Skip to content
naulon
Not checkedNot checked for notices yet.

Gender-related differences in the dysfunctional resting networks of migraine suffers.

Jixin Liu, Wei Qin, Jiaofen Nan and 12 more

PLoS ONE · 2011

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027049 (opens in a new tab)

We email you when a new notice or a question about this paper appears.

Abstract

<h4>Background</h4>Migraine shows gender-specific incidence and has a higher prevalence in females. However, little is known about gender-related differences in dysfunctional brain organization, which may account for gender-specific vulnerability and characteristics of migraine. In this study, we considered gender-related differences in the topological property of resting functional networks.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>Data was obtained from 38 migraine patients (18 males and 20 females) and 38 healthy subjects (18 males and 20 females). We used the graph theory analysis, which becomes a powerful tool in investigating complex brain networks on a whole brain scale and could describe functional interactions between brain regions. Using this approach, we compared the brain functional networks between these two groups, and several network properties were investigated, such as small-worldness, network resilience, nodal centrality, and interregional connections. In our findings, these network characters were all disrupted in patients suffering from chronic migraine. More importantly, these functional damages in the migraine-affected brain had a skewed balance between males and females. In female patients, brain functional networks showed worse resilience, more regions exhibited decreased nodal centrality, and more functional connections revealed abnormalities than in male patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>These results indicated that migraine may have an additional influence on females and lead to more dysfunctional organization in their resting functional networks.

Abstract licence: CC BY

References74

  1. 8.
  2. 18.

38 more references, whose wording the paper’s licence keeps private.

All 74 references

Cited by papers we hold2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.