Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 19, 2026.

Microbiome Profiling by Illumina Sequencing of Combinatorial Sequence-Tagged PCR Products

Gregory B. Gloor, Ruben Hummelen, Jean M. Macklaim and 4 more

PLoS ONE · 2010

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015406

Abstract

We developed a low-cost, high-throughput microbiome profiling method that uses combinatorial sequence tags attached to PCR primers that amplify the rRNA V6 region. Amplified PCR products are sequenced using an Illumina paired-end protocol to generate millions of overlapping reads. Combinatorial sequence tagging can be used to examine hundreds of samples with far fewer primers than is required when sequence tags are incorporated at only a single end. The number of reads generated permitted saturating or near-saturating analysis of samples of the vaginal microbiome. The large number of reads allowed an in-depth analysis of errors, and we found that PCR-induced errors composed the vast majority of non-organism derived species variants, an observation that has significant implications for sequence clustering of similar high-throughput data. We show that the short reads are sufficient to assign organisms to the genus or species level in most cases. We suggest that this method will be useful for the deep sequencing of any short nucleotide region that is taxonomically informative; these include the V3, V5 regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes and the eukaryotic V9 region that is gaining popularity for sampling protist diversity.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 40

  1. 1.
  2. 2.

    Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil ph as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:5111-20.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.00335-09

  3. 3.

    Polymenakou PN, Lampadariou N, Mandalakis M, Tselepides A. Phylogenetic diversity of sediment bacteria from the southern cretan margin, eastern mediterranean sea. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2009 Feb;32:17-26.

    Not in our library10.1016/j.syapm.2008.09.006

  4. 4.

    Hamady M, Knight R. Microbial community profiling for human microbiome projects: Tools, techniques, and challenges. Genome Res. 2009;19:1141-52.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.085464.108

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Schellenberg J, Links MG, Hill JE, Dumonceaux TJ, Peters GA, et al. Pyrosequencing of the chaperonin-60 universal target as a tool for determining microbial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:2889-98.

    Not in our library10.1128/aem.01640-08

  7. 7.

    Nocker A, Burr M, Camper AK. Genotypic microbial community profiling: a critical technical review. Microb Ecol. 2007;54:276-89.

    Not in our library10.1007/s00248-006-9199-5

  8. 8.

    Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clin Chem. 2009;55:856-66.

    Not in our library10.1373/clinchem.2008.107565

  9. 9.

    Reeder J, Knight R. The ‘rare biosphere’: a reality check. Nat Methods. 2009;6:636-7.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth0909-636

  10. 10.

    Quince C, Lanzén A, Curtis TP, Davenport RJ, Hall N, et al. Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data. Nat Methods. 2009;6:639-41.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1361

  11. 11.

    Pawlowski J, Lecroq B. Short rdna barcodes for species identification in foraminifera. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2010;57:197-205.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00468.x

  12. 12.

    Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, et al. Global patterns of 16s rrna diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1000080107

  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.

    Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rrna analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141-5.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkn879

  16. 16.
  17. 17.

    Laurikari V. Tre the free and portable approximate regex matching library. 2010.

    Not in our library

  18. 18.

    Bentley DR, Balasubramanian S, Swerdlow HP, Smith GP, Milton J, et al. Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature. 2008;456:53-9.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07517

  19. 19.

    Smith DR, Quinlan AR, Peckham HE, Makowsky K, Tao W, et al. Rapid whole-genome mutational profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies. Genome Res. 2008;18:1638-42.

    Not in our library10.1101/gr.077776.108

  20. 20.

    Whiteford N, Skelly T, Curtis C, Ritchie ME, Löhr A, et al. Swift: primary data analysis for the illumina solexa sequencing platform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2194-9.

    Not in our library10.1093/bioinformatics/btp383

  21. 21.
  22. 22.

    Engels WR. Contributing software to the internet: the amplify program. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993;18:448-50.

    Not in our library10.1016/0968-0004(93)90148-g

  23. 23.

    Lahr DJG, Katz LA. Reducing the impact of pcr-mediated recombination in molecular evolution and environmental studies using a new-generation high-fidelity dna polymerase. Biotechniques. 2009;47:857-66.

    Not in our library10.2144/000113219

  24. 24.
  25. 25.

    Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. Genbank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D46-51.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkp1024

  26. 26.

    Altschul SF, Gish W. Local alignment statistics. Methods Enzymol. 1996;266:460-80.

    Not in our library10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66029-7

  27. 27.

    Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by rna-seq. Nat Methods. 2008;5:621-8.

    Not in our library10.1038/nmeth.1226

  28. 28.

    Hurlbert S. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology. 1971;52:577-586.

    Not in our library10.2307/1934145

  29. 29.

    Smith EP, Van Belle G. Nonparametric estimation of species richness. Biometrics. 1984;40:119-129.

    Not in our library

  30. 30.

    Efron B. Nonparametric estimates of standard error: The jackknife, the bootstrap and other methods. Biometrika. 1981;68:589.

    Not in our library

  31. 31.

    Colwell R. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. 2009.

    Not in our library

  32. 32.

    Chao A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1984;11:265-270.

    Not in our library

  33. 33.

    Chao A, Lee SM. Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J American Stat Soc. 1992;87:210-217.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, B O. vegan: Community ecology package version 18-3. r package. 2010.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.
  36. 36.

    Shi Y, Chen L, Tong J, Xu C. Preliminary characterization of vaginal microbiota in healthy chinese women using cultivation-independent methods. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:525-32.

    Not in our library10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00971.x

  37. 37.
  38. 38.

    Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.1002611107

  39. 39.

    Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, et al. Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389-3402.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

  40. 40.

    Cock PJA, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM. The sanger fastq file format for sequences with quality scores, and the solexa/illumina fastq variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:1767-71.

    Not in our library10.1093/nar/gkp1137

Cited by papers we hold 27

and 7 more

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.