No retraction, correction or concern found when last checked on Oct 20, 2026.
Social Network Sensors for Early Detection of Contagious Outbreaks
Nicholas A. Christakis, James H. Fowler
PLoS ONE · 2010
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012948
Abstract
Current methods for the detection of contagious outbreaks give contemporaneous information about the course of an epidemic at best. It is known that individuals near the center of a social network are likely to be infected sooner during the course of an outbreak, on average, than those at the periphery. Unfortunately, mapping a whole network to identify central individuals who might be monitored for infection is typically very difficult. We propose an alternative strategy that does not require ascertainment of global network structure, namely, simply monitoring the friends of randomly selected individuals. Such individuals are known to be more central. To evaluate whether such a friend group could indeed provide early detection, we studied a flu outbreak at Harvard College in late 2009. We followed 744 students who were either members of a group of randomly chosen individuals or a group of their friends. Based on clinical diagnoses, the progression of the epidemic in the friend group occurred 13.9 days (95% C.I. 9.9-16.6) in advance of the randomly chosen group (i.e., the population as a whole). The friend group also showed a significant lead time (p<0.05) on day 16 of the epidemic, a full 46 days before the peak in daily incidence in the population as a whole. This sensor method could provide significant additional time to react to epidemics in small or large populations under surveillance. The amount of lead time will depend on features of the outbreak and the network at hand. The method could in principle be generalized to other biological, psychological, informational, or behavioral contagions that spread in networks.
Full text
Its licence does not allow us to show the full text. Read it at PubMed Central:
Read at PubMed CentralReferences 38
- 1.
Update: Influenza Activity – United States, August 30, 2009 – January 9, 2010. Morb Mortal Weekly Rep. 2010;59:38-48.
Not in our library
- 2.
Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, et al. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature. 2009;457:1012-1014.
Not in our library10.1038/nature07634
- 3.
Carneiro HA, Mylonakis E. Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks. Clinical Infect Dis. 2009;49:1557-1564.
Not in our library10.1086/630200
- 4.
Christley RM, Pinchbeck GL, Bowers RG, Clancy D, French NP, et al. Infection in social networks: using network analysis to identify high-risk individuals. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:1024-1031.
Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwi308
- 5.
- 6.
Kitsak M, Gallos LK, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, et al. “Identifying Influential Spreaders in Complex Networks,” ArXiv working paper 1001.5285v2. 2010.
Not in our library
- 7.
Cauchemez S, Donnelly CA, Reed C, Ghani AC, Fraser C, et al. Household Transmission of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:2619-2627.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0905498
- 8.
Ross R. Some a priori pathometric equations. Br Med J. 1915;1:546.
Not in our library10.1136/bmj.1.2830.546
- 9.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 1964.
Not in our library
- 10.
Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A. Immunization of complex networks. Phys Rev E. 2002;65:036104.
Not in our library10.1103/physreve.65.036104
- 11.
Dezso Z, Barabasi AL. Halting viruses in scale-free networks. Phys Rev E. 2002;65:055103(R).
Not in our library10.1103/physreve.65.055103
- 12.
Cohen R, Havlin S, ben-Avraham D. Efficient immunization strategies for computer networks and populations. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;91:1-4.
Not in our library10.1103/physrevlett.91.247901
- 13.
Bahr DB, Browning RC, Wyatt HR, Hill JO. Exploiting social networks to mitigate the obesity epidemic. Obesity. 2009;17:723-728.
Not in our library10.1038/oby.2008.615
- 14.
Leskovec J, Krause A, Guestrin C, Faloutsos C, VanBriesen J, et al. Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks. 2007;420-429.
Not in our library
- 15.
Feld S. Why your friends have more friends than you do. Am J Sociol. 1991;96:1464-1477.
Not in our library
- 16.
Zuckerman EW, Jost JR. What makes you think you're so popular? Self-evaluations maintenance and the subjective side of the “friendship paradox.”. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2001;64:207-223.
