Not checked for notices yet.
A survey on data reproducibility in cancer research provides insights into our limited ability to translate findings from the laboratory to the clinic.
Aaron Mobley, Suzanne K Linder, Russell Braeuer and 2 more
PLoS ONE · 2013
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063221
References 5
- 1.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 2.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 3.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 4.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
- 5.
This reference’s wording can’t be shown under the paper’s licence.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 5
- Changes in the gut microbiome and fermentation products concurrent with enhanced longevity in acarbose-treated mice · 2019No notice
- Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations · 2019No notice
- Oxygenation in cell culture: Critical parameters for reproducibility are routinely not reported · 2018No notice
- An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research · 2014No notice
- ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science · 2014No notice
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.