Skip to content
naulon

No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.

Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks

Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler

PLoS ONE · 2010

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012948

Abstract

Current methods for the detection of contagious outbreaks give contemporaneous information about the course of an epidemic at best. It is known that individuals near the center of a social network are likely to be infected sooner during the course of an outbreak, on average, than those at the periphery. Unfortunately, mapping a whole network to identify central individuals who might be monitored for infection is typically very difficult. We propose an alternative strategy that does not require ascertainment of global network structure, namely, simply monitoring the friends of randomly selected individuals. Such individuals are known to be more central. To evaluate whether such a friend group could indeed provide early detection, we studied a flu outbreak at Harvard College in late 2009. We followed 744 students who were either members of a group of randomly chosen individuals or a group of their friends. Based on clinical diagnoses, the progression of the epidemic in the friend group occurred 13.9 days (95% C.I. 9.9-16.6) in advance of the randomly chosen group (i.e., the population as a whole). The friend group also showed a significant lead time (p<0.05) on day 16 of the epidemic, a full 46 days before the peak in daily incidence in the population as a whole. This sensor method could provide significant additional time to react to epidemics in small or large populations under surveillance. The amount of lead time will depend on features of the outbreak and the network at hand. The method could in principle be generalized to other biological, psychological, informational, or behavioral contagions that spread in networks.

Full text

Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:

Read at PubMed Central

References 38

  1. 1.

    Update: Influenza Activity – United States, August 30, 2009 – January 9, 2010. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep. 2010;59:38-48.

    Not in our library

  2. 2.

    Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, et al. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature. 2009;457:1012-1014.

    Not in our library10.1038/nature07634

  3. 3.

    Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E. Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clinical Infect Dis. 2009;49:1557-1564.

    Not in our library10.1086/630200

  4. 4.

    Christley RM, Pinchbeck GL, Bowers RG, Clancy D, French NP, et al. Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1024-1031.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwi308

  5. 5.
  6. 6.

    Kitsak M, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, et al. “Identifying Influential Spreaders in Complex Networks,” ArXiv working paper 1001.5285v2. 2010.

    Not in our library

  7. 7.

    Cauchemez S, Donnelly CA, Reed C, Ghani AC, Fraser C, et al. Household Transmission of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:2619-2627.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0905498

  8. 8.

    Ross R. Some a priori pathometric equations. Br Med J. 1915;1:546.

    Not in our library10.1136/bmj.1.2830.546

  9. 9.

    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 1964.

    Not in our library

  10. 10.

    Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Immunization of complex networks. Phys Rev E. 2002;65:036104.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.65.036104

  11. 11.

    Dezso Z, Barabasi AL. Halting viruses in scale-free networks. Phys Rev E. 2002;65:055103(R).

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.65.055103

  12. 12.

    Cohen R, Havlin S, ben-Avraham D. Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91:1-4.

    Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.91.247901

  13. 13.

    Bahr DB, Browning RC, Wyatt HR, Hill JO. Exploiting social networks to mitigate the obesity epidemic. Obesity. 2009;17:723-728.

    Not in our library10.1038/oby.2008.615

  14. 14.

    Leskovec J, Krause A, Guestrin C, Faloutsos C, VanBriesen J, et al. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. 2007;420-429.

    Not in our library

  15. 15.

    Feld S. Why your friends have more friends than you do. Am J Sociol. 1991;96:1464-1477.

    Not in our library

  16. 16.

    Zuckerman EW, Jost JR. What makes you think you're so popular? Self-evaluations maintenance and the subjective side of the “friendship paradox.”. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2001;64:207-223.

    Not in our library

  17. 17.

    Smith DMD, Lee CF, Onnela JP, Johnson NF. Link-space formalism for network analysis. Phys Rev E. 2008;77:036112.

    Not in our library10.1103/physreve.77.036112

  18. 18.

    Newman M. Ego-centered networks and the ripple effect. “Ego-centered Networks and the Ripple Effect.”. Social Networks. 2003;25:83-95.

    Not in our library

  19. 19.

    Dorogovtsev SN, Goltsev AV, Mendes JFF. Critical phenomena in complex networks. Reviews Mod Phys. 2008;80:1275-1335.

    Not in our library

  20. 20.

    Dushoff J, Plotkin JB, Viboud C, Earn DJD, Simonsen L. Mortality due to influenza in the United States – An Annualized regression approach using multiple-cause mortality data. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:181-187.

    Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwj024

  21. 21.

    Greenbaum JA, Kotturi MF, Kim Y, Oseroff C, Vaughan K, et al. Pre-existing immunity against swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses in the general human population. PNAS. 2009.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911580106

  22. 22.

    Trifonov V, Khiabanian H, Rabadan R. Geographic Dependence, Surveillance, and Origins of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:115-119.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmp0904572

  23. 23.

    Lessler J, Reich NG, Cummings DAT. Outbreak of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) at a New York City School. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:2628-2636.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0906089

  24. 24.

    2010.

    Not in our library

  25. 25.

    Khazen N, Hutton DW, Garber AM, Hupert N, Owens DK. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pandemic influenza (H1N1). Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:829-839.

    Not in our library10.1059/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00157

  26. 26.

    Davey VJ, Glass RJ, Min HJ, Beyeler WE, Glass LM. Effective, robust design of community mitigation for pandemic influenza: A systematic examination of proposed US guidance. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2606.

    Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0002606

  27. 27.

    Polgreen PM, Nelson FD, Neumann FR. Use of Prediction Markets to Forecast Infectious Disease Activity. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;44:272-279.

    Not in our library10.1086/510427

  28. 28.

    Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K. Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Am J Sociol. 2004;110:44-91.

    Not in our library

  29. 29.

    Rosenquist JN, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Social Network Determinants of Depression. Molecular Psychiatry. 2010.

    Not in our library10.1038/mp.2010.13

  30. 30.

    Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks. PNAS. 2010;107:5334-5338.

    Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0913149107

  31. 31.

    Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:2249-2258.

    Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa0706154

  32. 32.

    Scott BA, Judge TA. The popularity contest at work: who wins, why, and what do they receive? J Applied Psych. 2009;94:20-33.

    Not in our library10.1037/a0012951

  33. 33.

    Freeman LC. Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 1977;40:35-41.

    Not in our library

  34. 34.

    Batagelj V, Mrvar A. PAJEK: Program for Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks, version 1.14, 2006.

    Not in our library

  35. 35.

    Kamada T, Kawai C. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters. 1989;31:113-120.

    Not in our library

  36. 36.

    Turnbull BW. The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J R Statist. Soc B. 1976;38:290-295.

    Not in our library

  37. 37.

    Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. 1988.

    Not in our library

  38. 38.

    Huet S, Bouvier A, Poursat MA, Jolivet E. Statistical tools for nonlinear regression: a practical guide with S-PLUS and R examples. 2003.

    Not in our library

Cited by papers we hold 2

Reads

Read by people on this page

None yet.

Checked or read by AI through naulon

None yet.

A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.

Are you an author?

Is this your paper?

Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.