journal editorial boards. · 2015
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.