A Tale of Many Cities: Universal Patterns in Human Urban Mobility

Abstract

The advent of geographic online social networks such as Foursquare, where users voluntarily signal their current location, opens the door to powerful studies on human movement. In particular the fine granularity of the location data, with GPS accuracy down to 10 meters, and the worldwide scale of Foursquare adoption are unprecedented. In this paper we study urban mobility patterns of people in several metropolitan cities around the globe by analyzing a large set of Foursquare users. Surprisingly, while there are variations in human movement in different cities, our analysis shows that those are predominantly due to different distributions of places across different urban environments. Moreover, a universal law for human mobility is identified, which isolates as a key component the rank-distance, factoring in the number of places between origin and destination, rather than pure physical distance, as considered in some previous works. Building on our findings, we also show how a rank-based movement model accurately captures real human movements in different cities.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

References 36

1. 1.

   Ravenstein EG. The laws of migration. 1885;48:167-235.

   Not in our library

2. 2.

   Zheng Y, Zhang L, Xie X, Ma WY. Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from gps trajectories. 2009.

   Not in our library

3. 3.

   Zheng VW, Zheng Y, Xie X, Yang Q. Collaborative location and activity recommendations with gps history data. 2010.

   Not in our library

4. 4.

   Quercia D, Lathia N, Calabrese F, Lorenzo GD, Crowcroft J. Recommending social events from mobile phone location data. 2010.

   Not in our library

5. 5.

   Scellato S, Mascolo C, Musolesi M, Crowcroft J. Track globally, deliver locally: Improving content delivery networks by tracking geographic social cascades. 2011.

   Not in our library

6. 6.

   Onnela JP, Saramäki J, Hyvönen J, Szabó G, Lazer D, et al. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;104:7332-7336.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0610245104

7. 7.

   Crandall D, Backstrom L, Cosley D, Suri S, Huttenlocher D, et al. Inferring social ties from geographic coincidences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:22436-22441.

   Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1006155107

8. 8.

   Scellato S, Noulas A, Lambiotte R, Mascolo C. Socio-spatial properties of online locationbased social networks. 2011.

   Not in our library

9. 9.

   Cho E, Mayers SA, Leskovec J. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. 2011.

   Not in our library

10. 10.

    Nicholson K, Webster RG. Textbook of Influenza. 1998.

    Not in our library

11. 11.

    Hufnagel L, Brockmann D, Geisel T. Forecast and control of epidemics in a globalized world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101:15124.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0308344101

12. 12.

    Colizza V, Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Vespignani A. Predictability and epidemic pathways in global outbreaks of infectious diseases: The sars case study. BMC Medicine. 2007;5.

    Not in our library10.1186/1741-7015-5-34

13. 13.

    Carrothers V. A historical review of the gravity and potential concepts of human interaction. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1956;22:94-102.

    Not in our library

14. 14.

    Wilson AG. A statistical theory of spatial distribution models. Transportation Research. 1967;1:253-269.

    Not in our library

15. 15.

    Erlander S, Stewart NF. The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis: Theory and Extensions. 1990.

    Not in our library

16. 16.

    Levy M. Scale-free human migration and the geography of social networks. Physica A. 2010;389:4913-4917.

    Not in our library

17. 17.

    Krings GM, Calabrese F, Ratti C, Blondel VD. Urban gravity: a model for inter-city telecommunication flows. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment. 2009;L07003.

    Not in our library

18. 18.

    Jung WS, Wang F, Stanley HE. Gravity model in the korean highway. Europhysics Letters. 2008;81:48005.

    Not in our library

19. 19.

    Stouffer S. Intervening opportunities: A theory relating mobility and distance. American Sociological Review. 1940;5:845-867.

    Not in our library

20. 20.

    Easa SM. Urban trip distribution in practice. i: Conventional analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering. 1993;119:793-815.

    Not in our library

21. 21.

    Miller E. A note on the role of distance in migration: costs of mobility versus intervening opportunities. Journal of Regional Science. 1972;12:475-478.

    Not in our library

22. 22.

    Haynes KE, Poston D, Sehnirring P. Inter-metropolitan migration in high and low opportunity areas: indirect tests of the distance and intervening opportunities hypotheses. Economic Geography. 1973;49:68-73.

    Not in our library

23. 23.

    Wadycki WJ. Stouffer's model of migration: A comparison of interstate and metropolitan flows. Demography. 1975;12:121-128.

    Not in our library

24. 24.

    Freymeyer RH, Ritchey PN. Spatial distribution of opportunities and magnitude of migration: An investigation of stouffer's theory. Sociological Perspectives. 1985;28:419-440.

    Not in our library

25. 25.

    Cheung C, Black J. Residential location-specific travel preferences in an intervening opportunities model: transport assessment for urban release areas. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies. 2005;6:3773-3788.

    Not in our library

26. 26.

    González MC, Hidalgo CA, Barábasi AL. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature. 2008;453:779-782.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature06958

27. 27.

    Brockmann D, Hufnagel L, Geisel T. The scaling laws of human travel. Nature. 2006;439:462-465.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature04292

28. 28.

    Isaacman S, Becker R, Caceres R, Kobourov S, Rowland J, et al. A tale of two cities. 2010.

    Not in our library

29. 29.

    Foursquare (Website Last Accessed: April, 2012). http://www.foursquare.com

    Not in our library

30. 30.

    Liben-Nowell D, Novak J, Kumar R, Raghavan P, Tomkins A. Geographic routing in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:11623-11628.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0503018102

31. 31.

    Kullback S, Leibler RA. On information and sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1951;22:79-86.

    Not in our library

32. 32.

    Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West G. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104:7301-7306.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0610172104

33. 33.

    Bettencourt L, West G. A unified theory of urban living. Nature. 2010;467:912-913.

    Not in our library10.1038/467912a

34. 34.

    Smith MJ, Telfer S, Kallio ER, Burthe S, Cook AR, et al. Host-pathogen time series data in wildlife support a transmission function between density and frequency dependence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2009;106:7905-7909.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0809145106

35. 35.

    Simini F, González AMM, Barábasi AL. A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature. 2012.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature10856

36. 36.

    Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman MEJ. Power-law distributions in empirical data. 2009.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 1

• Assessing Essential Qualities of Urban Space with Emotional and Visual Data Based on GIS Technique · 2016
  Not checked

Reads

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.