Not in our library
- 17.
Smith DMD, Lee CF, Onnela JP, Johnson NF. Link-space formalism for network analysis. Phys Rev E. 2008;77:036112.
Not in our library10.1103/physreve.77.036112
- 18.
Newman M. Ego-centered networks and the ripple effect. “Ego-centered Networks and the Ripple Effect.”. Social Networks. 2003;25:83-95.
Not in our library
- 19.
Dorogovtsev SN, Goltsev AV, Mendes JFF. Critical phenomena in complex networks. Reviews Mod Phys. 2008;80:1275-1335.
Not in our library
- 20.
Dushoff J, Plotkin JB, Viboud C, Earn DJD, Simonsen L. Mortality due to influenza in the United States – An Annualized regression approach using multiple-cause mortality data. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:181-187.
Not in our library10.1093/aje/kwj024
- 21.
Greenbaum JA, Kotturi MF, Kim Y, Oseroff C, Vaughan K, et al. Pre-existing immunity against swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses in the general human population. PNAS. 2009.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0911580106
- 22.
Trifonov V, Khiabanian H, Rabadan R. Geographic Dependence, Surveillance, and Origins of the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:115-119.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmp0904572
- 23.
Lessler J, Reich NG, Cummings DAT. Outbreak of 2009 Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) at a New York City School. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:2628-2636.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmoa0906089
- 24.
2010.
Not in our library
- 25.
Khazen N, Hutton DW, Garber AM, Hupert N, Owens DK. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pandemic influenza (H1N1). Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:829-839.
Not in our library10.1059/0003-4819-151-12-200912150-00157
- 26.
Davey VJ, Glass RJ, Min HJ, Beyeler WE, Glass LM. Effective, robust design of community mitigation for pandemic influenza: A systematic examination of proposed US guidance. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2606.
Not in our library10.1371/journal.pone.0002606
- 27.
Polgreen PM, Nelson FD, Neumann FR. Use of Prediction Markets to Forecast Infectious Disease Activity. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2007;44:272-279.
Not in our library10.1086/510427
- 28.
Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K. Chains of affection: The structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks. Am J Sociol. 2004;110:44-91.
Not in our library
- 29.
Rosenquist JN, Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Social Network Determinants of Depression. Molecular Psychiatry. 2010.
Not in our library10.1038/mp.2010.13
- 30.
Fowler JH, Christakis NA. Cooperative Behavior Cascades in Human Social Networks. PNAS. 2010;107:5334-5338.
Not in our library10.1073/pnas.0913149107
- 31.
Christakis NA, Fowler JH. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:2249-2258.
Not in our library10.1056/nejmsa0706154
- 32.
Scott BA, Judge TA. The popularity contest at work: who wins, why, and what do they receive? J Applied Psych. 2009;94:20-33.
Not in our library10.1037/a0012951
- 33.
Freeman LC. Set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry. 1977;40:35-41.
Not in our library
- 34.
Batagelj V, Mrvar A. PAJEK: Program for Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks, version 1.14, 2006.
Not in our library
- 35.
Kamada T, Kawai C. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters. 1989;31:113-120.
Not in our library
- 36.
Turnbull BW. The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J R Statist. Soc B. 1976;38:290-295.
Not in our library
- 37.
Bates DM, Watts DG. Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications. 1988.
Not in our library
- 38.
Huet S, Bouvier A, Poursat MA, Jolivet E. Statistical tools for nonlinear regression: a practical guide with S-PLUS and R examples. 2003.
Not in our library
Cited by papers we hold 2
Reads
Read by people on this page
None yet.
Checked or read by AI through naulon
None yet.
A person counts once a day per paper. We keep no cookie and no address: a reader is a hash that changes every day. Any month under five reads shows no number.
Are you an author?
Is this your paper?
Claim it to add your note and be paid when agents cite it. Free.